Literature DB >> 20432082

Phoning while driving I: a review of epidemiological, psychological, behavioural and physiological studies.

C Collet1, A Guillot, C Petit.   

Abstract

The impact of cell (mobile) phone use on driving performance has been widely questioned for 20 years. This paper reviews the literature to evaluate the extent to which phoning may impact behaviour with a risk to affect safety. After analysing epidemiological studies that give an overview of cell phone use, this paper examines the experimental results and focuses on variables showing that driving is impacted by holding a mobile-phone conversation. Information processing (e.g. reaction time and detection rate of cues related to driving information) and variables associated with vehicle control (e.g. lane-keeping, headway and vehicle speed) seem the most relevant. Although less studied than behavioural indices, physiological data give information about the supplementary potential strain that the driver may undergo under dual-task conditions. This first part of the review highlights common findings, questionable results and differences among studies, which originate from specific experimental designs with particular dependent variables, i.e. self-report, behavioural and physiological indicators. Finally, how drivers try to compensate for the additional load brought by phone use is described. STATEMENT OF RELEVANCE: The two papers review the influence of mobile-phone use on driving performance. While there is ample evidence that this dual task is likely to increase the risk of car crash, the review analyses the variables eliciting detrimental conditions and, conversely, those that may preserve acceptable conditions for safety, close to usual driving. The decision of answering or initiating a cell phone call while driving depends upon the complex interaction among several variables, including driving conditions and driver's own characteristics. In addition, this decision remains under driver's awareness of being able or not to manage the two tasks simultaneously.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20432082     DOI: 10.1080/00140131003672023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ergonomics        ISSN: 0014-0139            Impact factor:   2.778


  12 in total

1.  Distraction and pedestrian safety: how talking on the phone, texting, and listening to music impact crossing the street.

Authors:  David C Schwebel; Despina Stavrinos; Katherine W Byington; Tiffany Davis; Elizabeth E O'Neal; Desiree de Jong
Journal:  Accid Anal Prev       Date:  2011-08-09

Review 2.  Associations between driving performance and engaging in secondary tasks: a systematic review.

Authors:  Alva O Ferdinand; Nir Menachemi
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Recording and automated analysis of naturalistic bioptic driving.

Authors:  Gang Luo; Eli Peli
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2011-03-16       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Cell phone use while driving laws and motor vehicle driver fatalities: differences in population subgroups and location.

Authors:  Toni M Rudisill; Haitao Chu; Motao Zhu
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 3.797

5.  Who actually receives cell phone use while driving citations and how much are these laws enforced among states? A descriptive, cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Toni M Rudisill; Motao Zhu
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Hand-held cell phone use while driving legislation and observed driver behavior among population sub-groups in the United States.

Authors:  Toni M Rudisill; Motao Zhu
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  Identifying the Causes of Drivers' Hazardous States Using Driver Characteristics, Vehicle Kinematics, and Physiological Measurements.

Authors:  Ali Darzi; Sherif M Gaweesh; Mohamed M Ahmed; Domen Novak
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 4.677

8.  Association between cellphone use while driving legislation and self-reported behaviour among adult drivers in USA: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Toni Marie Rudisill; Motao Zhu; Haitao Chu
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-02-18       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Impact of social and technological distraction on pedestrian crossing behaviour: an observational study.

Authors:  Leah L Thompson; Frederick P Rivara; Rajiv C Ayyagari; Beth E Ebel
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 2.399

10.  Cellphone Legislation and Self-Reported Behaviors Among Subgroups of Adolescent U.S. Drivers.

Authors:  Toni M Rudisill; Gordon Smith; Haitao Chu; Motao Zhu
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 5.012

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.