Involvement of cyclin-dependent kinase-like 2 in cognitive function required for contextual and spatial learning in mice.

Cyclin-dependent kinase-like 2 (Cdkl2) is a cdc2-related serine/threonine protein kinase that is postnatally expressed in various brain regions, including the cerebral cortex, entorhinal cortex, hippocampus, amygdala, and dorsal thalamus. The extremely high Cdkl2 expression in these regions suggests that it has a role in cognition and emotion. Recent genetic studies indicate that mutations of Cdkl family kinases are associated with neurodevelopmental and neuropsychiatric disorders in humans. To elucidate the physiologic role of Cdkl2, we behaviorally analyzed Cdkl2(LacZ/LacZ) mice lacking Cdkl2. Cdkl2(LacZ/LacZ) mice had reduced latencies to enter the dark compartment after electric footshock in an inhibitory avoidance task and attenuated contextual fear responses when exposed to mild training conditions. Hippocampal spatial learning in the Morris water maze was slightly anomalous with mice exhibiting an abnormal swimming pattern. The aversive response in a two-way avoidance task was slightly, but not significantly, enhanced. On the other hand, Cdkl2(LacZ/LacZ) mice did not exhibit altered sensitivity to aversive stimuli, such as electric footshock and heat, or deficits in the elevated plus maze or rotating rod test. These findings suggest that Cdkl2 is involved in cognitive function and provide in vivo evidence for the function of Cdkl family kinases expressed in terminally differentiated neurons in mice.

Introduction

Current understanding of the molecular mechanisms of synaptic plasticity emphasizes the important role of phosphorylation of synaptic substrates, including glutamate receptors (Lee, 2006). Phosphorylation of the transcription factor cAMP responsive element-binding protein mediates signaling from the synapse to the nucleus during hippocampal synaptic plasticity (Deisseroth et al., 1996), which is an important process underlying long-term memory formation in diverse animal species (Silva et al., 1998). Phospho-regulation of key proteins is mediated by various kinases, such as mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II, protein kinase C, cAMP-dependent protein kinase, cGMP-dependent protein kinase, and casein kinase II (Lee, 2006). The heterogeneity of kinases involved in phospho-regulation provides a fundamental basis for the sequential biochemical reactions that underlie the mechanisms of synaptic plasticity.

The cyclin-dependent kinase-like (Cdkl) kinase family comprises five members, Cdkl1 to Cdkl5, and is considered a separate branch of the cyclin-dependent kinase (Cdk) family that is similar to the MAPK family (Taglienti et al., 1996; Malumbres et al., 2009). Although Cdks were originally described as key regulatory elements of the eukaryotic cell cycle (Morgan, 1995), many Cdks are expressed in terminally differentiated cells in the nervous system (Tsai et al., 1993; Grana et al., 1994; Hirose et al., 1997; Lazzaro et al., 1997; LeBouffant et al., 2000) and presumably have roles in processes other than cell-cycle regulation. For example, Cdk5 activity is predominant in the nervous system and has an important role in brain development, neuronal differentiation, neuronal cytoskeletal organization, and regulation of hippocampal synaptic plasticity and learning (Tsai et al., 1993; Ohshima et al., 1996; Hawasli et al., 2007, 2009). Furthermore, activation of the MAPK signaling cascade is involved in long-term facilitation of the sensory to motor synapse in Aplysia and in hippocampal long-term potentiation, water maze learning, and contextual fear conditioning in mammals (Martin et al., 1997; Atkins et al., 1998; Selcher et al., 1999, 2003; Satoh et al., 2007). This evidence suggests that the Cdkl kinase family might be involved in behavioral modification, activity-dependent synaptic plasticity, and learning.

We previously isolated Cdkl2 cDNA from the deep cerebellar nuclei of rabbits undergoing eyeblink conditioning (Gomi et al., 1999). To study the function and transcriptional mechanisms of Cdkl2, we determined the structure of the mouse Cdkl2 gene (Sassa et al., 2000) and prepared Cdkl2 mutant mice (Cdkl2+) in which the amino-terminus-coding exons were replaced by LacZ (Sassa et al., 2004). Analysis of LacZ localization demonstrated strong postnatal expression of Cdkl2 in several brain regions, including the cerebral cortex, entorhinal cortex, hippocampus, amygdala, and dorsal thalamus, as well as the deep cerebellar nuclei (Sassa et al., 2004), suggesting a potential role of Cdkl2 in cognition and emotion. Among the Cdkl family members, the kinase domains of Cdkl1 and Cdkl3 are closely homologous (58–59%) to that of Cdkl2 (Yen et al., 1995; Midmer et al., 1999; Haq et al., 2001). Cdkl1 expression in the brain is observed in astrocytes and is thus complementary to Cdkl2 expression. Cdkl3 transcripts are detected in the brain (Yee et al., 2003; Dubos et al., 2008), but the cell type that expresses Cdkl3 is not yet known. The expression pattern of Cdkl4 in the nervous system is also not yet characterized in detail. Cdkl5 expression is strongly induced in early postnatal stages, and Cdkl5 is present in mature neurons in the adult brain, but not in astrocytes (Rusconi et al., 2008).

Recent studies demonstrated that mutations of Cdkl family members are associated with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) in humans. Dubos et al. (2008) reported that CDKL3, located in chromosome 5, is disrupted in a patient with mild IDD by a balanced reciprocal translocation between chromosome X and 5. Mutations in CDKL5/STK9 are associated with X-linked atypical variants of Rett syndrome, a neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by infantile spasms or early-onset epilepsy with IDD (Kalscheuer et al., 2003; Tao et al., 2004; Weaving et al., 2004). CDKL5 binds and phosphorylates DNA methyltransferase 1 in vitro (Kameshita et al., 2008) and seems to function in a molecular pathway common to that of methyl-CpG-binding protein 2, the main cause of Rett syndrome (Mari et al., 2005). Despite the implications of these findings, direct evidence supporting the role of the Cdkl family members in cognition and emotion is largely missing.

In the present study, we tested homozygous mutant mice (Cdkl2) in a series of behavioral tasks with cognitive, motor, sensory, and emotional elements to assess the role of Cdkl2 in brain physiology.

