Literature DB >> 20430714

Occupational exposure to hexavalent chromium and cancers of the gastrointestinal tract: a meta-analysis.

Nicole M Gatto1, Michael A Kelsh, Diem Ha Mai, Mina Suh, Deborah M Proctor.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: We conducted a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of oral cavity, esophageal, stomach, small intestine, colon, and rectal cancers among workers occupationally exposed to Cr(VI).
METHODS: Using PubMed, studies published from 1950 to 2009 evaluating the relationship between Cr(VI) exposure and GI cancers were identified. Measures of effect and variability were extracted from 32 studies meeting specific inclusion criteria, and meta-analysis summary relative risk measures were calculated using random effects models and inverse variance weighting methods.
RESULTS: Meta-standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) were, for cancer of the: oral cavity [1.02 (95% CI=0.77-1.34)]; esophagus [1.17 (95% CI=0.90-1.51)]; stomach [1.09 (95% CI=0.93-1.28)]; colon [0.89 (95% CI=0.70-1.12)]; and rectum [1.17 (95% CI=0.98-1.39)]. Analyses of more highly exposed subgroups included in the studies or subgroups based on geographic region or by industry with recognized Cr(VI) exposures (welding, chrome plating, chromate production, and pigment production) did not result in elevated meta-SMRs except for esophageal cancer among US cohorts [meta-SMR=1.49 (95% CI=1.06-2.09)]. However, that finding was based on a subgroup of only four studies, one of which was a PMR study. Potential confounding by socioeconomic status (SES), diet and/or smoking, or limitations due to the healthy-worker effect (HWE) were evaluated, and while smoking, diet and SES may be important factors that may have upwardly biased the meta-SMRs, HWE is not likely to have significantly affected the summary results. None of three studies reporting small intestine cancers observed a statistically significant increased risk. DISCUSSION: These meta-analyses and literature review indicate that Cr(VI)-exposed workers are not at a greater risk of GI cancers than the general population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20430714     DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2010.03.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol        ISSN: 1877-7821            Impact factor:   2.984


  23 in total

1.  Toenail trace element status and risk of Barrett's oesophagus and oesophageal adenocarcinoma: results from the FINBAR study.

Authors:  Michael A O'Rorke; Marie M Cantwell; Christian C Abnet; And John D Brockman; Liam J Murray
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 7.396

2.  Concentrations of arsenic, chromium, and nickel in toenail samples from Appalachian Kentucky residents.

Authors:  Nancy Johnson; Brent J Shelton; Claudia Hopenhayn; Thomas T Tucker; Jason M Unrine; Bin Huang; W Christian; Zhuo Zhang; Xianglin Shi; Li Li
Journal:  J Environ Pathol Toxicol Oncol       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 3.567

3.  Arsenic and chromium in drinking water promote tumorigenesis in a mouse colitis-associated colorectal cancer model and the potential mechanism is ROS-mediated Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway.

Authors:  Xin Wang; Ardhendu K Mandal; Hiroshi Saito; Joseph F Pulliam; Eun Y Lee; Zun-Ji Ke; Jian Lu; Songze Ding; Li Li; Brent J Shelton; Thomas Tucker; B Mark Evers; Zhuo Zhang; Xianglin Shi
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 4.219

4.  Biomarkers of oxidative stress in electroplating workers exposed to hexavalent chromium.

Authors:  Chih-Hong Pan; Hueiwang Anna Jeng; Ching-Huang Lai
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 5.563

5.  Trace Element Levels in Nails of Residents of Addis Ababa Are Shaped by Social Factors and Geography.

Authors:  Bitew K Dessie; Bewketu Mehari; Sirak Robele Gari; Adane Mihret; Adey F Desta; Samuel Melaku; Tena Alamirew; Claire L Walsh; David Werner; Gete Zeleke
Journal:  Biol Trace Elem Res       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 3.738

6.  Chromium exposure among children from an electronic waste recycling town of China.

Authors:  Xijin Xu; Taofeek Akangbe Yekeen; Junxiao Liu; Bingrong Zhuang; Weiqiu Li; Xia Huo
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 7.  Toxicity and oxidative stress induced by chromium in workers exposed from different occupational settings around the globe: A review.

Authors:  Muhammad Junaid; Muhammad Zaffar Hashmi; Riffat Naseem Malik; De-Sheng Pei
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 8.  Assessment of the mode of action underlying development of rodent small intestinal tumors following oral exposure to hexavalent chromium and relevance to humans.

Authors:  Chad M Thompson; Deborah M Proctor; Mina Suh; Laurie C Haws; Christopher R Kirman; Mark A Harris
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 5.635

Review 9.  Oral Chromium Exposure and Toxicity.

Authors:  Hong Sun; Jason Brocato; Max Costa
Journal:  Curr Environ Health Rep       Date:  2015-09

Review 10.  Application of the U.S. EPA mode of action Framework for purposes of guiding future research: a case study involving the oral carcinogenicity of hexavalent chromium.

Authors:  Chad M Thompson; Laurie C Haws; Mark A Harris; Nicole M Gatto; Deborah M Proctor
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2010-10-14       Impact factor: 4.849

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.