Literature DB >> 20429731

Trends in colorectal cancer in the south of the Netherlands 1975-2007: rectal cancer survival levels with colon cancer survival.

Valery Lemmens1, Liza van Steenbergen, Maryska Janssen-Heijnen, Hendrik Martijn, Harm Rutten, Jan Willem Coebergh.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In the Netherlands over 11 200 patients are yearly diagnosed with colorectal cancer (CRC), of who about 4 700 are expected to die of the disease ultimately. Investigating long-term trends is useful for clinicians and policy makers to evaluate the impact of changes in practice and will help predict future developments. PATIENTS: The 26 826 cases of primary CRC (C18.0-C20.9) diagnosed between 1975 and 2007 in the Dutch population-based Eindhoven Cancer Registry area were included. We analysed trends in incidence, prevalence, stage distribution, treatment, survival, and mortality.
RESULTS: The age-standardised incidence of colon carcinoma kept increasing, most markedly in males (up to 39 patients per 100 000 inhabitants) and for tumours of the colon ascendens (subsite-specific incidence doubled). The incidence of rectal carcinoma remained stable. The share of patients aged 80 or older rose from 12 to 19% (p<0.0001). The proportion of patients diagnosed with distant metastases increased up to 25% for colon carcinoma (p<0.0001). Resection rates of the primary tumour remained high except for patients with metastasised disease, showing a decrease since 2000. Recently, the use of adjuvant chemotherapy seemed to level off among patients with stage III colon carcinoma, but the use of neo-adjuvant chemoradiation clearly increased among patients with stage II/III rectal cancer (p<0.0001). Five-year relative survival of colon cancer improved from 51% in 1975-1984 to 58% in 2000-2004, for rectal cancer it improved from 44 to 59%. Two-year relative survival of colon cancer in 2005-2006 was 69%, and 77% for rectal cancer.
CONCLUSIONS: The changes in management of rectal cancer led to a superior increase in survival of these patients compared to patients with colon cancer, even surpassing the latter.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20429731     DOI: 10.3109/02841861003733713

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Oncol        ISSN: 0284-186X            Impact factor:   4.089


  32 in total

1.  PIK3CA kinase domain mutation identifies a subgroup of stage III colon cancer patients with poor prognosis.

Authors:  Arantza Fariña Sarasqueta; Eliane C M Zeestraten; Tom van Wezel; Gesina van Lijnschoten; Ronald van Eijk; Jan Willem T Dekker; Peter J K Kuppen; Ines J Goossens-Beumer; Valery E P P Lemmens; Cornelis J H van de Velde; Harm J T Rutten; Hans Morreau; A J C van den Brule
Journal:  Cell Oncol (Dordr)       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 6.730

2.  Cost-effectiveness of High-performance Biomarker Tests vs Fecal Immunochemical Test for Noninvasive Colorectal Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar; S Lucas Goede; Linda J W Bosch; Veerle Melotte; Beatriz Carvalho; Manon van Engeland; Gerrit A Meijer; Harry J de Koning; Marjolein van Ballegooijen
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 11.382

3.  Information provision and patient reported outcomes in patients with metastasized colorectal cancer: results from the PROFILES registry.

Authors:  Olga Husson; Melissa S Y Thong; Floortje Mols; Tineke J Smilde; Geert-Jan Creemers; Lonneke V van de Poll-Franse
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 2.947

4.  Socioeconomic inequalities in relative survival of rectal cancer most obvious in stage III.

Authors:  L I Olsson; F Granstrom
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Pattern of rectal cancer recurrence after curative surgery.

Authors:  Minna Räsänen; Monika Carpelan-Holmström; Harri Mustonen; Laura Renkonen-Sinisalo; Anna Lepistö
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-03-22       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Quantifying fatigue in (long-term) colorectal cancer survivors: a study from the population-based patient reported outcomes following initial treatment and long term evaluation of survivorship registry.

Authors:  Melissa S Y Thong; Floortje Mols; Xin S Wang; Valery E P P Lemmens; Tineke J Smilde; Lonneke V van de Poll-Franse
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 9.162

7.  Trends in colorectal incidence by anatomic subsite from 1985 to 2005: a population-based study.

Authors:  A Caldarella; E Crocetti; L Messerini; E Paci
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 8.  Treatment of colorectal cancer in older patients.

Authors:  Riccardo A Audisio; Demetris Papamichael
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 46.802

Review 9.  Proactive Management for Gastric, Colorectal and Appendiceal Malignancies: Preventing Peritoneal Metastases with Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC).

Authors:  Paolo Sammartino; Daniele Biacchi; Tommaso Cornali; Maurizio Cardi; Fabio Accarpio; Alessio Impagnatiello; Bianca Maria Sollazzo; Angelo Di Giorgio
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-01-26

Review 10.  Neo-adjuvant radiotherapy in rectal cancer.

Authors:  Bengt Glimelius
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-12-14       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.