Materials and Methods

Animals

Cdkl2 mutant mice were generated by deleting a part of the second and third exons and the inter-exonal intron by gene targeting in embryonic stem cells (Sassa et al., 2004). Heterozygous mutant (Cdkl2+) mice were backcrossed to C57BL/6J inbred lines. All mice were maintained at the animal facilities of RIKEN-BSI according to the institutional guidelines. Housing conditions included a 12-h light/dark cycle, with lights on at 8:00 a.m. and ad libitum food and water. Homozygous mutant (Cdkl2) and wild-type (Cdkl2+/+) mice used for behavioral analysis were littermates obtained by intercrossing male and female heterozygotes (F1) or backcrossing heterozygotes (N2 to N6) that had been backcrossed to C57BL/6J mice. Albino animals were not used in the studies to avoid the potential confounding factor of visual impairment. The generations used for behavioral analysis were: F2 and N2–N3 for the open field test, elevated plus-maze, inhibitory avoidance, contextual fear conditioning, nociceptive sensitivity, conditioned taste aversion (CTA), and rotating-rod tests; and N6 for the Morris water maze (MWM) and two-way active avoidance (TAA) tasks. Mice were used for behavioral analysis at the age of 4–6 months. The sex of the mice used and the order of each testing procedure are shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1

The sex of the mice used for behavioral analysis and the testing procedure order are shown. Each frame indicates an independent group of mice used for the analysis. The asterisk indicates that only male mice were analyzed in the step-through inhibitory avoidance task.

Behavioral analysis

Open field

Each mouse was placed in the center of the open field chamber (60W × 60D × 50H cm; OF-3002, O'Hara & Co. Ltd. Tokyo, Japan) and its activity was recorded for 3 min using a monochromatic CCD camera (WAT902B, O'Hara & Co. Ltd., Japan) placed above the chamber. The test was performed in a light condition with 400 lux light illumination. Recorded images were analyzed by the macroprogram NIH Image OF 2.11 (O'Hara & Co. Ltd.) modified software based on the public domain NIH Image program (developed at the US National Institutes of Health and available on the Internet at http://rsb.info.nih.gov/nih-image/). Parameters analyzed were total distance moved (cm), movement rate (cm/min), and movement path. Stereotyped behaviors in the chamber, including number of rearings, grooming episodes, fecal boli, and urination, were counted manually.

Elevated plus-maze

The elevated plus-maze apparatus comprised two arms without walls (open arms; 25W × 8D cm) and two arms with walls (closed arms; 25W × 8D × 15H cm) and an open roof attached to a central platform (8W × 8D cm) in the form of a cross with 90° angles, with the open arms across from each other and the closed arms across from each other (CM-3002, O'Hara & Co. Ltd.). The maze was elevated 50 cm above the floor. Each mouse was placed on the central platform facing an open arm and its behavior was recorded for 5 min using a monochromatic CCD camera (WAT902B) placed above the maze. Recorded images were analyzed by the macroprogram NIH Image EP 2.12 (O'Hara & Co. Ltd.) modified software based on the public domain NIH Image program. Parameters analyzed were total distance moved (cm), total number of arm entries, number of entries into open arms, and the percent time spent on open arms. The observer manually recorded the numbers of rearings in the closed arms, head dipping over the sides of the open arms, grooming episodes, fecal boli, and urination.

Step-through inhibitory avoidance

A step-through type apparatus was used for the inhibitory avoidance test. The apparatus comprised a two-compartment lighted chamber (top dimensions: 12.0L × 9.8W × 9.0H cm, bottom dimensions: 12.0L × 4.2W × 9.0H cm) and dark (18.0L × 13.5W × 11.5H cm) chamber (PA-3002A, O'Hara & Co. Ltd.). A 4-cm diameter hole with a guillotine door partitioned the apparatus into the light and dark chambers. The floor of the chamber was constructed from a stainless steel grid (2-mm diameter bars spaced 6 mm apart). The floor of the dark chamber was connected to a scrambled electric footshock controller (PA-2030A) and an environmental control box (PA-4032). A photo-beam in the dark chamber detected the animal entering from the light chamber and automatically measured the latency (s). After 1-h habituation to the experimental room where the masking noise was applied, each mouse was placed in the lighted chamber facing the dark chamber, and the guillotine door was opened to start an acquisition trial. When the mouse stepped with all four paws into the dark chamber, the guillotine door was closed, the baseline latency was recorded, and a footshock (0.4 mA, 5 s) was administered to the mouse. Five seconds after administering the footshock, the mouse was removed from the chamber and returned to its home cage. The mouse was then again placed in the lighted chamber and the latency to re-enter the dark chamber was measured as a retention trial. Two different animal groups were used for the retention trial. In the first group, step-through latency was measured once 24 h after footshock. In the second group, step-through latency was measured three times, at 1 min, 24 h, and 48 h after footshock. The maximal step-through latency in the retention trial was 180 s. The baseline, acquisition, and retention trial latencies were recorded.

Contextual fear conditioning

Contextual fear conditioning and a freezing test were conducted in a small nonreflective white chamber with a stainless steel grid floor (2-mm diameter bars, spaced 7 mm apart) through which footshocks were delivered (10W × 10D × 10H cm, CL-3002, O'Hara & Co. Ltd.). The chamber was placed inside a soundproof box (61W × 42D × 59H cm, CL-4210) with a ventilation fan providing masking noise, a white fluorescent light (4W) on the sidewall, and a monochromatic CCD camera (WAT902B) placed on the ceiling. The chamber was connected to a scrambled electric shock generator (SGA-2010) controlled by a CL-2010 controller (O'Hara & Co. Ltd.). The CCD camera was connected to a computer and the recorded images were analyzed by a macroprogram NIH Image FZ 2.16 (O'Hara & Co. Ltd.) modified software based on the public domain NIH Image program. The images from the CCD camera were captured as a series of frames (2 frames/s) and saved. An adequate gray scale threshold of the imaged frames was determined to clearly outline the shape of the mouse depending on several parameters; mouse coat color, lighting conditions, and iris setting of the CCD camera. If the lighting and camera conditions were fixed, the main factor relating to the outline of the mouse shape was mouse coat color. We analyzed the black and/or agouti (brown) colored mice for freezing and a gray scale threshold was determined for each coat color. The software calculated the difference in the outline area (pixels) from frame to frame and this difference was used as an index of animal movement or freezing. Freezing behavior was defined as an outline difference between successive frames smaller than 30 pixels that persisted for more than 2 s (i.e., 4 frames). Percent time freezing for each mouse was calculated as the sum of the time spent freezing divided by trial length. Two different protocols were used for contextual fear conditioning, (I) and (II). In protocol (I), the mice were placed into the shock chamber for 4 min and subsequently subjected to five footshock trials (0.7-mA intensity for 1 s with 2 min inter-trial interval [ITI]). Mice were removed from the chamber 2 min after the last footshock and returned to their home cages. Freezing behavior was monitored during the conditioning phase. The next day, the mice were returned the shock chamber and freezing behavior was monitored for 8 min (24-h contextual test). In protocol (II), the mice were subjected to a single footshock (0.35-mA intensity for 3 s) 30 s after being placed into the shock chamber. The mice were removed from the chamber 30 s after the footshock and returned to their home cages. The next day, the mice were returned to the shock chamber and freezing behavior was monitored for 5 min (24-h contextual test).

