Literature DB >> 20432735

Urine immunocytology as a noninvasive diagnostic tool for acute kidney rejection: a single center experience.

Karlo Mihovilović1, Ika Kardum-Skelin, Danica Ljubanović, Mirjana Sabljar-Matovinović, Zeljko Vidas, Mladen Knotek.   

Abstract

Renal biopsy is a gold standard for establishing diagnosis of acute rejection of the renal allograft. However, being invasive, renal biopsy has potential significant complications and contraindications. Therefore, possibility to noninvasively diagnose acute rejection would improve follow-up of kidney transplant patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate urine immunocytology for T cells as a method for noninvasive identification of patients with acute renal allograft rejection in comparison to renal biopsy. In this prospective study a cohort of 56 kidney, or kidney-pancreas transplant recipients was included. Patients either received their transplant at the University Hospital "Merkur", or have been followed at the "Merkur" Hospital. Patients were subject to either protocol or indication kidney biopsy (a total of 70 biopsies), with simultaneous urine immunocytology (determination of CD3-positive cells in the urine sediment). Acute rejection was diagnosed in 24 biopsies. 23 episodes were T-cell mediated (6 grade IA, 5 grade IB, 1 grade IIA, 1 grade III and 10 borderline), while in 1 case acute humoral rejection was diagnosed. 46 biopsies did not demonstrate acute rejection. CD3-positive cells were found in 21% of cases with acute rejection and in 13% of cases without rejection (n.s.). A finding of CD3-positive cells in urine had a sensitivity of 21% and specificity of 87% for acute rejection (including borderline), with positive predictive value of 45% and negative predictive value of 68%. Although tubulitis is a hallmark of acute T cell-mediated rejection, detection of T cells in urine sediment was insufficiently sensitive and insufficiently specific for diagnosing acute rejection in our cohort of kidney transplant recipients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20432735

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Coll Antropol        ISSN: 0350-6134


  3 in total

Review 1.  [Urine cytology - update 2013. A systematic review of recent literature].

Authors:  M Böhm; F vom Dorp; M Schostak; O W Hakenberg
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Renal graft biopsy assists diagnosis and treatment of renal allograft dysfunction after kidney transplantation: a report of 106 cases.

Authors:  Yong Han; Hui Guo; Ming Cai; Li Xiao; Qiang Wang; Xiaoguang Xu; Haiyan Huang; Bingyi Shi
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-03-15

3.  Evaluation of the appropriate time period between sampling and analyzing for automated urinalysis.

Authors:  Ramona C Dolscheid-Pommerich; Ute Klarmann-Schulz; Rupert Conrad; Birgit Stoffel-Wagner; Berndt Zur
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.313

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.