Literature DB >> 20434024

Summary-of-findings tables in Cochrane reviews improved understanding and rapid retrieval of key information.

Sarah E Rosenbaum1, Claire Glenton, Andrew D Oxman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To measure the effects of a summary-of-findings (SoF) table on user satisfaction, understanding, and time spent finding key results in a Cochrane review. STUDY DESIGN AND
SETTING: We randomized participants in an evidence-based practice workshop (randomized controlled trial [RCT] I) and a Cochrane Collaboration entities meeting (RCT II) to receive a Cochrane review with or without an SoF table. In RCT I, we measured user satisfaction. In RCT II, we measured correct comprehension and time spent finding key results.
RESULTS: RCT I: Participants with the SoF table (n=47) were more likely to "agree" or "strongly agree" that it was easy to find results for important outcomes than (n=25) participants without the SoF table-68% vs. 40% (P=0.021). RCT II: Participants with the SoF table (n=18) were more likely to correctly answer two questions regarding results than (n=15) those without the SoF table: 93% vs. 44% (P=0.003) and 87% vs. 11% (P<0.001). Participants with the SoF table spent an average of 90 seconds to find key information compared with 4 minutes for participants without the SoF table (P=0.002).
CONCLUSION: In two small trials, we found that inclusion of an SoF table in a review improved understanding and rapid retrieval of key findings compared with reviews with no SoF table.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20434024     DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.12.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol        ISSN: 0895-4356            Impact factor:   6.437


  50 in total

1.  Evidence summaries tailored to health policy-makers in low- and middle-income countries.

Authors:  Sarah E Rosenbaum; Claire Glenton; Charles Shey Wiysonge; Edgardo Abalos; Luciano Mignini; Taryn Young; Fernando Althabe; Agustín Ciapponi; Sebastian Garcia Marti; Qingyue Meng; Jian Wang; Ana Maria De la Hoz Bradford; Suzanne N Kiwanuka; Elizeus Rutebemberwa; George W Pariyo; Signe Flottorp; Andrew D Oxman
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 9.408

Review 2.  The COMET Handbook: version 1.0.

Authors:  Paula R Williamson; Douglas G Altman; Heather Bagley; Karen L Barnes; Jane M Blazeby; Sara T Brookes; Mike Clarke; Elizabeth Gargon; Sarah Gorst; Nicola Harman; Jamie J Kirkham; Angus McNair; Cecilia A C Prinsen; Jochen Schmitt; Caroline B Terwee; Bridget Young
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 2.279

3.  From authority recommendations to fact-sheets--a future for guidelines.

Authors:  I Mühlhauser
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2010-08-29       Impact factor: 10.122

4.  Identifying content to improve risk assessment communications within the Risk Profile: Literature reviews and focus groups with expert and non-expert stakeholders.

Authors:  C Ellermann; M McDowell; C O Schirren; A-K Lindemann; S Koch; M Lohmann; M A Jenny
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Improving the relevance and consistency of outcomes in comparative effectiveness research.

Authors:  Sean R Tunis; Mike Clarke; Sarah L Gorst; Elizabeth Gargon; Jane M Blazeby; Douglas G Altman; Paula R Williamson
Journal:  J Comp Eff Res       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 1.744

6.  Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider.

Authors:  Paula R Williamson; Douglas G Altman; Jane M Blazeby; Mike Clarke; Declan Devane; Elizabeth Gargon; Peter Tugwell
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2012-08-06       Impact factor: 2.279

7.  Development of two shortened systematic review formats for clinicians.

Authors:  Laure Perrier; Nav Persaud; Anita Ko; Monika Kastner; Jeremy Grimshaw; K Ann McKibbon; Sharon E Straus
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 7.327

8.  Decision boxes for clinicians to support evidence-based practice and shared decision making: the user experience.

Authors:  Anik Giguere; France Légaré; Roland Grad; Pierre Pluye; R Brian Haynes; Michel Cauchon; François Rousseau; Juliana Alvarez Argote; Michel Labrecque
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2012-08-03       Impact factor: 7.327

9.  Can a core outcome set improve the quality of systematic reviews?--a survey of the Co-ordinating Editors of Cochrane Review Groups.

Authors:  Jamie J Kirkham; Elizabeth Gargon; Mike Clarke; Paula R Williamson
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2013-01-22       Impact factor: 2.279

10.  Policymakers' and other stakeholders' perceptions of key considerations for health system decisions and the presentation of evidence to inform those considerations: an international survey.

Authors:  Joshua P Vogel; Andrew D Oxman; Claire Glenton; Sarah Rosenbaum; Simon Lewin; A Metin Gülmezoglu; João Paulo Souza
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2013-05-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.