Literature DB >> 20425815

Challenges in clinical interpretation of microduplications detected by array CGH analysis.

Pawel Stankiewicz1, Amber N Pursley, Sau Wai Cheung.   

Abstract

Due to the lack of robust diagnostic methods and limited resolution of conventional microscopy, submicroscopic genomic duplication copy number variants (CNVs) have been long underascertained. The development of array CGH has enabled detection of microduplications with nearly the same sensitivity as microdeletions and thus allowing them to be routinely identified throughout the human genome. However, in contrast to microdeletions, clinical interpretation of microduplications more often presents a diagnostic dilemma, as the functional impact of these genomic alterations is not well understood. Microduplications are especially difficult to interpret when they encompass several genes or a portion of a gene. Determining their significance involves investigative teamwork between both the diagnostic laboratory and the clinician. We present the steps for interpreting the clinical significance of microduplications and representative examples of these challenging cases. Copyright 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20425815     DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.33216

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Genet A        ISSN: 1552-4825            Impact factor:   2.802


  17 in total

1.  Severe intellectual disability and autistic features associated with microduplication 2q23.1.

Authors:  Brian H Y Chung; Sureni Mullegama; Christian R Marshall; Anath C Lionel; Rosanna Weksberg; Lucie Dupuis; Lauren Brick; Chumei Li; Stephen W Scherer; Swaroop Aradhya; D James Stavropoulos; Sarah H Elsea; Roberto Mendoza-Londono
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 4.246

2.  Practical guidelines for interpreting copy number gains detected by high-resolution array in routine diagnostics.

Authors:  Nicolien M Hanemaaijer; Birgit Sikkema-Raddatz; Gerben van der Vries; Trijnie Dijkhuizen; Roel Hordijk; Anthonie J van Essen; Hermine E Veenstra-Knol; Wilhelmina S Kerstjens-Frederikse; Johanna C Herkert; Erica H Gerkes; Lamberta K Leegte; Klaas Kok; Richard J Sinke; Conny M A van Ravenswaaij-Arts
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 4.246

3.  Copy number gain at Xp22.31 includes complex duplication rearrangements and recurrent triplications.

Authors:  Pengfei Liu; Ayelet Erez; Sandesh C Sreenath Nagamani; Weimin Bi; Claudia M B Carvalho; Alexandra D Simmons; Joanna Wiszniewska; Ping Fang; Patricia A Eng; M Lance Cooper; V Reid Sutton; Elizabeth R Roeder; John B Bodensteiner; Mauricio R Delgado; Siddharth K Prakash; John W Belmont; Pawel Stankiewicz; Jonathan S Berg; Marwan Shinawi; Ankita Patel; Sau Wai Cheung; James R Lupski
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2011-02-25       Impact factor: 6.150

4.  Unbalanced X;9 translocation in an infertile male with de novo duplication Xp22.31p22.33.

Authors:  Fani-Marlen Roumelioti; Eirini Louizou; Spyridon Karras; Rozalia Neroutsou; Voula Velissariou; Sarantis Gagos
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 5.  Mechanisms underlying structural variant formation in genomic disorders.

Authors:  Claudia M B Carvalho; James R Lupski
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 53.242

6.  Balanced reciprocal translocation t(5;13)(q33;q12) and 9q31.1 microduplication in a man suffering from infertility and pollinosis.

Authors:  Ruth Mikelsaar; Mari Nelis; Ants Kurg; Olga Zilina; Paul Korrovits; Ranno Rätsep; Maie Väli
Journal:  J Appl Genet       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Mechanisms for nonrecurrent genomic rearrangements associated with CMT1A or HNPP: rare CNVs as a cause for missing heritability.

Authors:  Feng Zhang; Pavel Seeman; Pengfei Liu; Marian A J Weterman; Claudia Gonzaga-Jauregui; Charles F Towne; Sat Dev Batish; Els De Vriendt; Peter De Jonghe; Bernd Rautenstrauss; Klaus-Henning Krause; Mehrdad Khajavi; Jan Posadka; Antoon Vandenberghe; Francesc Palau; Lionel Van Maldergem; Frank Baas; Vincent Timmerman; James R Lupski
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-05-20       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  Alu-specific microhomology-mediated deletion of the final exon of SPAST in three unrelated subjects with hereditary spastic paraplegia.

Authors:  Philip M Boone; Pengfei Liu; Feng Zhang; Claudia M B Carvalho; Charles F Towne; Sat Dev Batish; James R Lupski
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 9.  Genetic diagnosis of autism spectrum disorders: the opportunity and challenge in the genomics era.

Authors:  Yong-Hui Jiang; Yi Wang; Xu Xiu; Kwong Wai Choy; Amber Nolen Pursley; Sau W Cheung
Journal:  Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci       Date:  2014-05-30       Impact factor: 6.250

Review 10.  Clinical impact of copy number variation analysis using high-resolution microarray technologies: advantages, limitations and concerns.

Authors:  Curtis R Coughlin; Gunter H Scharer; Tamim H Shaikh
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2012-10-30       Impact factor: 11.117

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.