Literature DB >> 20431306

[Adjuvant therapy in colon cancer].

Anke Reinacher-Schick1, Dirk Arnold, Tanja Trarbach, Karsten Ridwelski, Hans-Peter Bruch, Thomas Kirchner, Stefan Kubicka, Hans-Joachim Schmoll.   

Abstract

The goal of improving adjuvant treatment can be reached in two ways: firstly, by developing more effective drugs and protocols and, secondly, by selecting suitable patients on the basis of clinical and molecular factors. In UICC (Union internationale contre le cancer) stage II, microsatellite instability (MSI) is a strong prognostic factor. Whether it can also be used as a predictive marker is currently a matter of controversy because the available data are contradictory. The question whether or not the MSI status should be checked before treatment decisions are made in stage II patients can therefore not be clearly answered at present. For adjuvant treatment in stage III, with capecitabine/oxaliplatin (XELOX) there is now a new protocol available that is based on the orally administered prodrug capecitabine. With regard to the question of how much older patients in this stage may also benefit from a combination chemotherapy, new--and contradictory--data have emerged recently: firstly, preliminary results of two new studies have given rise to safety concerns and, secondly, an analysis by the 'ACCENT Collaborative Group' indicated lower efficacy of the 'newer' adjuvant protocols in older people. These findings, however, have now been called into question as a result of a new subgroup analysis from the XELOXA study. The expert group therefore recommended that the decision whether to treat patients older than 70 years with an (oral) fluoropyrimidine alone or in combination with oxaliplatin should be based on clinical parameters such as biological age and comorbidities. Copyright (c) 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20431306     DOI: 10.1159/000308436

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Onkologie        ISSN: 0378-584X


  2 in total

1.  [Differential diagnostics of hereditary colorectal cancer syndromes. The role of pathology].

Authors:  J Rüschoff; E Heinmöller; A Hartmann; R Büttner; T Rau
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.011

2.  Clinical Significance of Fusobacterium nucleatum and Microsatellite Instability in Evaluating Colorectal Cancer Prognosis.

Authors:  Qiaoxin Zhang; Yong Xia; Yanxuan Xie; Xiaoyang Jiao; Mi Zeng; Zhiqiang Fan; Xin Li; Yumeng Yuan
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2022-10-18       Impact factor: 3.602

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.