Literature DB >> 20434575

Tissue engineering of cartilage using poly-epsilon-caprolactone nanofiber scaffolds seeded in vivo with periosteal cells.

M E Casper1, J S Fitzsimmons, J J Stone, A O Meza, Y Huang, T J Ruesink, S W O'Driscoll, G G Reinholz.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the potential of periosteal cells to infiltrate poly-epsilon-caprolactone (PCL) nanofiber scaffolds in vivo and subsequently produce cartilage in vitro.
DESIGN: PCL nanofiber scaffolds, with or without chitosan-coating were implanted under periosteum in 6-month-old rabbits. Transforming growth factor-beta1 (TGF-beta1) or vehicle was injected into each implant site. After 1, 3, 5 or 7 days, scaffolds were removed, separated from the periosteum, and the scaffolds and periosteum were cultured separately for 6 weeks under chondrogenic conditions. Sulfated glycosaminoglycan (GAG), type II collagen, DNA content, cartilage yield, and calcium deposition were then analyzed.
RESULTS: Cell infiltration was observed in all scaffolds. Cartilage formation in the uncoated scaffolds increased with duration of implantation (maximum at 7 days). Cells in the uncoated scaffolds implanted for 7 days produced significantly higher levels of both GAG [560 (95% confidence interval (CI), 107-1013) vs 228 (95% CI, 177-278) microg GAG/microg DNA] and cartilage yield [9% (95% CI, 3-14%) vs 0.02% (95% CI, 0-0.22%)] compared to chitosan-coated scaffolds (P=0.006 or less). There was no significant difference in GAG content or cartilage yield between the TGF-beta1-injected and vehicle-injected scaffolds. However, significantly more mineral deposition was detected in TGF-beta1-injected scaffolds compared to vehicle-injected scaffolds (P<0.0001). Cartilage yield from the periosteum, moreover, was significantly increased by subperiosteal TGF-beta1 injections (P<0.001). However, this response was reduced when chitosan-coated scaffolds were implanted.
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that it is possible to seed PCL nanofiber scaffolds with periosteal cells in vivo and subsequently produce engineered cartilage in vitro. Copyright 2010 Osteoarthritis Research Society International. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20434575      PMCID: PMC2900423          DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2010.04.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage        ISSN: 1063-4584            Impact factor:   6.576


  46 in total

1.  Bone and cartilage formation by periosteum; assay of experimental autogenous grafts.

Authors:  J COHEN; P LACROIX
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1955-07       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Method for automated cartilage histomorphometry.

Authors:  S W O'Driscoll; R G Marx; J S Fitzsimmons; D E Beaton
Journal:  Tissue Eng       Date:  1999-02

Review 3.  Chitosan: a versatile biopolymer for orthopaedic tissue-engineering.

Authors:  Alberto Di Martino; Michael Sittinger; Makarand V Risbud
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 12.479

4.  Electrospun PLGA nanofiber scaffolds for articular cartilage reconstruction: mechanical stability, degradation and cellular responses under mechanical stimulation in vitro.

Authors:  Ho Joon Shin; Chang Hun Lee; In Hee Cho; Young-Jick Kim; Yong-Jae Lee; In Ae Kim; Ki-Dong Park; Nobuhiko Yui; Jung-Woog Shin
Journal:  J Biomater Sci Polym Ed       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.517

5.  Chondrocyte phenotype in engineered fibrous matrix is regulated by fiber size.

Authors:  Wan-Ju Li; Yi Jen Jiang; Rocky S Tuan
Journal:  Tissue Eng       Date:  2006-07

6.  Regulation of proliferation and osteochondrogenic differentiation of periosteum-derived cells by transforming growth factor-beta and basic fibroblast growth factor.

Authors:  M Iwasaki; H Nakahara; K Nakata; T Nakase; T Kimura; K Ono
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 7.  Tissue engineering.

Authors:  R Langer; J P Vacanti
Journal:  Science       Date:  1993-05-14       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Articular cartilage engineering with Hyalograft C: 3-year clinical results.

Authors:  Maurilio Marcacci; Massimo Berruto; Domenico Brocchetta; Antonio Delcogliano; Diego Ghinelli; Alberto Gobbi; Elisaveta Kon; Luigi Pederzini; Donato Rosa; Gian Luigi Sacchetti; Giacomo Stefani; Stefano Zanasi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  In vivo mesenchymal cell recruitment by a scaffold loaded with transforming growth factor beta1 and the potential for in situ chondrogenesis.

Authors:  Q Huang; J C H Goh; D W Hutmacher; E H Lee
Journal:  Tissue Eng       Date:  2002-07

10.  A three-dimensional nanofibrous scaffold for cartilage tissue engineering using human mesenchymal stem cells.

Authors:  W-J Wan-Ju Li; Richard Tuli; Chukwuka Okafor; Assia Derfoul; K G Keith G Danielson; D J David J Hall; R S Rocky S Tuan
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 12.479

View more
  8 in total

1.  Molecular Validation of Chondrogenic Differentiation and Hypoxia Responsiveness of Platelet-Lysate Expanded Adipose Tissue-Derived Human Mesenchymal Stromal Cells.

Authors:  Catalina Galeano-Garces; Emily T Camilleri; Scott M Riester; Amel Dudakovic; Dirk R Larson; Wenchun Qu; Jay Smith; Allan B Dietz; Hee-Jeong Im; Aaron J Krych; A Noelle Larson; Marcel Karperien; Andre J van Wijnen
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 2.  Periosteum derived stem cells for regenerative medicine proposals: Boosting current knowledge.

Authors:  Concetta Ferretti; Monica Mattioli-Belmonte
Journal:  World J Stem Cells       Date:  2014-07-26       Impact factor: 5.326

3.  Harnessing cell–biomaterial interactions for osteochondral tissue regeneration.

Authors:  Kyobum Kim; Diana M Yoon; Antonios Mikos; F Kurtis Kasper
Journal:  Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 2.635

4.  Laminin-Coated Poly(Methyl Methacrylate) (PMMA) Nanofiber Scaffold Facilitates the Enrichment of Skeletal Muscle Myoblast Population.

Authors:  Nor Kamalia Zahari; Ruszymah Binti Haji Idrus; Shiplu Roy Chowdhury
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 5.  The Good the Bad and the Ugly of Glycosaminoglycans in Tissue Engineering Applications.

Authors:  Bethanie I Ayerst; Catherine L R Merry; Anthony J Day
Journal:  Pharmaceuticals (Basel)       Date:  2017-06-13

Review 6.  Current State of Cartilage Tissue Engineering using Nanofibrous Scaffolds and Stem Cells.

Authors:  Somaieh Kazemnejad; Manijeh Khanmohammadi; Nafiseh Baheiraei; Shaghayegh Arasteh
Journal:  Avicenna J Med Biotechnol       Date:  2017 Apr-Jun

Review 7.  Blends and Nanocomposite Biomaterials for Articular Cartilage Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Azadehsadat Hashemi Doulabi; Kibret Mequanint; Hadi Mohammadi
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 3.623

Review 8.  Nanoscale and Macroscale Scaffolds with Controlled-Release Polymeric Systems for Dental Craniomaxillofacial Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Saeed Ur Rahman; Malvika Nagrath; Sasikumar Ponnusamy; Praveen R Arany
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 3.623

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.