Nociceptive sensitivity

An electric shock sensitivity test and a hot-plate test were performed as tests of nociceptive sensitivity. Each mouse was placed into the same electric footshock chamber used for the contextual fear conditioning (CL-3002, O'Hara & Co. Ltd.) and given a train of electric shocks (1-s duration) with gradually increasing intensity ranging from 0.1–0.5 mA at 0.05 mA intervals. The intensity of the electric shocks that first evoked three typical responses: flinch, vocalization, and jump, were recorded. For the hot-plate test, each mouse was placed in a plastic cylinder (open ends, 12-cm diameter) on an apparatus maintained at 55°C (FHP-450S, FINE Co. Ltd., Japan). The latency to initiate an avoidance behavior (i.e., lick hindpaw, vigorous hindpaw shaking, or jump) was recorded for a maximum of 60 s.

Morris water maze

Before beginning the MWM task, the mice were handled by the experimenter daily for at least 7 days to reduce the level of stress and acclimate the mouse to the experimenter. The training apparatus was a circular white vinyl chloride pool (100-cm diameter and 30-cm high, WM-3002H, O'Hara & Co. Ltd.). The pool was located 80 cm above the floor. An animal swimming in the pool could see a number of items that remained in a constant location with respect to the pool. The water was maintained at 25°C with a thermo-heater. The goal platform was 10 cm in diameter. The top of the platform was located 0.8 cm below the surface of the water. One of the four starting positions was chosen randomly for each trial. In the hidden-platform test, mice were given 4 trials a day for seven consecutive days. Prior to the first trial on the first day, each mouse was given a pre-training trial to acclimate to the water and the platform by placing the mouse on the platform for 30 s, followed by being placed in the water to swim for 30 s and then climbing onto the platform. After this pre-training, each mouse was placed on the platform for 30 s and then lifted from the platform and placed into the water, facing a pool wall at the start position to start the trials. The escape latency (s) required to locate the platform was recorded for each trial. The mouse was allowed a maximum of 60 s of swimming to find the platform. If the mouse did not find the platform within 60 s, the experimenter guided it to the platform. The mouse remained on the platform for the 30-s ITI. After the last trial on the last training day, the mouse was given a probe trial. During the probe trial, the escape platform was removed from the pool and the mouse was allowed to swim for 60 s. A monochromatic CCD camera (WAT902B) was placed above the pool to record the swimming trials. Recorded images were analyzed by the macroprogram, NIH Image WMH2.10 (O'Hara & Co. Ltd.) modified software based on the public domain NIH Image program. In the training trials, the escape latency and swimming distance were calculated from the image analysis. In the probe trial, the time the mouse spent in each quadrant and the number of times the mouse crossed the exact location where the platform had been during the training trials were determined from image analysis. After the hidden-platform test, the mouse was given a visible-platform test, 4 trials a day for three consecutive days. In the visible-platform test, a platform with a flag was used. The positions of the platform and starting place were randomly varied among four possible places in each trial. The other procedures used in the visible-platform test were the same as described for the hidden-platform test.

Rotating-rod

The apparatus (Ugo Basile Biological Research Apparatus, Italy) used for the rotating-rod test consisted of a gridded plastic roller (3-cm diameter, 5.5-cm long) that was flanked by two round plates (30-cm diameter) to prevent the animals from escaping. The roller was driven at 17 rpm. Each mouse was placed on the rotating rod and the time it remained on the rod was automatically measured. We used two protocols for the test, (I) and (II). In protocol (I), each mouse was trained once per day for five consecutive days. The maximum time allowed on the rotating-rod was 300 s. In protocol (II), mice were given several trials each on 1 day until they could stay on the rod for at least 60 s. The training was performed daily for three consecutive days.

Conditioned taste aversion

For CTA, each mouse was single-housed in a cage (17W × 28D × 12H cm). After 3 days of individual housing, the mice were trained to drink water from two equal water-supplying bottles set within the cage for 8 days (training) prior to conditioning. After training, the mice were deprived of water for 24 h. On day 9 (conditioning day 1), the mice were supplied with two bottles containing 5 mM saccharin sodium solution instead of water for 20 min. Immediately thereafter, the mice were injected intraperitoneally with either 0.15-M lithium chloride (LiCl; 2% of body weight) as a malaise-inducing agent or saline as a control. After treatment, the mice were deprived of water for 24 h and the conditioning was repeated the next day (day 10, conditioning day 2). On day 11 (rest day), the mice were presented with water in the same way as on the training days and their health status was checked. CTA-I was tested on days 12, 13, and 14. In this test, each mouse was presented with two bottles for 24 h, one containing saccharin and the other containing water, and consumption was measured by weighing the bottles before and after the test. The two bottle positions were switched each test day to avoid the effects of a spatial cue bias. On days 15 to 21 (retention days), the mouse was presented with two water bottles. CTA-II was tested on days 22, 23, and 24 as described for the CTA-I. The preference score was defined as (saccharin consumption)/(water plus saccharin consumption) and the score was calculated for both CTA-I and -II. If the mice preferred saccharin over water, the score was greater than 0.5. Data from CTA-I and -II were treated as parameters of middle- and long-term memories, respectively.

Two-way active avoidance

The apparatus for the TAA comprised two identical photo-beam type shuttle boxes (30W × 9D × 15H cm, AA-3202, O'Hara & Co. Ltd.) enclosed in two soundproof chests (61W × 42D × 59H cm, AO-4210), a scrambled electric footshock generator (2CH type, SGA-2020), and a scheduler interface (AA-1020T) controlled by a computer program. The two compartments of the shuttle box were divided with a central inverted U-shaped gate. Photo-beams set in both compartments (9 cm from the central gate) detected animal movement from one chamber to the other. The soundproof chest contained a ventilation fan that also provided a masking sound. The conditioned stimulus (CS) was a tone (600 Hz, 60 dB, 8 s). The unconditioned 0.2-mA footshock stimulus (US) was supplied via the stainless steel floor grid (2-mm diameter bars, spaced 6 mm apart) for 3 s coterminating with the tone. One trial consisted of a 22-s ITI, a CS, and an US. If the mouse crossed the central gate to the opposite compartment and broke the sensor photo-beam within 5 s after the CS onset, the stimulus was terminated and no shock was delivered (avoidance response; AR). A crossing response that occurred during the shock terminated both the tone and shock (escape response; ER). If the mouse failed to cross during the entire tone-shock trial, the tone and shock were terminated after 8 s. A crossing response during the ITI was recorded as a non-effective response. Each mouse was given 30 trials per day for three consecutive days. The percentage of AR and average AR latency (s) was analyzed.

