PROBLEM: Antiretroviral therapy (ART) programmes have been successful in several countries. However, whether they would succeed as part of a national programme in a resource-constrained setting such as India is not clear. The outcomes and specific problems encountered in such a setting have not been adequately studied. APPROACH: We assessed the efficacy and functioning of India's national ART programme in a tertiary care centre in northern India. All ART-naive patients started on ART between May 2005 and October 2006 were included in the study and were followed until 31 April 2008. Periodic clinical and laboratory evaluations were carried out in accordance with national guidelines. Changes in CD4+ lymphocyte count, body weight and body mass index were assessed at follow-up, and the operational problems analysed. LOCAL SETTING: The setting was a tertiary care centre in northern India with a mixed population of patients, mostly of low socioeconomic status. The centre is reasonably well resourced but faces constraints in health-care delivery, such as lack of adequate human resources and a high patient load. RELEVANT CHANGES: The response to ART in the cohort studied was comparable to that reported from other countries. However, the programme had a high attrition rate, possibly due to patient-related factors and operational constraints. LESSONS LEARNT: A high rate of attrition can affect the overall efficacy and functioning of an ART programme. Addressing the issues causing attrition might improve patient outcomes in India and in other resource-constrained countries.
PROBLEM: Antiretroviral therapy (ART) programmes have been successful in several countries. However, whether they would succeed as part of a national programme in a resource-constrained setting such as India is not clear. The outcomes and specific problems encountered in such a setting have not been adequately studied. APPROACH: We assessed the efficacy and functioning of India's national ART programme in a tertiary care centre in northern India. All ART-naive patients started on ART between May 2005 and October 2006 were included in the study and were followed until 31 April 2008. Periodic clinical and laboratory evaluations were carried out in accordance with national guidelines. Changes in CD4+ lymphocyte count, body weight and body mass index were assessed at follow-up, and the operational problems analysed. LOCAL SETTING: The setting was a tertiary care centre in northern India with a mixed population of patients, mostly of low socioeconomic status. The centre is reasonably well resourced but faces constraints in health-care delivery, such as lack of adequate human resources and a high patient load. RELEVANT CHANGES: The response to ART in the cohort studied was comparable to that reported from other countries. However, the programme had a high attrition rate, possibly due to patient-related factors and operational constraints. LESSONS LEARNT: A high rate of attrition can affect the overall efficacy and functioning of an ART programme. Addressing the issues causing attrition might improve patient outcomes in India and in other resource-constrained countries.
Authors: C C Whalen; P Nsubuga; A Okwera; J L Johnson; D L Hom; N L Michael; R D Mugerwa; J J Ellner Journal: AIDS Date: 2000-06-16 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: F J Palella; K M Delaney; A C Moorman; M O Loveless; J Fuhrer; G A Satten; D J Aschman; S D Holmberg Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1998-03-26 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Jeffrey S A Stringer; Isaac Zulu; Jens Levy; Elizabeth M Stringer; Albert Mwango; Benjamin H Chi; Vilepe Mtonga; Stewart Reid; Ronald A Cantrell; Marc Bulterys; Michael S Saag; Richard G Marlink; Alwyn Mwinga; Tedd V Ellerbrock; Moses Sinkala Journal: JAMA Date: 2006-08-16 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Patrice Severe; Paul Leger; Macarthur Charles; Francine Noel; Gerry Bonhomme; Gyrlande Bois; Erik George; Stefan Kenel-Pierre; Peter F Wright; Roy Gulick; Warren D Johnson; Jean William Pape; Daniel W Fitzgerald Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2005-12-01 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: A Mocroft; S Vella; T L Benfield; A Chiesi; V Miller; P Gargalianos; A d'Arminio Monforte; I Yust; J N Bruun; A N Phillips; J D Lundgren Journal: Lancet Date: 1998-11-28 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Paula Braitstein; Martin W G Brinkhof; François Dabis; Mauro Schechter; Andrew Boulle; Paolo Miotti; Robin Wood; Christian Laurent; Eduardo Sprinz; Catherine Seyler; David R Bangsberg; Eric Balestre; Jonathan A C Sterne; Margaret May; Matthias Egger Journal: Lancet Date: 2006-03-11 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Adeline Nyamathi; Alecia Y Hanson; Benissa E Salem; Sanjeev Sinha; Kalyan K Ganguly; Barbara Leake; Kartik Yadav; Mary Marfisee Journal: Nurs Res Date: 2012 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 2.381
Authors: Sowmyanarayanan V Thuppal; Christine A Wanke; Farzad Noubary; Joshua T Cohen; Mkaya Mwamburi; Abraham C Ooriapdickal; Jayaprakash Muliyil; Gagandeep Kang; George M Varghese; Priscilla Rupali; Rajiv Karthik; Rajkumar Sathasivam; Peace Clarance; Susanne A Pulimood; Dincy Peter; Leni George Journal: Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg Date: 2015-03-15 Impact factor: 2.184
Authors: James H McMahon; Julian H Elliott; Steven Y Hong; Silvia Bertagnolio; Michael R Jordan Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-02-12 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Manisha V Ghate; Sunil S Zirpe; Nilam P Gurav; Bharat B Rewari; Raman R Gangakhedkar; Ramesh S Paranjape Journal: Indian J Sex Transm Dis AIDS Date: 2014 Jul-Dec