C Y Lin1, R M Arnold, J R Lave, D C Angus, A E Barnato. 1. Center for Research on Health Care and the Institute for Clinical Research Education, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, 200 Meyran Avenue, Suite 200, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Improving end-of-life care in the hospital is a national priority. PURPOSE: To explore the prevalence and reasons for implementation of hospital-wide and intensive care unit (ICU) practices relevant to quality care in key end-of-life care domains and to discern major structural determinants of practice implementation. DESIGN: Cross-sectional mixed-mode survey of chief nursing officers of Pennsylvania acute care hospitals. RESULTS: The response rate was 74% (129 of 174). The prevalence of hospital and ICU practices ranged from 95% for a hospital-wide formal code policy to 6% for regularly scheduled family meetings with an attending physician in the ICU. Most practices had less than 50% implementation; most were implemented primarily for quality improvement or to keep up with the standard of care. In a multivariable model including hospital structural characteristics, only hospital size independently predicted the presence of one or more hospital initiatives (ethics consult service, OR 6.13, adjusted p = 0.02; private conference room in the ICU for family meetings, OR 4.54, adjusted p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: There is low penetration of hospital practices relevant to quality end-of-life care in Pennsylvania acute care hospitals. Our results may serve to inform the development of future benchmark goals. It is critical to establish a strong evidence base for the practices most associated with improved end-of-life care outcomes and to develop quality measures for end-of-life care to complement existing hospital quality measures that primarily focus on life extension.
BACKGROUND: Improving end-of-life care in the hospital is a national priority. PURPOSE: To explore the prevalence and reasons for implementation of hospital-wide and intensive care unit (ICU) practices relevant to quality care in key end-of-life care domains and to discern major structural determinants of practice implementation. DESIGN: Cross-sectional mixed-mode survey of chief nursing officers of Pennsylvania acute care hospitals. RESULTS: The response rate was 74% (129 of 174). The prevalence of hospital and ICU practices ranged from 95% for a hospital-wide formal code policy to 6% for regularly scheduled family meetings with an attending physician in the ICU. Most practices had less than 50% implementation; most were implemented primarily for quality improvement or to keep up with the standard of care. In a multivariable model including hospital structural characteristics, only hospital size independently predicted the presence of one or more hospital initiatives (ethics consult service, OR 6.13, adjusted p = 0.02; private conference room in the ICU for family meetings, OR 4.54, adjusted p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: There is low penetration of hospital practices relevant to quality end-of-life care in Pennsylvania acute care hospitals. Our results may serve to inform the development of future benchmark goals. It is critical to establish a strong evidence base for the practices most associated with improved end-of-life care outcomes and to develop quality measures for end-of-life care to complement existing hospital quality measures that primarily focus on life extension.
Authors: Elena Aldasoro; Adelina Pérez Alonso; Laureano Ribacoba; Santiago Esnaola; Maite Olaizola; Jose Antonio Carrera; Ana Bañuelos; Rosa Rico Journal: Int J Technol Assess Health Care Date: 2005 Impact factor: 2.188
Authors: Eva Grunfeld; Robin Urquhart; Eric Mykhalovskiy; Amy Folkes; Grace Johnston; Frederick I Burge; Craig C Earle; Susan Dent Journal: Cancer Date: 2008-05-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Laetitia Veerbeek; Lia van Zuylen; Siebe J Swart; Paul J van der Maas; Elsbeth de Vogel-Voogt; Carin Cd van der Rijt; Agnes van der Heide Journal: Palliat Med Date: 2008-03 Impact factor: 4.762
Authors: Karl A Lorenz; Joanne Lynn; Sydney M Dy; Lisa R Shugarman; Anne Wilkinson; Richard A Mularski; Sally C Morton; Ronda G Hughes; Lara K Hilton; Margaret Maglione; Shannon L Rhodes; Cony Rolon; Virginia C Sun; Paul G Shekelle Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2008-01-15 Impact factor: 25.391