Histologic analysis

Adult mice (2- to 3-months old) were deeply anesthetized by intraperitoneal injection of sodium pentobarbital (0.1 mg/g body weight). For paraffin sections, mice were first intracardially perfused with 10 ml of saline and then with 100 ml of fixative [4% paraformaldehyde in 0.1-M phosphate buffer (pH 7.3)] at 4°C. Brain tissues were dissected into small blocks (5-mm thick) and postfixed in the same fixative overnight. Tissue blocks were dehydrated and embedded in paraffin. Coronal sections (3- to 4-μm thick) were stained with hematoxylin-eosin (H-E) or processed for immunohistochemistry. Deparaffinized sections were autoclaved in Milli-Q water at 121°C for 5 min. Immunohistochemistry was performed with the avidin-biotin-peroxidase technique using the Vectastain Elite-ABC kit (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA). Mouse monoclonal anti-neurofilament 2H3 antibody (1:100 hybridoma supernatant; Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank, Iowa City, IA, USA) and anti-calbindin D antibody (1:100; C-8666, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) were used for immunohistochemistry. Stained sections were viewed with a microscope (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany). For LacZ expression analysis, horizontal and coronal brain slices (100- to 300-μm thick) were prepared using a microslicer DTK-1000 (Dosaka EM, Kyoto, Japan). Detailed procedures of slice preparation and staining were described previously (Sassa et al., 2004).

Statistical analysis

Values in tables and graphs are expressed as means ± SEM. Statistical analysis was conducted using StatView J-4.5 (Abacus Concepts, Piscataway, NJ, USA). Data were analyzed by an analysis of variance (ANOVA), unpaired Student's t-test, Chi-square test, or Mann-Whitney U-test. The Mann-Whitney U-test was used when the distribution of the samples was not normally distributed. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.

Results

Prior to the behavioral analyses, we extensively examined the brain structures of the Cdkl2 mice. Gross brain anatomy, assessed by H-E staining, of Cdkl2 mice did not differ from that of Cdkl2+/+ mice. Immunohistochemistry using anti-neurofilament and anti-calbindin-D antibodies revealed no obvious morphologic abnormalities of the axons and dendrites from neurons in the cerebral cortex, hippocampus, amygdala, or cerebellum of Cdkl2 mice (Figure 2).

Figure 2

Morphologic analysis. H-E-staining (HE) and immunohistochemistry for neurofilament (NF) and calbindin-D (CB) in coronal brain sections of Cdkl2+/+ and Cdkl2 mice. Scale bar: 500 μm.

We then analyzed Cdkl2 expression in the brain of Cdkl2 mice. As previously reported in Cdkl2+ mice (Sassa et al., 2004), the LacZ-reporter was expressed in neurons in various brain regions, including the olfactory bulb, caudate-putamen, cerebral cortex, hippocampus, thalamic nuclei, amygdaloid nuclei, entorhinal cortex, and deep cerebellar nuclei (Figure 3). LacZ expression was strongest in layers II-III and V-VI of the cerebral cortex and entorhinal cortex, stronger in the hippocampus and thalamic nuclei, and moderate in the caudate-putamen, amygdala, and deep cerebellar nuclei.

Figure 3

. (A) Horizontal (300-μm thick) and (B) coronal brain slices (100-μm thick) were prepared using a microslicer and stained with X-gal solution for 6 h at 37°C. Abbreviations: Cp, caudate-putamen; Ec, entorhinal cortex; Dcn, deep cerebellar nuclei; Sc, somatosensory cortex; Hp, hippocampus; Th, thalamic nuclei; Am, amygdala. Scale bar: 2 mm.

To evaluate locomotor and exploratory activities in Cdkl2 mice, we performed an open field test. Mice were placed in the center of the open field chamber for 3 min. Distance moved in the chamber and time spent in each region of the chamber were measured and stereotyped behaviors were counted (Table 1). Distance moved in the chamber did not differ significantly between genotypes. The time-spent pattern in each region showed that both genotypes equally avoided the center zone of the open field. Although male Cdkl2 mice tended to have an increased number of rearings (P = 0.0607), the difference between genotypes was not significant. The number of rearings, grooming episodes, fecal boli, and urinations did not significantly differ between genotypes.

Table 1

Measurement of animal behavior in open field and elevated plus-maze.

Genotype	Cdkl2+/+	Cdkl2LacZ/LacZ	P	Cdkl2+/+	Cdkl2LacZ/LacZ	P
Sex	Males			Females
Number of animals	29	23		15	15
OPEN FIELD
Distance moved (cm)
1st 1 min	330 ± 24	359 ± 33		380 ± 57	322 ± 52
2nd 1 min	378 ± 34	409 ± 36		385 ± 42	374 ± 48
3rd 1 min	355 ± 34	399 ± 36		300 ± 35	383 ± 49
Total 3 min	1062 ± 81	1167 ± 89		1065 ± 109	1078 ± 111
Time spent (s)
Corner	109 ± 5	103 ± 6		102 ± 7	89 ± 7
Side	51 ± 3	55 ± 4		53 ± 6	65 ± 6
Center	20 ± 5	21 ± 4		26 ± 5	26 ± 9
Rearing	9.21 ± 1.21	13.26 ± 1.8	0.0607	nc	nc
Grooming	0.75 ± 0.08	0.57 ± 0.11		nc	nc
Feces	0.79 ± 0.27	0.78 ± 0.27		nc	nc
Urination	0.18 ± 0.74	0.17 ± 0.81		nc	nc
ELEVATED PLUS-MAZE
Open arm entry (no.)	5.6 ± 0.8	7.0 ± 0.6		4.6 ± 0.9	6.8 ± 1.0
Total entry (no.)	10.9 ± 1.2	12.8 ± 1.0		10.7 ± 1.4	14.5 ± 2.0
Open arm time (%)	47.5 ± 4.3	53.2 ± 3.4		45.8 ± 6.9	46.4 ± 3.6
Distance moved (cm)	523 ± 44	611 ± 38		503 ± 40	622 ± 55	0.0972
Rearing	4.79 ± 0.94	6.87 ± 1.11		2.86 ± 0.77	4.22 ± 1.11
Head-dipping	13.55 ± 1.57	12.91 ± 1.34		6.71 ± 1.32	10.11 ± 2.19
Feces	1.00 ± 0.11	1.13 ± 0.11		3.18 ± 0.62	1.83 ± 0.66
Urination	0.10 ± 0.06	0.13 ± 0.07		0.36 ± 0.19	0.41 ± 0.29

Blank space in P-value columns indicates P > 0.1 (unpaired Student's t-test). Data are presented as mean ± SEM; nc, not counted.

