T Kuhnt1, A Sandner2, T Wendt3, R Engenhart-Cabillic4, G Lammering5, M Flentje6, G Grabenbauer7, A Schreiber8, A Pirnasch9, J Dunst10. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Rostock, Rostock. Electronic address: thomas.kuhnt@uni-rostock.de. 2. Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Martin-Luther-University, Halle-Wittenberg. 3. Department of Radiation Oncology, Friedrich-Schiller-University, Jena. 4. Department of Radiation Oncology, Phillips-University, Marburg, Germany. 5. Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro Clinic), Maastricht, The Netherlands; Department of Radiation Therapy and Radiation Oncology, University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf. 6. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Würzburg, Würzburg. 7. Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Coburg, Coburg. 8. Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Dresden-Friedrichstadt, Friedrichstadt. 9. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Rostock, Rostock. 10. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cetuximab is active in the treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN), enhancing both radiotherapy and chemotherapy effects. This phase I study was designed to investigate the safety and tolerability of combining weekly cisplatin treatment with cetuximab and hyperfractionated-accelerated radiotherapy (HART) for locally advanced SCCHN. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with unresectable stage III or IVA/B SCCHN were treated with cetuximab, 400 mg/m² initial dose on day -7 of HART, followed by 250 mg/m² weekly during the administration of HART, which started with 2.0 Gy/day (5 days/week) for 3 weeks followed by 1.4 Gy/twice-daily (Monday to Friday) for another 3 weeks, resulting in a total dose of 70.6 Gy. Cisplatin was administered weekly starting on the first day of radiotherapy until week 6. Cisplatin was dose escalated of four dose levels from 20 to 40 mg/m² using a classical 3 + 3 dose escalation algorithm. RESULTS: Eighteen patients were enrolled. Sixteen patients were eligible for toxicity, and 15 for response. No maximum tolerated dose was reached for cisplatin. One of six patients of dose level 4 had grade 4 neutropenia. This patient died 1 week after the end of the study treatment. The most common types of grade 3+ adverse events were mucositis (9 of 16 patients), in-field dermatitis (6 of 16 patients) and neutropenia (4 of 16 patients). Cetuximab-related hypersensitivity was observed in 1 out of 18 patients. Six weeks after the end of the study treatment, 5 complete responses, 8 partial responses and 1 progressive disease (at distant sites) were documented in a total of 15 patients (objective response rate 87%). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of cisplatin with cetuximab and HART is active, well tolerated and merits additional investigation. The recommended weekly dose of cisplatin for phase II studies is 40 mg/m².
BACKGROUND:Cetuximab is active in the treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN), enhancing both radiotherapy and chemotherapy effects. This phase I study was designed to investigate the safety and tolerability of combining weekly cisplatin treatment with cetuximab and hyperfractionated-accelerated radiotherapy (HART) for locally advanced SCCHN. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with unresectable stage III or IVA/B SCCHN were treated with cetuximab, 400 mg/m² initial dose on day -7 of HART, followed by 250 mg/m² weekly during the administration of HART, which started with 2.0 Gy/day (5 days/week) for 3 weeks followed by 1.4 Gy/twice-daily (Monday to Friday) for another 3 weeks, resulting in a total dose of 70.6 Gy. Cisplatin was administered weekly starting on the first day of radiotherapy until week 6. Cisplatin was dose escalated of four dose levels from 20 to 40 mg/m² using a classical 3 + 3 dose escalation algorithm. RESULTS: Eighteen patients were enrolled. Sixteen patients were eligible for toxicity, and 15 for response. No maximum tolerated dose was reached for cisplatin. One of six patients of dose level 4 had grade 4 neutropenia. This patient died 1 week after the end of the study treatment. The most common types of grade 3+ adverse events were mucositis (9 of 16 patients), in-field dermatitis (6 of 16 patients) and neutropenia (4 of 16 patients). Cetuximab-related hypersensitivity was observed in 1 out of 18 patients. Six weeks after the end of the study treatment, 5 complete responses, 8 partial responses and 1 progressive disease (at distant sites) were documented in a total of 15 patients (objective response rate 87%). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of cisplatin with cetuximab and HART is active, well tolerated and merits additional investigation. The recommended weekly dose of cisplatin for phase II studies is 40 mg/m².
Authors: L Miszczyk; B Maciejewski; A Tukiendorf; G Woźniak; B Jochymek; A Gawryszuk; M Szweda Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2014-07-16 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Thomas Kuhnt; Andreas Schreiber; Anett Pirnasch; Matthias G Hautmann; Peter Hass; Frank P Sieker; Rita Engenhart-Cabillic; Michael Richter; Kathrin Dellas; Jürgen Dunst Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2017-05-12 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: Thomas Gehrke; Agmal Scherzad; Pascal Ickrath; Philipp Schendzielorz; Rudolf Hagen; Norbert Kleinsasser; Stephan Hackenberg Journal: Cancer Biol Ther Date: 2017-05-11 Impact factor: 4.742
Authors: Daisuke Sano; Fumihiko Matsumoto; David R Valdecanas; Mei Zhao; David P Molkentine; Yoko Takahashi; Ehab Y Hanna; Vali Papadimitrakopoulou; John Heymach; Luka Milas; Jeffrey N Myers Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2011-02-24 Impact factor: 12.531