Literature DB >> 20432207

"Transmural air leak": a computed tomographic finding following endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastric tumors.

F Onogi1, H Araki, T Ibuka, Y Manabe, K Yamazaki, S Nishiwaki, H Moriwaki.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: A small amount of free air, visible on CT but not on plain chest radiography, which appeared following endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) of a gastric neoplasm without endoscopically visible perforation, was defined as a "transmural air leak", and a prospective, consecutive entry study was performed to determine its incidence and clinical significance. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 2006 and September 2008, ESD was performed for 246 gastric lesions in 246 consecutive patients. Abdominal CT scan was performed 1 day after ESD. In addition, chest radiography and blood biochemistry tests were performed at different time points before and after ESD.
RESULTS: Two hundred and nineteen lesions (89 %) were curatively removed by ESD. Among the total of 246 patients, we encountered endoscopically visible perforation during ESD in 2 patients (0.8 %), and clinically suspected perforation diagnosed by the presence of free air on chest radiography but invisible during ESD in 3 patients (1 %), while transmural air leak was observed in another 33 (13 %). Air leak occurred in cases where resection size was larger, procedure time longer, and the muscularis propria on the ulcer base was exposed at the end of ESD. Patients with air leaks developed pyrexia at a higher rate than those without (36 % vs. 16 %, P = 0.018). These patients recovered with antibiotics and required no endoscopic or surgical intervention. The presence of an air leak did not affect the duration of hospital stay.
CONCLUSIONS: A transmural air leak was observed in 13 % of the patients undergoing ESD. Larger resection size, prolonged procedure time, and exposure of the muscularis propria on the ulcer base were risk factors for transmural air leak, but the outcome of patients with this complication was good. Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart.New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20432207     DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1244013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   10.093


  19 in total

1.  Management of bleeding and artificial gastric ulcers associated with endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Authors:  Yosuke Muraki; Shotaro Enomoto; Mikitaka Iguchi; Mitsuhiro Fujishiro; Naohisa Yahagi; Masao Ichinose
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2012-01-16

2.  Management and associated factors of delayed perforation after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Authors:  Haruhisa Suzuki; Ichiro Oda; Masau Sekiguchi; Seiichiro Abe; Satoru Nonaka; Shigetaka Yoshinaga; Takeshi Nakajima; Yutaka Saito
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-11-28       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  The efficacy of topical bupivacaine and triamcinolone acetonide injection in the relief of pain after endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric neoplasia: a randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  Bun Kim; Hyuk Lee; Hyunsoo Chung; Jun Chul Park; Sung Kwan Shin; Sang Kil Lee; Yong Chan Lee
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Clinical significance of intraperitoneal air on computed tomography scan after endoscopic submucosal dissection in patients with gastric neoplasms.

Authors:  Soo-Jeong Cho; Il Ju Choi; Soo Jin Kim; Min Ju Kim; Chan Gyoo Kim; Jong Yeul Lee; Keun Won Ryu; Young-Woo Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-09-10       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Clinical outcomes of and management strategy for perforations associated with endoscopic submucosal dissection of an upper gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasm.

Authors:  Hyun Ju Kim; Hyunsoo Chung; Da Hyun Jung; Jun Chul Park; Sung Kwan Shin; Sang Kil Lee; Yong Chan Lee
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Risk factors for perforations associated with endoscopic submucosal dissection in gastric lesions: emphasis on perforation type.

Authors:  Jun Hwan Yoo; Sung Jae Shin; Kee Myung Lee; Jae Myoung Choi; Jeong Ook Wi; Dong Hoon Kim; Sun Gyo Lim; Jae Chul Hwang; Jae Youn Cheong; Byung Moo Yoo; Kwang Jae Lee; Jin Hong Kim; Sung Won Cho
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Clinical features and predictive factors of coagulation syndrome after endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric neoplasm.

Authors:  Hyuk Lee; Kyung Seok Cheoi; Hyunsoo Chung; Jun Chul Park; Sung Kwan Shin; Sang Kil Lee; Yong Chan Lee
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2011-07-15       Impact factor: 7.370

8.  Predictive Factors for Pain After Endoscopic Resection of Gastric Tumors.

Authors:  Seung Young Kim; Sung Woo Jung; Jung Wan Choe; Jong Jin Hyun; Young Kul Jung; Ja Seol Koo; Hyung Joon Yim; Sang Woo Lee
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 3.199

9.  The efficacy of single-dose postoperative intravenous dexamethasone for pain relief after endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric neoplasm.

Authors:  Hye Won Lee; Hyuk Lee; Hyunsoo Chung; Jun Chul Park; Sung Kwan Shin; Sang Kil Lee; Young Chan Lee; Jung Hwa Hong; Dong Wook Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Clinical outcomes and risk factors for perforation in gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection: A prospective pilot study.

Authors:  Jiro Watari; Toshihiko Tomita; Fumihiko Toyoshima; Jun Sakurai; Takashi Kondo; Haruki Asano; Takahisa Yamasaki; Takuya Okugawa; Hisatomo Ikehara; Tadayuki Oshima; Hirokazu Fukui; Hiroto Miwa
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2013-06-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.