Anxiety-related behavior was then evaluated in an elevated plus-maze (Lister, 1987). Mice were placed in the center of elevated plus-maze for 5 min, and the number of entries into the arms, time spent in each compartment, and distance moved were measured (Table 1). Both genotypes tended to avoid the open arms, as assessed by counting the number of open arm entries and time spent on open arms. Although female Cdkl2 mice tended to move a greater total distance (P = 0.0972), the difference between genotypes was not significant. The stereotyped behaviors, including rearings on the closed arms, head dipping on open arms, fecal boli, and urinations, did not differ significantly between genotypes. These results suggest that the affective state of the Cdkl2 mice is not appreciably altered.

To evaluate context-dependent avoidance activity, we performed a step-through inhibitory avoidance test (Lorenzini et al., 1996). We measured the retention latencies in two independent experiments. In the first experiment, the retention latency to enter the dark chamber was measured 24 h after footshock in Cdkl2+/+ mice (n = 16) and Cdkl2 mice (n = 14). The baseline latency to enter the dark chamber was not different between the two genotypes. Although the retention latency of Cdkl2 mice tended to decrease in the 24-h retention test, the difference between Cdkl2+/+ and Cdkl2 mice was not significant (Figure 4A, P = 0.0745). The percentage of Cdkl2 mice that did not enter the dark compartment (non-step-through) also tended to decrease (Figure 4B, P = 0.0708). On the other hand, in the second experiment, the retention latency to enter the dark chamber was measured three times (1 min, 24 h, and 48 h) after footshock in Cdkl2+/+ mice (n = 29) and Cdkl2 mice (n = 23). The baseline latency to enter the dark chamber was not different between the two genotypes. The retention latencies measured at 1 min, 24 h, and 48 h after footshock in Cdkl2 mice were significantly shorter than those of Cdkl2+/+ mice (Figure 4C). The percentages of non-step-through in Cdkl2 mice were also significantly lower than those of Cdkl2+/+ mice in the 1-min and 24-h retention tests (Figure 4D). The values of both parameters, however, increased over time in Cdkl2 mice. The percentage of non-step-through was significantly increased in the 48-h retention test compared to the 1-min retention test (P = 0.0104).

Figure 4

Inhibitory avoidance test. When the animals had stepped with all four paws into the dark compartment, the door was closed and the baseline latency was recorded. The animals were given a single footshock (0.4 mA for 5 s) and then placed in their home cages. Retention was tested by placing the mice in the lighted compartment and measuring the latency to enter the dark compartment. (A) Step-through latencies to enter the dark compartment were measured 24 h after footshock. Statistical analysis was performed using the Mann-Whitney U-test. The baseline latencies were not significantly different between genotypes (U = 102.5, P = 0.6926). In the 24-h retention trials, Cdkl2 mice exhibited reduced latencies, but the difference was not significant (U = 74.0, P = 0.0745). (B) The percentage of mice that did not enter the dark compartment (non-step-through) in 24-h retention trials was plotted. A chi-square test revealed that there was no significant difference in percent non-step-through between Cdkl2+/+mice and Cdkl2 mice (χ2 = 3.214, P = 0.0730). (C) Step-through latencies were measured 1 min, 24 h, and 48 h after footshock. The baseline latencies were not significantly different between genotypes (U = 258.5, P = 0.1670). In the retention trials, Cdkl2 mice exhibited significantly reduced latencies at 1 min and 24 h after footshock (1 min, U = 181.5, P = 0.0051, 24 h, U = 163.5, P = 0.0017 and 48 h, U = 218.5, P = 0.0341). (D) The percentage of non-step-through Cdkl2 mice was significantly different between 1 min and 24 h (1 min, χ2 = 11.258, P = 0.0008 and 24 h, χ2 = 12.554, P = 0.0004). In Cdkl2 mice, the percentage of non-step-through was significantly higher in the 48-h retention test compared to the 1-min retention test (χ2 = 6.571, P = 0.0104).

We examined contextual fear conditioning to evaluate context-dependent learning in Cdkl2 mice. We used two different protocols with strong and weak conditioning stimuli. In protocol (I), female mice were given five repeated footshocks 4 min after placement into the shock chamber. Thus, a strong CS and US were used. Pre-shock baseline freezing was not significantly different between Cdkl2+/+ (n = 15) and Cdkl2 (n = 15) mice (Figure 5A). During the 2-min interval after footshock, both Cdkl2+/+ and Cdkl2 mice exhibited significant increases in freezing behavior as the conditioning procedure progressed (approximately 85% freezing after the 5th shock). Twenty-four hours later, the mice were returned to the shock chamber and freezing behavior was measured (24-h contextual test). While the level of the overall freezing behavior in Cdkl2 mice was similar (approximately 80%) to that in Cdkl2+/+ mice, freezing behavior was significantly reduced in Cdkl2 mice during the initial 3 min of testing (Figure 5B, P = 0.0385). In protocol (II), in which the training protocol was milder than that of protocol (I), male Cdkl2+/+ (n = 21) and Cdkl2 (n = 19) mice were given a single footshock 30 s after being placed into the chamber. The freezing behavior of Cdkl2 mice in the 24-h contextual test was significantly decreased compared to that of Cdkl2+/+ mice (Figure 5C, P = 0.0022). The pre-shock baseline freezing, however, was significantly different between in Cdkl2+/+ and Cdkl2 mice (P = 0.0119). Because these mice had previously undergone inhibitory avoidance testing, the deficit in Cdkl2 mice observed in the 24-h contextual test was likely due to both generalization from the inhibitory avoidance task and new learning.

Figure 5

Contextual fear conditioning. Freezing responses were evaluated in two different protocols, (I) and (II). (A) In protocol (I), five footshocks (0.7 mA for 1 s, 2 min apart) were given at 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 min after the animals were placed in the chamber. Pre-shock baseline freezing (4 min) was not significantly different between Cdkl2+/+ and Cdkl2 mice. During conditioning, the percent time spent freezing was determined. Arrowheads indicate when the footshock was administered. (B) In the 24-h contextual test, percent time spent freezing was determined for 8 min. Repeated measures ANOVA revealed no significant main effect of genotype on conditioning (F(1,28) = 0.034, P = 0.8559) or in the 24-h contextual test (F(1,28) = 2.295, P = 0.1410), and there was no significant interaction between genotype and time of conditioning (F(4,112) = 1.626, P = 0.1727) or in the 24-h contextual test (F(7,196) = 1.210, P = 0.2991). There was a significant difference between Cdkl2+/+ and Cdkl2 mice in the mean values in minutes 1, 2, and 3 of the 24-h contextual test (F(1,28) = 4.718, P = 0.0385). (C) In protocol (II), a single footshock (0.35 mA for 3 s) was given a 30 s after the animals were placed in the chamber. Pre-shock baseline freezing (30 s) was significantly decreased in Cdkl2 mice (t(38) = −2.642, P = 0.0119, unpaired Student's t-test), but post-shock freezing (30 s) was not significantly different (t(38) = −1.868, P = 0.0694). Percentage of time spent freezing on the 24-h contextual test was measured for 5 min immediately after the animals were returned to the footshock chamber. Repeated measures ANOVA revealed a significant main effect of genotype (F(1,38) = 10.743, P = 0.0022) but the interaction between genotype and time was not significant (F(4,152) = 0.003, P > 0.9999).

