Literature DB >> 20434081

Pregnancy and labour in the Dutch maternity care system: what is normal? The role division between midwives and obstetricians.

Marianne P Amelink-Verburg1, Simone E Buitendijk.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: In the Dutch maternity care system, the role division between independently practising midwives (who take care of normal pregnancy and childbirth) and obstetricians (who care for pathologic pregnancy and childbirth) has been established in the so-called "List of Obstetric Indications"(LOI). The LOI designates the most appropriate care provider for women with defined medical or obstetric conditions.
METHODS: This descriptive study analysed the evolution of the concept of "normality" by comparing the development and the contents of the consecutive versions of the LOI from 1958 onwards. The results were related to data from available Dutch national databases concerning maternity care.
RESULTS: The number of conditions defined in the successive lists increased from 39 in 1958 to 143 in 2003. In the course of time, the nature and the content of many indications changed, as did the assignment to the most appropriate care provider. The basic assumptions of the Dutch maternity care system remained stable: the conviction that pregnancy and childbirth fundamentally are physiologic processes, the strong position of the independently practising midwife, and the choice between home or hospital birth for low-risk women. Nevertheless, the odds of the obstetrician being involved in the birth process increased from 24.7% in 1964 to 59.4% in 2002, whereas the role of the primary care provider decreased correspondingly. DISCUSSION: Multidisciplinary research is urgently needed to better determine the risk status and the optimal type of care and care provider for each individual woman in her specific situation, taking into account the risk of both under- and over-treatment. Safely keeping women in primary care could be considered one of a midwife's interventions, just as a referral to secondary care may be. The art of midwifery and risk selection is to balance both interventions, in order to end up with the optimal result for mother and child. Copyright (c) 2010 American College of Nurse-Midwives. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20434081     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmwh.2010.01.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health        ISSN: 1526-9523            Impact factor:   2.388


  26 in total

1.  Planning is not equivalent to preparing, how Dutch women perceive their pregnancy planning in relation to preconceptional lifestyle behaviour change - a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Veronique Y F Maas; Marjolein Poels; Marleen H de Kievit; Anniek P Hartog; Arie Franx; Maria P H Koster
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 3.105

2.  Pregnancy and liver adenoma management: PALM-study.

Authors:  Susanna M van Aalten; Mirelle E E Bröker; J J V Busschbach; Harry J de Koning; Robert A de Man; Eric A P Steegers; Ewout W Steyerberg; Turkan Terkivatan; Jan N M Ijzermans
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 3.067

3.  Variation in referrals to secondary obstetrician-led care among primary midwifery care practices in the Netherlands: a nationwide cohort study.

Authors:  Pien M Offerhaus; Caroline Geerts; Ank de Jonge; Chantal W P M Hukkelhoven; Jos W R Twisk; Antoine L M Lagro-Janssen
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-02-21       Impact factor: 3.007

4.  Clinicians' views of factors of importance for improving the rate of VBAC (vaginal birth after caesarean section): a qualitative study from countries with high VBAC rates.

Authors:  Ingela Lundgren; Evelien van Limbeek; Katri Vehvilainen-Julkunen; Christina Nilsson
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 3.007

5.  Continuity of care: what matters to women when they are referred from primary to secondary care during labour? a qualitative interview study in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Ank de Jonge; Rosan Stuijt; Iva Eijke; Marjan J Westerman
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  The association of ethnic minority density with late entry into antenatal care in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Anke G Posthumus; Vera L N Schölmerich; Eric A P Steegers; Ichiro Kawachi; Semiha Denktaş
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Effectiveness of score card-based antenatal risk selection, care pathways, and multidisciplinary consultation in the Healthy Pregnancy 4 All study (HP4ALL): study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Amber A Vos; Sabine F van Voorst; Adja J M Waelput; Lieke C de Jong-Potjer; Gouke J Bonsel; Eric A P Steegers; Semiha Denktaş
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 2.279

8.  Differences in perinatal morbidity and mortality on the neighbourhood level in Dutch municipalities: a population based cohort study.

Authors:  Amber A Vos; Semiha Denktaş; Gerard J J M Borsboom; Gouke J Bonsel; Eric A P Steegers
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 3.007

9.  Improving interprofessional coordination in Dutch midwifery and obstetrics: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Vera L N Schölmerich; Anke G Posthumus; Halleh Ghorashi; Adja J M Waelput; Peter Groenewegen; Semiha Denktaş
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 3.007

10.  Design and outline of the Healthy Pregnancy 4 All study.

Authors:  Semiha Denktaş; Jashvant Poeran; Sabine F van Voorst; Amber A Vos; Lieke C de Jong-Potjer; Adja J M Waelput; Erwin Birnie; Gouke J Bonsel; Eric A P Steegers
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 3.007

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.