INTRODUCTION: We conducted a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of oral cavity, esophageal, stomach, small intestine, colon, and rectal cancers among workers occupationally exposed to Cr(VI). METHODS: Using PubMed, studies published from 1950 to 2009 evaluating the relationship between Cr(VI) exposure and GI cancers were identified. Measures of effect and variability were extracted from 32 studies meeting specific inclusion criteria, and meta-analysis summary relative risk measures were calculated using random effects models and inverse variance weighting methods. RESULTS: Meta-standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) were, for cancer of the: oral cavity [1.02 (95% CI=0.77-1.34)]; esophagus [1.17 (95% CI=0.90-1.51)]; stomach [1.09 (95% CI=0.93-1.28)]; colon [0.89 (95% CI=0.70-1.12)]; and rectum [1.17 (95% CI=0.98-1.39)]. Analyses of more highly exposed subgroups included in the studies or subgroups based on geographic region or by industry with recognized Cr(VI) exposures (welding, chrome plating, chromate production, and pigment production) did not result in elevated meta-SMRs except for esophageal cancer among US cohorts [meta-SMR=1.49 (95% CI=1.06-2.09)]. However, that finding was based on a subgroup of only four studies, one of which was a PMR study. Potential confounding by socioeconomic status (SES), diet and/or smoking, or limitations due to the healthy-worker effect (HWE) were evaluated, and while smoking, diet and SES may be important factors that may have upwardly biased the meta-SMRs, HWE is not likely to have significantly affected the summary results. None of three studies reporting small intestine cancers observed a statistically significant increased risk. DISCUSSION: These meta-analyses and literature review indicate that Cr(VI)-exposed workers are not at a greater risk of GI cancers than the general population.
INTRODUCTION: We conducted a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of oral cavity, esophageal, stomach, small intestine, colon, and rectal cancers among workers occupationally exposed to Cr(VI). METHODS: Using PubMed, studies published from 1950 to 2009 evaluating the relationship between Cr(VI) exposure and GI cancers were identified. Measures of effect and variability were extracted from 32 studies meeting specific inclusion criteria, and meta-analysis summary relative risk measures were calculated using random effects models and inverse variance weighting methods. RESULTS: Meta-standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) were, for cancer of the: oral cavity [1.02 (95% CI=0.77-1.34)]; esophagus [1.17 (95% CI=0.90-1.51)]; stomach [1.09 (95% CI=0.93-1.28)]; colon [0.89 (95% CI=0.70-1.12)]; and rectum [1.17 (95% CI=0.98-1.39)]. Analyses of more highly exposed subgroups included in the studies or subgroups based on geographic region or by industry with recognized Cr(VI) exposures (welding, chrome plating, chromate production, and pigment production) did not result in elevated meta-SMRs except for esophageal cancer among US cohorts [meta-SMR=1.49 (95% CI=1.06-2.09)]. However, that finding was based on a subgroup of only four studies, one of which was a PMR study. Potential confounding by socioeconomic status (SES), diet and/or smoking, or limitations due to the healthy-worker effect (HWE) were evaluated, and while smoking, diet and SES may be important factors that may have upwardly biased the meta-SMRs, HWE is not likely to have significantly affected the summary results. None of three studies reporting small intestine cancers observed a statistically significant increased risk. DISCUSSION: These meta-analyses and literature review indicate that Cr(VI)-exposed workers are not at a greater risk of GI cancers than the general population.
Authors: Michael A O'Rorke; Marie M Cantwell; Christian C Abnet; And John D Brockman; Liam J Murray Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2012-03-06 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Nancy Johnson; Brent J Shelton; Claudia Hopenhayn; Thomas T Tucker; Jason M Unrine; Bin Huang; W Christian; Zhuo Zhang; Xianglin Shi; Li Li Journal: J Environ Pathol Toxicol Oncol Date: 2011 Impact factor: 3.567
Authors: Xin Wang; Ardhendu K Mandal; Hiroshi Saito; Joseph F Pulliam; Eun Y Lee; Zun-Ji Ke; Jian Lu; Songze Ding; Li Li; Brent J Shelton; Thomas Tucker; B Mark Evers; Zhuo Zhang; Xianglin Shi Journal: Toxicol Appl Pharmacol Date: 2012-04-19 Impact factor: 4.219
Authors: Bitew K Dessie; Bewketu Mehari; Sirak Robele Gari; Adane Mihret; Adey F Desta; Samuel Melaku; Tena Alamirew; Claire L Walsh; David Werner; Gete Zeleke Journal: Biol Trace Elem Res Date: 2022-03-02 Impact factor: 3.738
Authors: Muhammad Junaid; Muhammad Zaffar Hashmi; Riffat Naseem Malik; De-Sheng Pei Journal: Environ Sci Pollut Res Int Date: 2016-08-25 Impact factor: 4.223
Authors: Chad M Thompson; Deborah M Proctor; Mina Suh; Laurie C Haws; Christopher R Kirman; Mark A Harris Journal: Crit Rev Toxicol Date: 2013-03 Impact factor: 5.635