Literature DB >> 20425548

Survival of patients treated by an autonomic nerve-preserving gastrectomy for early gastric cancer.

Shinsuke Sasada1, Motoki Ninomiya, Masahiko Nishizaki, Masao Harano, Yasutomo Ojima, Hiroyoshi Matsukawa, Shigehiro Shiozaki, Satoshi Ohno, Norihisa Takakura.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Autonomic nerve preservation in a gastrectomy for gastric cancer improves the postoperative quality of life. We retrospectively examined the survival of patients treated by an autonomic nerve-preserving gastrectomy in comparison to the survival of the patients treated by a conventional gastrectomy.
METHODS: The survival of 385 patients treated by an autonomic nerve-preserving gastrectomy for clinical early gastric cancer (the ANP group) was compared with that of 285 patients treated by a conventional gastrectomy (non-ANP group).
RESULTS: Among the ANP group, the numbers of patients with tumor invasion to the mucosa, submucosa, and muscularis propria were 210, 166, and 9, respectively, whereas the numbers of patients with lymph node metastasis grades of N0, N1, and N2 were 360, 21, and 4, respectively. The overall 5-year survival rate of the ANP group was 94.7%, which was superior to that of the non-ANP group (90.4%; P = 0.003). The 5-year survival rates of patients with lymph node metastasis were 94.9% and 91.8% in the ANP and non-ANP groups, respectively (P = 0.733). Only 3 patients in the ANP group died from gastric cancer.
CONCLUSIONS: The survival of patients treated by an autonomic nerve-preserving gastrectomy was equivalent to that of patients treated by a conventional gastrectomy, thus suggesting that an autonomic nervepreserving gastrectomy could be a useful procedure for the treatment of early gastric cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20425548     DOI: 10.1007/s00595-009-4067-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Today        ISSN: 0941-1291            Impact factor:   2.549


  19 in total

1.  In situ neural isolation of the entire canine upper gut: effects on fasting and fed motility patterns.

Authors:  M R Siadati; M M Murr; M K Foley; J A Duenes; J L Steers; M G Sarr
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.982

2.  The relationship of cholelithiasis to vagotomy.

Authors:  Z Mujahed; J A Evans
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1971-10

3.  Postoperative evaluation of pylorus-preserving procedures compared with conventional distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer.

Authors:  T Hotta; K Taniguchi; Y Kobayashi; K Johata; M Sahara; T Naka; S Terashita; S Yokoyama; K Matsuyama
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 4.  Function-preserving surgery for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Hitoshi Katai
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Gallstones after vagotomy.

Authors:  M Ihasz; C A Griffith
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 2.565

6.  Effects of celiac and superior mesenteric ganglionectomy on interdigestive myoelectric complex in dogs.

Authors:  J A Marlett; C F Code
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1979-11

7.  The epidemiology of gallbladder disease: observations in the Framingham Study.

Authors:  G D Friedman; W B Kannel; T R Dawber
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1966-03

8.  Immediate effect of vagotomy on pancreatic insulin secretion.

Authors:  I Nordback; E Harju
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 23.059

9.  Five- to eight-year results of truncal vagotomy and pyloroplasty for duodenal ulcer.

Authors:  J C Goligher; C N Pulvertaft; T T Irvin; D Johnston; B Walder; R A Hall; J Willson-Pepper; T S Matheson
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1972-01-01

10.  Incidence of gallstones development after selective hepatic vagotomy.

Authors:  A Csendes; J Larach; M Godoy
Journal:  Acta Chir Scand       Date:  1978
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.