To evaluate nociceptive sensitivity, we measured nociceptive threshold for electric shock and heat stimuli (Table 2). First, we determined the minimum current (mA) required to elicit three typical reactions of mice to footshock, flinch, vocalization, and jump (Kim et al., 1991). Cdkl2 mice did not differ from Cdkl2+/+ mice in their responses to footshock for any of these three responses. We then measured the reaction latency (s) of mice to display avoidance behavior (i.e., lick hindpaw, vigorous hindpaw shaking, or jump) on the hot-plate at 55°C. Cdkl2 and Cdkl2+/+ mice exhibited comparable sensitivity to heat stimulus. Thus, nociceptive sensitivity in Cdkl2 mice was equivalent to that in Cdkl2+/+ mice.

Table 2

Measurement of nociceptive responses.

Genotype	Cdkl2+/+	Cdkl2LacZ/LacZ	Cdkl2+/+	Cdkl2LacZ/LacZ
Sex	Males		Females
Number of animals	29	23	15	15
Footshock (mA)
Flinch	0.10	0.10	0.10	0.11
Vocalization	0.18	0.20	0.16	0.17
Jump	0.37	0.36	0.38	0.40
Hot-plate (s)	22.4	19.8	31.9	31.8

Data are expressed as the mean value.

We investigated whether Cdkl2 mice exhibit altered hippocampal-dependent learning in the MWM (Morris et al., 1982). Cdkl2+/+ (n = 14) and Cdkl2 (n = 15) mice were trained for 7 days in the hidden platform test with 4 trials per day. During the training period, both Cdkl2+/+ and Cdkl2 mice exhibited improved performance in finding the hidden platform (Figure 6A). Escape latency (s) and swimming distance (cm) did not differ significantly between genotypes, but the Cdkl2 mice swam significantly slower than the Cdkl2+/+ mice during the training trials. In the probe test, both Cdkl2+/+ and Cdkl2 mice performed selective searching in the target quadrant with equal percentage of time swimming, but Cdkl2 mice exhibited significantly fewer crossings of the platform location compared to Cdkl2+/+ mice (Figure 6B). Furthermore, Cdkl2 mice spent a significantly higher percentage of time swimming along the pool-wall and swam slower. In the visible platform test, the Cdkl2 mice consistently swam slower than the Cdkl2+/+ mice, but there was no effect of genotype on locating the visible platform (Figure 6C).

Figure 6

Morris water maze (MWM). (A) The escape latency (left) and swimming velocity (right) in each session of the hidden-platform test. There was a significant main effect in escape latency among trial sessions based on repeated measures ANOVA (F(6,162) = 20.731, P < 0.001), but the main effect between genotypes was not significant (F(1,27) = 2.465, P = 0.1281). There was a significant main effect between genotypes in the swimming velocity (F(1,27) = 7.351, P = 0.0115). (B) Swimming profiles in the probe test. The percent quadrant search time (left), number of crossings over the platform position in the target quadrant (middle), percent time swimming along the pool-wall, and swimming velocity (right) were analyzed. Cdkl2 mice crossed the platform position significantly less often than Cdkl2+/+ mice. Significant main effects were detected among quadrants by ANOVA (F(3,81) = 8.462, P < 0.0001) and between genotypes (F(1,27) = 4.197, P = 0.0500). Significant differences in the percentage of the time swimming along the pool wall (t(27) = 3.379, P = 0.0022) and swimming velocity (t(27) = −3.068, P = 0.0049) were detected between genotypes by unpaired Student's t-test. (C) The escape latency (left) and swimming velocity (right) in each session of the visible-platform test. A significant main effect among trial sessions was detected by repeated measures ANOVA (F(2,54) = 31.254, P < 0.0001), but there was no main effect between genotypes (F(1,27) = 1.217, P = 0.2797). A significant main effect between genotypes was detected in the swimming velocity (F(1,27) = 4.607, P = 0.0410).

Although the Cdkl2 mice swam slower during the MWM, no apparent motor deficit in rotating-rod test was observed in Cdkl2 mice (Figure 7). We used two experimental protocols in the rotating-rod test (Shibuki et al., 1996). In protocol (I), male mice were trained once per day for five consecutive days on the rotating-rod with an upper limit of 300-s. Retention time (s) on the rod of Cdkl2+/+ (n = 15) and Cdkl2 (n = 15) mice is shown in Figure 7A. Most mice of both genotypes learned to stay on the rod by the fifth session and there was no significant difference between genotypes. In protocol (II), female mice were given multiple training trials in a single day for three consecutive days until they could stay on the rotating-rod for more than 60 s and the number of trials required was counted for three consecutive days (Figure 7B). Both Cdkl2+/+ (n = 15) and Cdkl2 (n = 14) mice learned the task and there was no significant difference between genotypes. Body weight of the animals examined for the rotating rod test was not significantly different between genotypes (Cdkl2+/+ mice: male, 26.9 ± 3.0 g and female, 21.3 ± 2.7 g vs. Cdkl2 mice: male, 27.8 ± 3.9 g and female, 19.5 ± 2.4 g). Thus, Cdkl2 mice did not show any apparent deficit in motor coordination in a constant-speed rotating rod task.

Figure 7

Rotating-rod test. (A) Mice were trained once a day for five consecutive days. Maximal time allowed on the rotating-rod was 300 s. (B) Mice were repeatedly trained for 1 day until they stayed on the rod longer than 60 s. The training was performed for three consecutive days. There were no significant differences between Cdkl2+/+ and Cdkl2 mice in either type of test (Mann-Whitney U-test).

