Literature DB >> 20428630

Low compliance with alcohol gel compared with chlorhexidine for hand hygiene in ICU patients: results of an alcohol gel implementation program.

Luis Fernando Aranha Camargo1, Alexandre Rodrigues Marra, Cláudia Vallone Silva, Cláudia Regina Laselva, Denis Faria Moura Junior, Ruy Guilherme G Cal, Maria Aparecida Yamashita, Elias Knobel.   

Abstract

Although the introduction of alcohol based products have increased compliance with hand hygiene in intensive care units (ICU), no comparative studies with other products in the same unit and in the same period have been conducted. We performed a two-month-observational prospective study comparing three units in an adult ICU, according to hand hygiene practices (chlorhexidine alone-unit A, both chlorhexidine and alcohol gel-unit B, and alcohol gel alone-unit C, respectively). Opportunities for hand hygiene were considered according to an institutional guideline. Patients were randomly allocated in the 3 units and data on hand hygiene compliance was collected without the knowledge of the health care staff. TISS score (used for measuring patient complexity) was similar between the three different units. Overall compliance with hand hygiene was 46.7% (659/1410). Compliance was significantly higher after patient care in unit A when compared to units B and C. On the other hand, compliance was significantly higher only between units A (32.1%) and C (23.1%) before patient care (p=0.02). Higher compliance rates were observed for general opportunities for hand hygiene (patient bathing, vital sign controls, etc), while very low compliance rates were observed for opportunities related to skin and gastroenteral care. One of the reasons for not using alcohol gel according to health care workers was the necessity for water contact (35.3%, 12/20). Although the use of alcohol based products is now the standard practice for hand hygiene the abrupt abolition of hand hygiene with traditional products may not be recommended for specific services.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20428630     DOI: 10.1590/S1413-86702009000500003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Braz J Infect Dis        ISSN: 1413-8670            Impact factor:   1.949


  4 in total

1.  Glycerol content within the WHO ethanol-based handrub formulation: balancing tolerability with antimicrobial efficacy.

Authors:  Mayra Gonçalves Menegueti; Ana Maria Laus; Márcia Aparecida Ciol; Maria Auxiliadora-Martins; Anibal Basile-Filho; Elucir Gir; Daniela Pires; Didier Pittet; Fernando Bellissimo-Rodrigues
Journal:  Antimicrob Resist Infect Control       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 4.887

2.  Impact of replacing powdered gloves with powder-free gloves on hand-hygiene compliance among healthcare workers of an intensive care unit: a quasi-experimental study.

Authors:  Mayra Gonçalves Menegueti; Fernando Bellissimo-Rodrigues; Marcia A Ciol; Maria Auxiliadora-Martins; Anibal Basile-Filho; Silvia Rita Marin da Silva Canini; Elucir Gir; Ana Maria Laus
Journal:  Antimicrob Resist Infect Control       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 4.887

3.  Assessment of hand hygiene facilities and staff compliance in a large tertiary health care facility in northern Nigeria: a cross sectional study.

Authors:  Kenneth I Onyedibe; Nathan Y Shehu; Daniela Pires; Samson E Isa; Mark O Okolo; Simji S Gomerep; Comfort Ibrahim; Sunday J Igbanugo; Rachel U Odesanya; Adebola Olayinka; Daniel Z Egah; Didier Pittet
Journal:  Antimicrob Resist Infect Control       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 4.887

4.  Promotion of hand hygiene strengthening initiative in a Nigerian teaching hospital: implication for improved patient safety in low-income health facilities.

Authors:  Chigozie Jesse Uneke; Chinwendu Daniel Ndukwe; Patrick Gold Oyibo; Kingsley Onuoha Nwakpu; Richard Chukwuka Nnabu; Nittita Prasopa-Plaizier
Journal:  Braz J Infect Dis       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 3.257

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.