OBJECTIVE: To provide an overview of the literature on the burden of diabetic macular edema (DME) in the United States and selected European countries. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Computerized searches of English-language literature were conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE (1980-2009). The searches were supplemented with electronic and manual searches of relevant society/association proceedings and bibliographies of electronically identified sources. Abstracts were reviewed for relevance to any of the following topics: epidemiology, including prevalence and incidence; health outcomes; resource use and treatment patterns; and economic and humanistic burden associated with DME. Relevant full text articles were retrieved and major findings were synthesized and compared within and across countries. RESULTS: A total of 400 citations were included in the initial review. After abstract screening, 47 articles were deemed pertinent and summarized in this review. The prevalence of DME among diabetic patients ranged from 0.85% to 12.3% across the countries studied. The prevalence and incidence of DME vary depending on type of diabetes (1 vs. 2), insulin- vs. non-insulin-dependence, and duration of disease (years since diagnosis). Although literature findings are limited and indicate a need for further investigation, a synthesis of the available results indicates that DME has a negative impact on patients' health-related quality of life. In addition, patients with DME consume significantly more healthcare resources and incur higher costs compared to diabetic patients without retinal complications. CONCLUSIONS: There remains a need for consistent data capture and assessment within and between countries included in this analysis. Despite the limited evidence, DME appears to be a costly disease that has a negative impact on patients' quality of life.
OBJECTIVE: To provide an overview of the literature on the burden of diabetic macular edema (DME) in the United States and selected European countries. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Computerized searches of English-language literature were conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE (1980-2009). The searches were supplemented with electronic and manual searches of relevant society/association proceedings and bibliographies of electronically identified sources. Abstracts were reviewed for relevance to any of the following topics: epidemiology, including prevalence and incidence; health outcomes; resource use and treatment patterns; and economic and humanistic burden associated with DME. Relevant full text articles were retrieved and major findings were synthesized and compared within and across countries. RESULTS: A total of 400 citations were included in the initial review. After abstract screening, 47 articles were deemed pertinent and summarized in this review. The prevalence of DME among diabeticpatients ranged from 0.85% to 12.3% across the countries studied. The prevalence and incidence of DME vary depending on type of diabetes (1 vs. 2), insulin- vs. non-insulin-dependence, and duration of disease (years since diagnosis). Although literature findings are limited and indicate a need for further investigation, a synthesis of the available results indicates that DME has a negative impact on patients' health-related quality of life. In addition, patients with DME consume significantly more healthcare resources and incur higher costs compared to diabeticpatients without retinal complications. CONCLUSIONS: There remains a need for consistent data capture and assessment within and between countries included in this analysis. Despite the limited evidence, DME appears to be a costly disease that has a negative impact on patients' quality of life.
Authors: F Bandello; J Cunha-Vaz; N V Chong; G E Lang; P Massin; P Mitchell; M Porta; C Prünte; R Schlingemann; U Schmidt-Erfurth Journal: Eye (Lond) Date: 2012-01-13 Impact factor: 3.775
Authors: Joshua D Stein; Paula Anne Newman-Casey; David D Kim; Kristen Harris Nwanyanwu; Mark W Johnson; David W Hutton Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2013-05-01 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Krystal Khoo; Ryan E K Man; Gwyn Rees; Preeti Gupta; Ecosse L Lamoureux; Eva K Fenwick Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2019-03-16 Impact factor: 4.147