We then evaluated the behavior of Cdkl2 mice in an amygdala-dependent task, CTA (Nachman and Ashe, 1974; Yamamoto and Fujimoto, 1991; Yamamoto et al., 1994). In CTA, animals learn to associate a taste CS and visceral malaise-inducing US. A strong aversive response can be elicited in mice by paired administration of saccharin flavor and a malaise-inducing intraperitoneal injection of LiCl. Because there is no apparent sex difference in the acquisition of CTA in experimental rodents (Dalla and Shors, 2009; Pistell et al., 2008), we evaluated CTA with data from male and female animals. There were no differences in the basal level of water or saccharin consumption before CTA between Cdkl2+/+ and Cdkl2 mice; water consumption in a day during training days, Cdkl2+/+ males; 5.19 ± 0.50 ml vs. Cdkl2 males; 5.09 ± 0.34 ml, Cdkl2+/+ females; 4.72 ± 0.39 ml vs. Cdkl2 females; 4.96 ± 0.48 ml, saccharin consumption for 20 min on conditioning day, Cdkl2+/+ males; 1.03 ± 0.11 ml vs. Cdkl2 males; 1.22 ± 0.07 ml, Cdkl2+/+ females; 0.88 ± 0.06 ml vs. Cdkl2 females; 0.92 ± 0.08 ml, and water consumption for 24 h on resting day, Cdkl2+/+ males; 5.96 ± 0.35 ml vs. Cdkl2 males; 4.94 ± 0.52 ml, Cdkl2+/+ females; 4.92 ± 0.32 ml vs. Cdkl2 females; 4.99 ± 0.64 ml). CTA was evaluated twice to examine middle-term and long-term memory. CTA-I testing (middle-term memory) was performed 1 day after conditioning and lasted for three consecutive days. CTA-II (long-term memory) was performed 8 days after CTA I for three consecutive days. In CTA-I, both Cdkl2 (n = 10) and Cdkl2+/+ (n = 10) mice injected with LiCl exhibited a significant aversive response to saccharin (preference score < 0.5) compared with Cdkl2 (n = 8) and Cdkl2+/+ (n = 10) mice injected with saline (Figure 8). In CTA-II, the aversive response to saccharin tended to be lower than that of CTA-I in both Cdkl2 and Cdkl2+/+ mice injected with LiCl. There were no significant differences between genotypes in either CTA-I or CTA-II.

Figure 8

Conditioned taste aversion (CTA). The data are expressed as relative ratios of the saccharin consumption/water and saccharin consumption (preference score) for each mouse using the two-bottle choice procedure. Preference score is the mean of three consecutive days of measurements. Cdkl2+/+ and Cdkl2 mice significantly learned equally well to avoid saccharin following saccharin-lithium chloride paired conditioning in both CTA-I and -II (P < 0.0015, Mann-Whitney U-test). The data were collected from Cdkl2+/+ (four males and six females) and Cdkl2 (three males and five females) mice injected with saline, and from Cdkl2+/+ (four males and six females) and Cdkl2 (five males and five females) mice injected with LiCl.

We further attempted to evaluate whether the altered avoidance behavior of Cdkl2 mice observed in the inhibitory avoidance task was accompanied by a change in active avoidance behavior. We used the TAA task with a shuttle box (Archer et al., 1982). The TAA task is considered to measure nondeclarative memory and relies on both classical fear conditioning and instrumental aversive conditioning (Squire, 1992). In this task, the animal has to learn the association between an aversive US and a CS, and learning acquisition is impaired in animals with amygdala lesions or pharmacologic inactivation of amygdala function (Roozendaal et al., 1993; Savonenko et al., 2003; Segura-Torres et al., 2010). The % ARs in first 10 trials of the first day in Cdkl2+/+ mice (n = 14) and Cdkl2 mice (n = 14) was higher (22∼30%) than that in second 10 trials (9∼11%), presumably due to the fact that the mice were not yet familiar with the shuttle box task and moved randomly in the box (Figure 9A). During the progression of trials, Cdkl2 mice exhibited similar % ARs to that of Cdkl2+/+ mice. Although there was no significant difference in % ARs between genotypes, Cdkl2 mice tended to display higher % ARs during the trials. The differences in AR latency (Figure 9B), crossing responses during the shock (% ERs), and the ITI (% non-effective response) were not significantly different between genotypes.

Figure 9

Two-way active avoidance (TAA). (A) Percent avoidance response (% ARs) over 3 days (30 trials/day) is plotted. Repeated measures ANOVA revealed no signifi cant main effect of genotype (F(1, 26) = 1.176, P = 0.2881) and no significant interaction between genotype and day (F(8, 208) = 0.292, P = 0.9680). (B) AR latency by trial days. Unpaired Student's t-test revealed no significant differences between Cdkl2+/+ and Cdkl2 mice.

Discussion

The physiologic role of Cdkl2 in the adult brain has not yet been elucidated. In the present study, we generated Cdkl2 mice to investigate the role of Cdkl2 in brain function. Cdkl2 mice were viable and fertile, and exhibited no gross abnormalities in brain anatomy and general behaviors. Analysis of LacZ localization in adult brain of Cdkl2 mice demonstrated that the strongest expression of Cdkl2 was in the cerebral cortex, entorhinal cortex, and hippocampus, suggesting that Cdkl2 has a potential role in higher brain function. When we analyzed Cdkl2 mice using several behavioral tests, the mutant mice exhibited behavioral abnormalities related to cognitive function in contextual and spatial learning acquisition. Normal nociceptive responses and motor coordination in Cdkl2 mice indicated that these behavioral abnormalities were not caused by sensorimotor deficits. Further, activities in locomotion, exploration, and anxiety-related behavior were not significantly changed in Cdkl2 mice. Here we discuss the behavioral abnormalities in Cdkl2 mice and a potential role of Cdkl2 in brain function.

In the inhibitory avoidance task, Cdkl2 mice had reduced latencies to enter the dark chamber in the retention tests. The percentages of mice that did not enter the dark compartment was also lower in Cdkl2 mice. Although the reduced latency in Cdkl2 mice measured in a single 24-h retention test was not significantly different compared to that in Cdkl2+/+ mice, strong and significant avoidance activities were observed when Cdkl2 mice were tested with a shorter retention time (1 min) after footshock. The avoidance activities persisted for up to the 48-h retention test, but gradually weakened over time. These results suggest that Cdkl2 plays a role in consolidation of fear memory. Studies of brain lesions and pharmacologic inactivation support the notion that an initial memory is formed in the amygdala and is necessary for subsequent storage elsewhere in the learning of inhibitory avoidance (Liang et al., 1982, 1994; Kim and McGaugh, 1992; Parent et al., 1992). In addition to the amygdala, the hippocampus and other regions, such as the entorhinal cortex, parietal cortex, and medial septal area, are involved in this task, suggesting that the sequential and anatomic connectivity of the neural circuit is important in this type of learning (Izquierdo et al., 1992, 1997; Ambrogi Lorenzini et al., 1996, 1997, 1999). Thus, impaired inhibitory avoidance in Cdkl2 mice may be due to dysfunction of the linking pathways, including those between the amygdala, hippocampus, entorhinal cortex, and cerebral cortex.

