Literature DB >> 20429456

Evaluation of methyl eugenol and cue-lure traps with solid lure and insecticide dispensers for fruit fly monitoring and male annihilation in the Hawaii Areawide Pest Management Program.

Roger I Vargas1, Ronald F L Mau, John D Stark, Jaime C Piñero, Luc Leblanc, Steven K Souder.   

Abstract

Methyl eugenol (ME) and cue-lure (C-L) traps with solid lure dispensers were deployed in areas with low and high populations of oriental fruit fly, Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel), and melon fly, Bactrocera cucurbitae (Coquillett), respectively. In low-density areas, standard Jackson traps or Hawaii Fruit Fly Areawide Pest Management (AWPM) traps with FT Mallet ME wafers impregnated with dimethyl dichloro-vinyl phosphate (DDVP) or AWPM traps with Scentry ME cones and vapor tape performed equally as well as standard Jackson traps with liquid ME/C-L and naled. Standard Jackson traps or AWPM traps with FT Mallet C-L wafers impregnated with DDVP or AWPM traps with Scentry C-L plugs with vapor tape performed equally as well as standard Jackson traps with a lure-naled solution. In high density areas, captures with traps containing FT Mallet wafers (ME and C-L) outperformed AWPM traps with Scentry cones and plugs (ME and C-L) with DDVP insecticidal strips over a 6-mo period. Captures of B. dorsalis and B. cucurbitae with wafers containing both ME and raspberry ketone (FT Mallet MC) were equivalent to those containing separate lures. From a worker safety and convenience standpoint, FT Mallet ME and C-L wafers with DDVP or Scentry plugs, with or without DDVP vapor tape, are more convenient and safer to handle than standard liquid insecticide formulations used for monitoring and male annihilation programs in Hawaii, and for detections traps used on the U.S. mainland. Furthermore, the FT Mallet MC wafer might be used in a single trap in place of two separate traps for detection of both ME and C-L responding fruit flies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20429456     DOI: 10.1603/ec09299

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Econ Entomol        ISSN: 0022-0493            Impact factor:   2.381


  6 in total

Review 1.  An Overview of Pest Species of Bactrocera Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) and the Integration of Biopesticides with Other Biological Approaches for Their Management with a Focus on the Pacific Region.

Authors:  Roger I Vargas; Jaime C Piñero; Luc Leblanc
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2015-04-03       Impact factor: 2.769

2.  Classical olfactory conditioning in the oriental fruit fly, Bactrocera dorsalis.

Authors:  Jia Li Liu; Xiao Yan Chen; Xin Nian Zeng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  A field test on the effectiveness of male annihilation technique against Bactrocera dorsalis (Diptera: Tephritidae) at varying application densities.

Authors:  Nicholas C Manoukis; Roger I Vargas; Lori Carvalho; Thomas Fezza; Shannon Wilson; Travis Collier; Todd E Shelly
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-08       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  First Record of an Invasive Fruit Fly Belonging to Bactrocera dorsalis Complex (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Europe.

Authors:  Francesco Nugnes; Elia Russo; Gennaro Viggiani; Umberto Bernardo
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 2.769

5.  Dispersal and competitive release affect the management of native and invasive tephritid fruit flies in large and smallholder farms in Ethiopia.

Authors:  Tibebe Dejene Biasazin; Tadiwos W Wondimu; Sebastian Larsson Herrera; Mattias Larsson; Agenor Mafra-Neto; Yitbarek W Gessese; Teun Dekker
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-29       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Male-lure type, lure dosage, and fly age at feeding all influence male mating success in Jarvis' fruit fly.

Authors:  Suk-Ling Wee; Anthony R Clarke
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.