Jasper W K Tong1, Eddie Y K Ng. 1. Podiatry Department, Rehab Centre, Singapore General Hospital, Outram Road, Singapore 169608, Singapore. jasper.tong.w.k@sgh.com.sg
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to investigate the amount of pressure reduction for different padding and insole materials commonly used in the podiatry clinic. METHODS: Plantar pressure were taken for 5 subjects without insoles fitted (BF) in their daily sports shoes, and thereafter with 4 pairs of simple insoles (6.4 mm thick) each as follow: SRP - Slow Recovery Poron, P - Poron, PPF - Poron+Plastazote (firm) and PPS - Poron+Plastazote (soft). In addition, subjects were also tested with semi-compressed felt (SCF) padding with a 1st metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ) aperture cut-out bilaterally. Minimum, maximum, mean pressure and peak pressure at the hallux, 1st, 2nd, 3rd/4th and 5th MTPJ across both feet were analysed. Repeated measures ANOVA with post hoc Bonferroni paired wise comparison was used to test for any statistical significance at the 95% confidence level for all pressure data. RESULTS: PPF was significant in reducing the minimum (p<0.005) and mean pressure (p<0.03) when compared to BF. This accounted for approximately 28% and 27% pressure reduction in minimum and mean pressure respectively. Peak pressure on the 1st MTPJ locality showed significant reduction of 37% and 29% with the use of SCF (p<0.004) and PPF (p<0.004), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: All 4 commonly used insole materials were able to reduce pressure across the whole foot with PPF achieving significance. Off-loading the 1st MTPJ would still be best achieved with the commonly used plantar metatarsal pad of SCF with the aperture cut-out design. Copyright (c) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to investigate the amount of pressure reduction for different padding and insole materials commonly used in the podiatry clinic. METHODS: Plantar pressure were taken for 5 subjects without insoles fitted (BF) in their daily sports shoes, and thereafter with 4 pairs of simple insoles (6.4 mm thick) each as follow: SRP - Slow Recovery Poron, P - Poron, PPF - Poron+Plastazote (firm) and PPS - Poron+Plastazote (soft). In addition, subjects were also tested with semi-compressed felt (SCF) padding with a 1st metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ) aperture cut-out bilaterally. Minimum, maximum, mean pressure and peak pressure at the hallux, 1st, 2nd, 3rd/4th and 5th MTPJ across both feet were analysed. Repeated measures ANOVA with post hoc Bonferroni paired wise comparison was used to test for any statistical significance at the 95% confidence level for all pressure data. RESULTS: PPF was significant in reducing the minimum (p<0.005) and mean pressure (p<0.03) when compared to BF. This accounted for approximately 28% and 27% pressure reduction in minimum and mean pressure respectively. Peak pressure on the 1st MTPJ locality showed significant reduction of 37% and 29% with the use of SCF (p<0.004) and PPF (p<0.004), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: All 4 commonly used insole materials were able to reduce pressure across the whole foot with PPF achieving significance. Off-loading the 1st MTPJ would still be best achieved with the commonly used plantar metatarsal pad of SCF with the aperture cut-out design. Copyright (c) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Authors: Richard Collings; Jennifer A Freeman; Jos Latour; Patricia Jane Vickery; Sam Glasser; Vasileios Lepesis; Doyo Enki; Joanne Paton Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2019-03-23 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: M T Khan; M O'Sullivan; B Faitli; J E Mellerio; R Fawkes; M Wood; L D Hubbard; A G Harris; L Iacobaccio; T Vlahovic; L James; L Brains; M Fitzpatrick; K Mayre-Chilton Journal: Br J Dermatol Date: 2019-10-23 Impact factor: 9.302
Authors: Ruben Sanchez-Gomez; Alvaro Gomez-Carrion; Carlos Martinez-Sebastian; Luis Alou; David Sevillano; Almudena Nuñez-Fernandez; Paola Sanz-Wozniak; Blanca de la Cruz-Torres Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2022-02-28 Impact factor: 4.241
Authors: Qiu-Qiong Shi; Pui-Ling Li; Kit-Lun Yick; Jiao Jiao; Qi-Long Liu Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-09-30 Impact factor: 4.614