Literature DB >> 20434087

Normalizing birth in England: a qualitative study.

Holly Powell Kennedy1, Jane Grant, Cathy Walton, Jenna Shaw-Battista, Jane Sandall.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: This study examined factors that foster or hinder the support of normal birth in two English National Health Service Trusts identified for public recognition of their work to normalize birth.
METHODS: This interpretative qualitative study was guided by institutional ethnographic and narrative methods. Purposive sampling was conducted to achieve maximal variation across social, demographic, cultural and ethnic groups. In-depth interviews explored clinician's and women's views and experiences of normal birth. Ethnographic observations of practice, clinical and administrative meetings, educational sessions, and informal discussions were conducted over 6 months at one of the maternity settings. Antenatal and intrapartum clinical guidelines were reviewed and analyzed.
RESULTS: Three key strategies supported the normalization of birth: 1) an "ethos" of normality; 2) "working" the evidence; and 3) "trusting" women to make informed choices best for them. Inappropriate use of technology, disregarding risk status when assigning women to units, lack of physician preparation in normal birth, and poor staffing levels were cited as barriers. DISCUSSION: These strategies should be carefully examined for translation to the United States and future research. Copyright (c) 2010 American College of Nurse-Midwives. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20434087     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmwh.2010.01.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health        ISSN: 1526-9523            Impact factor:   2.388


  8 in total

1.  Supporting Healthy and Normal Physiologic Childbirth: A Consensus Statement by ACNM, MANA, and NACPM.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2013

2.  Socio-Cultural Beliefs, Values and Traditions Regarding Women's Preferred Mode of Birth in the North of Iran.

Authors:  Robab Latifnejad Roudsari; Maryam Zakerihamidi; Effat Merghati Khoei
Journal:  Int J Community Based Nurs Midwifery       Date:  2015-07

3.  Cultural perceptions and preferences of Iranian women regarding cesarean delivery.

Authors:  Robab Latifnejad-Roudsari; Maryam Zakerihamidi; Effat Merghati-Khoei; Anoshirvan Kazemnejad
Journal:  Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res       Date:  2014-02

4.  Fear, Risk, and the Responsible Choice: Risk Narratives and Lowering the Rate of Caesarean Sections in High-income Countries.

Authors:  Helga Hallgrimsdottir; Leah Shumka; Catherine Althaus; Cecilia Benoit
Journal:  AIMS Public Health       Date:  2017-12-26

Review 5.  Interventions targeted at health professionals to reduce unnecessary caesarean sections: a qualitative evidence synthesis.

Authors:  Carol Kingdon; Soo Downe; Ana Pilar Betran
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-12-16       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Obesity and normal birth: A qualitative study of clinician's management of obese pregnant women during labour.

Authors:  Angela Kerrigan; Carol Kingdon; Helen Cheyne
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 3.007

7.  Non-clinical interventions to reduce unnecessary caesarean section targeted at organisations, facilities and systems: Systematic review of qualitative studies.

Authors:  Carol Kingdon; Soo Downe; Ana Pilar Betran
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Transfers of Care between Healthcare Professionals in Obstetric Units of Different Sizes across Spain and in a Hospital in Ireland: The MidconBirth Study.

Authors:  Anna Martín-Arribas; Rafael Vila-Candel; Rhona O'Connell; Martina Dillon; Inmaculada Vila-Bellido; M Ángeles Beneyto; Inmaculada De Molina-Fernández; Nerea Rodríguez-Conesa; Cristina González-Blázquez; Ramón Escuriet
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-11-13       Impact factor: 3.390

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.