Literature DB >> 20433871

Corticospinal excitability during observation and imagery of simple and complex hand tasks: implications for motor rehabilitation.

Meyke Roosink1, Inge Zijdewind.   

Abstract

Movement observation and imagery are increasingly propagandized for motor rehabilitation. Both observation and imagery are thought to improve motor function through repeated activation of mental motor representations. However, it is unknown what stimulation parameters or imagery conditions are optimal for rehabilitation purposes. A better understanding of the mechanisms underlying movement observation and imagery is essential for the optimization of functional outcome using these training conditions. This study systematically assessed the corticospinal excitability during rest, observation, imagery and execution of a simple and a complex finger-tapping sequence in healthy controls using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Observation was conducted passively (without prior instructions) as well as actively (in order to imitate). Imagery was performed visually and kinesthetically. A larger increase in corticospinal excitability was found during active observation in comparison with passive observation and visual or kinesthetic imagery. No significant difference between kinesthetic and visual imagery was found. Overall, the complex task led to a higher corticospinal excitability in comparison with the simple task. In conclusion, the corticospinal excitability was modulated during both movement observation and imagery. Specifically, active observation of a complex motor task resulted in increased corticospinal excitability. Active observation may be more effective than imagery for motor rehabilitation purposes. In addition, the activation of mental motor representations may be optimized by varying task-complexity. (c) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20433871     DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2010.04.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Res        ISSN: 0166-4328            Impact factor:   3.332


  36 in total

1.  Self-selected conscious strategies do not modulate motor cortical output during action observation.

Authors:  Katherine R Naish; Sukhvinder S Obhi
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Differential cortical activation during observation and observation-and-imagination.

Authors:  H I Berends; R Wolkorte; M J Ijzerman; M J A M van Putten
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-06-16       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 3.  Role of the mirror-neuron system in cross-education.

Authors:  Tjerk Zult; Glyn Howatson; Endre E Kádár; Jonathan P Farthing; Tibor Hortobágyi
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  The BDNF val(66)met polymorphism is not related to motor function or short-term cortical plasticity in elderly subjects.

Authors:  Stephanie A McHughen; Steven C Cramer
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 3.252

5.  Weight dependent modulation of motor resonance induced by weight estimation during observation of partially occluded lifting actions.

Authors:  Nikola Valchev; Inge Zijdewind; Christian Keysers; Valeria Gazzola; Alessio Avenanti; Natasha M Maurits
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Imagining is Not Doing but Involves Specific Motor Commands: A Review of Experimental Data Related to Motor Inhibition.

Authors:  Aymeric Guillot; Franck Di Rienzo; Tadhg Macintyre; Aidan Moran; Christian Collet
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  The modulation of corticospinal excitability during motor imagery of actions with objects.

Authors:  Nobuaki Mizuguchi; Masanori Sakamoto; Tetsuro Muraoka; Kento Nakagawa; Shoichi Kanazawa; Hiroki Nakata; Noriyoshi Moriyama; Kazuyuki Kanosue
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-10-13       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Cortico-Cortical Connectivity between Right Parietal and Bilateral Primary Motor Cortices during Imagined and Observed Actions: A Combined TMS/tDCS Study.

Authors:  Matteo Feurra; Giovanni Bianco; Nicola R Polizzotto; Iglis Innocenti; Alessandro Rossi; Simone Rossi
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 3.492

9.  Interhemispheric inhibition during mental actions of different complexity.

Authors:  Nicolas Gueugneau; Marco Bove; Laura Avanzino; Agnès Jacquin; Thierry Pozzo; Charalambos Papaxanthis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-25       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Je pense donc je fais: transcranial direct current stimulation modulates brain oscillations associated with motor imagery and movement observation.

Authors:  Olivia M Lapenta; Ludovico Minati; Felipe Fregni; Paulo S Boggio
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.