OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of varying initial bipedal stance width (ISW) on the clinical measurement of unipedal balance time (UBT). DESIGN: Observational, cross-sectional study. SETTING:Academic physiatric outpatient facility. SUBJECTS:Thirty-one clinic subjects with neuromuscular and/or musculoskeletal conditions known to influence mobility and 30 similarly-aged healthy subjects. METHODS: Demographic and clinical information were recorded. UBT was determined under 3 distinct conditions by varying bipedal intermalleolar distance: (1) ISW of 0.3 body height; (2) ISW of 0.05 body height; and (3) ISW of 0 body height. The last was accomplished by subjects assuming unipedal balance while using the hands on a horizontal surface for stabilization. Subjects lifted the contralateral foot (or hands in the case of 0 body height condition) in response to a cadenced command to minimize variation in rate of weight transfer. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: UBT under each of the 3 ISW conditions. RESULTS:Mean UBT increased with decreasing ISW, and the differences were significant when comparing each ISW with the next smaller. Healthy subjects demonstrated greater UBT than clinic subjects at each ISW, but the magnitude of these group differences were similar across ISW condition. A UBT >10 seconds in the 0.3 body height ISW was the best discriminator between clinic and healthy subjects. CONCLUSION: Because UBT varies with ISW, standardization of ISW is necessary for accurate within-subject, and between-subject, comparisons in UBT. Healthy subjects were best differentiated from clinic subjects by UBT >10 seconds in the 0.3 body height ISW condition. Copyright 2010 American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of varying initial bipedal stance width (ISW) on the clinical measurement of unipedal balance time (UBT). DESIGN: Observational, cross-sectional study. SETTING: Academic physiatric outpatient facility. SUBJECTS: Thirty-one clinic subjects with neuromuscular and/or musculoskeletal conditions known to influence mobility and 30 similarly-aged healthy subjects. METHODS: Demographic and clinical information were recorded. UBT was determined under 3 distinct conditions by varying bipedal intermalleolar distance: (1) ISW of 0.3 body height; (2) ISW of 0.05 body height; and (3) ISW of 0 body height. The last was accomplished by subjects assuming unipedal balance while using the hands on a horizontal surface for stabilization. Subjects lifted the contralateral foot (or hands in the case of 0 body height condition) in response to a cadenced command to minimize variation in rate of weight transfer. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: UBT under each of the 3 ISW conditions. RESULTS: Mean UBT increased with decreasing ISW, and the differences were significant when comparing each ISW with the next smaller. Healthy subjects demonstrated greater UBT than clinic subjects at each ISW, but the magnitude of these group differences were similar across ISW condition. A UBT >10 seconds in the 0.3 body height ISW was the best discriminator between clinic and healthy subjects. CONCLUSION: Because UBT varies with ISW, standardization of ISW is necessary for accurate within-subject, and between-subject, comparisons in UBT. Healthy subjects were best differentiated from clinic subjects by UBT >10 seconds in the 0.3 body height ISW condition. Copyright 2010 American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Authors: E M Gutierrez; M D Helber; D Dealva; J A Ashton-Miller; J K Richardson Journal: Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) Date: 2001-07 Impact factor: 2.063
Authors: A G Drusini; G P Eleazer; M Caiazzo; E Veronese; N Carrara; C Ranzato; F Businaro; R Boland; D Wieland Journal: Aging Clin Exp Res Date: 2002-02 Impact factor: 3.636
Authors: Pradeep Suri; Dan K Kiely; Suzanne G Leveille; Walter R Frontera; Jonathan F Bean Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2011-06-02 Impact factor: 3.966