Literature DB >> 20427303

Cardiometabolic treatment decisions in patients with type 2 diabetes: the role of repeated measurements and medication burden.

J Voorham1, F M Haaijer-Ruskamp, B H R Wolffenbuttel, R P Stolk, P Denig.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Clinical guidelines for cardiometabolic risk management indicate a simple threshold-based strategy for treatment, but physicians and their patients may be reluctant to modify drug treatment after a single elevated measurement. We determined how repeated measurements of blood pressure, cholesterol and haemoglobin A1c affect general practitioners' decisions to start or intensify medication in patients with type 2 diabetes. We also evaluated whether medication burden altered these decisions.
METHODS: We conducted a cohort study in 3029 patients managed by 62 general practitioners (GPs). We assessed the predictive value of the last risk factor measurement, the number of successive measurements above target level and the percentage change between the last two measurements. Medication burden was assessed as the number of drugs concurrently used. Effects on treatment decisions were estimated by multilevel logistic regression analysis, correcting for clustering at GP level.
RESULTS: Repeated high levels of diastolic blood pressure increased the likelihood to start antihypertensive medication (OR=2.08, CI 1.37 to 3.17). Repeated high haemoglobin A1c levels affected intensification of oral glucose-lowering medication (OR=1.71, CI 1.44 to 2.03). Modification of lipid-lowering medication was limited, and only affected by the last total cholesterol level. Starting treatment for all three risk factors, as well as intensifying antihypertensive treatment, was more likely in patients already using more drugs for other chronic diseases.
CONCLUSIONS: Waiting for the next measurement before deciding to change medication can explain in part the apparent undertreatment for hypertension and hyperglycaemia, but not for hypercholesterolaemia. Medication burden was not a barrier for treatment modification.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20427303     DOI: 10.1136/qshc.2008.030106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care        ISSN: 1475-3898


  6 in total

1.  A longitudinal study examining adherence to guidelines in diabetes care according to different definitions of adequacy and timeliness.

Authors:  Grigory Sidorenkov; Flora M Haaijer-Ruskamp; Dick de Zeeuw; Petra Denig
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-09-08       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Differential effects of comorbidity on antihypertensive and glucose-regulating treatment in diabetes mellitus--a cohort study.

Authors:  Jaco Voorham; Flora M Haaijer-Ruskamp; Bruce H R Wolffenbuttel; Dick de Zeeuw; Ronald P Stolk; Petra Denig
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-05       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Family physician clinical inertia in glycemic control among patients with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Valerija Bralić Lang; Biserka Bergman Marković; Ksenija Kranjčević
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2015-02-05

4.  Treatment Intensification for Hypertension in US Ambulatory Medical Care.

Authors:  Lin Mu; Kenneth J Mukamal
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2016-10-22       Impact factor: 5.501

Review 5.  Measuring the burden of treatment for chronic disease: implications of a scoping review of the literature.

Authors:  Adem Sav; Asiyeh Salehi; Frances S Mair; Sara S McMillan
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 4.615

6.  Complexity of Medicine Regimens and Patient Perception of Medicine Burden.

Authors:  Janet Krska; Sarah A Corlett; Barbra Katusiime
Journal:  Pharmacy (Basel)       Date:  2019-02-02
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.