We used two protocols for the contextual fear conditioning, with either strong or mild conditioning stimuli. Cdkl2 mice displayed a significant but subtle impairment in freezing response 24 h after repeated presentation of the US with a longer CS duration (Figure 5B). Interestingly, if mice that were pre-exposed to the inhibitory avoidance test (Figures 4C,D) were given a short CS and single US pair, they exhibited a more significant decrease in 24-h context-dependent freezing (Figure 5C). In the later case, Cdkl2 mice had a lower freezing baseline in the pre-shock period. Nevertheless, the results of contextual fear conditioning suggest that Cdkl2 mice had impaired freezing behavior accompanied by a mild learning deficit and the degree of disability seems to be dependent on the stimulus threshold for conditioning and/or prior experience. Several lines of evidence suggest that the amygdala and hippocampus constitute major substrates of the neural circuit required for contextual fear conditioning (Selden et al., 1991; Kim and Fanselow, 1992; Phillips and LeDoux, 1992; Kim et al., 1993; Maren and Fanselow, 1997; Anagnostaras et al., 1999). Although context-dependent fear conditioning is widely accepted as a hippocampus-dependent learning task, a recent review points out that there is no absolute requirement for the hippocampus in fear conditioning to context and that nonassociative factors may influence fear response behavior (Maren, 2008). Therefore, it is difficult to declare which neural structure is critically related to the deficit in contextual fear conditioning in Cdkl2 mice. Our data, however, suggest that Cdkl2 mice are likely to have impaired hippocampal function rather than impaired amygdaloid function. The fact that the Cdkl2 mice were not impaired in CTA, an amygdala-dependent learning task, is consistent with this idea. In CTA, Cdkl2 mice learned to associate a saccharin taste and visceral malaise induced by LiCl. In the retention of aversive memory, Cdkl2 mice showed a similar term-dependency to that of Cdkl2+/+ mice. Consistently, there was no significant difference in the TAA task between genotypes. Early and recent studies demonstrate that acquisition of TAA is impaired in animals with amygdala lesions and pharmacologic inactivation of NMDA receptors in the amygdala (Roozendaal et al., 1993; Savonenko et al., 2003; Segura-Torres et al., 2010). In Cdkl2 mice, the aversive response in TAA was slightly, but not significantly, enhanced. Regarding the enhanced aversive response in Cdkl2 mice, it is notable that lesions of the hippocampus and related structures such as the fimbria-fornix and tuberomammilary nucleus improve or facilitate the acquisition of TAA (Gray and McNaughton, 1983; Segura-Torres et al., 1996; Weiner et al., 1998; Guillazo-Blanch et al., 2002). Therefore, the overall pattern of behavioral abnormalities of Cdkl2 mice in context-dependent behavioral paradigms suggests that the contribution of amygdala impairment is not as large as that of impairment of the hippocampus and hippocampal-related regions.

In the MWM, we observed a curious behavioral feature in Cdkl2 mice. Cdkl2 mice had slightly impaired spatial learning as well as some deficits in emotion, motivation, and swimming activity. While Cdkl2 mice exhibited a significant decrease in the escape latency required to find the platform location in the hidden-platform version and increased time spent in the trained quadrant in the probe test, they exhibited significantly fewer platform crossings in the probe test. In the MWM task, increased time spent in the trained quadrant and crossing frequency of platform position in the probe test as well as decreased escape latency in the hidden-platform version are considered to be indicators of spatial memory (Morris et al., 1982; Silva et al., 1992). Therefore, it is unlikely that Cdkl2 mice have severely impaired spatial memory per se, but they presumably have a deficit in fine-tuning of the precise location of the platform. Cdkl2 mice spent a higher percentage of time swimming along the pool-wall with a slower swimming velocity, despite their normal motor and visual function. This phenotypic feature in Cdkl2 mice is probably due to an alteration in cognitive function. For example, while Cdkl2+/+ mice develop a strategy for finding the platform by swimming quickly but stopping periodically to reassess their strategy, Cdkl2 mice utilize a strategy in which they swim slowly but continuously. The ability to conduct sustained action or decision-making based on cognitive assessment of the current situation might be impaired in Cdkl2 mice. In relation to this point, subtle changes in other behaviors of Cdkl2 mice should not be overlooked. Cdkl2 mice displayed a high avoidance tendency in TAA, high frequency of rearings in the open field, and increased total distance traveled in the elevated plus-maze. Therefore, we cannot rule out the possibility that a slight emotional impairment produces the behavioral phenotype of Cdkl2 mice in the MWM. Further electrophysiologic study using hippocampal slices will help to evaluate the hippocampal function and explain the behavioral abnormalities of Cdkl2 mice with respect to synaptic plasticity.

Although the function of Cdkl kinases in vivo is unclear, recent discoveries that mutations of human CDKL3 (Dubos et al., 2008) and CDKL5 can cause mild IDD and X-linked Rett syndrome (Kalscheuer et al., 2003; Tao et al., 2004; Weaving et al., 2004), respectively, suggest possible roles of the Cdkl family in neurodevelopmental or neuropsychiatric function. At least 10 mutations in CDKL5 have been identified in girls with an atypical form of Rett syndrome known as the early-onset seizure variant (Nemos et al., 2009). This severe form of the disorder includes many of the features of classic Rett syndrome (caused by gene mutation of methyl-CpG-binding protein 2), including developmental disability, loss of language skills, and repeated hand wringing or hand washing movements as well as recurrent seizures. Children with this condition also have profound intellectual disability. Inactivation of human CDKL3 caused by a balanced reciprocal translocation between chromosome X and 5 [46,X,t(X;5)(p11.1;q31.1)] is associated with nonspecific mild IDD (Dubos et al., 2008). The expression of Cdkl5 in mice is strongly induced in early postnatal stages, and in the adult brain Cdkl5 is present in mature neurons, but not in astrocytes (Rusconi et al., 2008). The carboxy-terminal tail regulates the subcellular localization of Cdkl5, which undergoes nucleocytoplasmic shuttling. A similar developmental expression pattern in the brain and subcellular localization in neurons are observed for Cdkl2. Thus, some overlapping or similar potential relevance of these molecules might be involved in their functions.

In summary, Cdkl2 appears to be involved in normal behavioral control relating to the cognitive function required to acquire contextual and spatial learning in mice. Our results provide new insight into the in vivo function of neuronal Cdkl kinases in mice. Searching for the biochemical substrates and interacting proteins of Cdkl2 and development of a circuit-specific conditional knockout mice will contribute to elucidating the detailed molecular mechanisms of Cdkl2 function and the critical neural circuit involving by Cdkl2 in learning.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.