Literature DB >> 20424838

Aesthetic refinements and reoperative procedures following 370 consecutive DIEP and SIEA flap breast reconstructions: important considerations for patient consent.

Morteza Enajat1, Jeroen M Smit, Warren M Rozen, Ed H M Hartman, Anders Liss, Morten Kildal, Thorir Audolfsson, Rafael Acosta.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Breast reconstruction often requires multiple operations. In addition to potential complications requiring reoperation, additional procedures are frequently essential in order to complete the reconstructive process, with aesthetic outcome and breast symmetry shown to be the most important factors in patient satisfaction. Despite the importance of these reoperations in decision-making and the consent process, a thorough review of the need for such operations has not been definitively explored.
METHODS: A review of 370 consecutive autologous breast reconstructions (326 patients) was undertaken, comprising 365 deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flaps and 5 superficial inferior epigastric artery (SIEA) flaps. The need for additional procedures for either complications or aesthetic refinement following initial breast reconstruction was assessed.
RESULTS: Overall, there was an average of 1.06 additional interventions for every patient carried out after primary reconstructive surgery. Of 326 patients, 46 underwent early postoperative operations for surgical complications (0.17 additional operations per patient as a consequence of complications). Procedures for aesthetic refinement included those performed on the reconstructed breast, contralateral breast, or abdominal donor site. Procedures for aesthetic refinement included nipple reconstruction, nipple-areola complex tattooing, dog-ear correction, liposuction, lipofilling, scar revision, mastopexy, and reduction mammaplasty.
CONCLUSION: While DIEP flap surgery for breast reconstruction provides favorable results, patients frequently require additional procedures to improve aesthetic outcomes. The need for reoperation is an important part of the consent process prior to reconstructive surgery, and patients should recognize the likelihood of at least one additional procedure following initial reconstruction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20424838     DOI: 10.1007/s00266-009-9424-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg        ISSN: 0364-216X            Impact factor:   2.326


  9 in total

1.  Destination Design msTRAM: For Greater Reconstructive Certainty.

Authors:  Stahs Pripotnev; J Scott Williamson
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2021-07-28

2.  Aesthetical outcome after breast reconstruction using deep inferior epigastric perforator flap: Personal techniques.

Authors:  Chiara Gelati; Luca Negosanti; Erich Fabbri; Riccardo Cipriani
Journal:  Indian J Plast Surg       Date:  2013-09

3.  The efficacy of simultaneous breast reconstruction and contralateral balancing procedures in reducing the need for second stage operations.

Authors:  Mark L Smith; Emily M Clarke-Pearson; Michael Vornovitsky; Joseph H Dayan; William Samson; Mark R Sultan
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2014-09-15

4.  Big data analysis of the risk factors and rates of perioperative transfusion in immediate autologous breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Woo Jin Song; Hee Jin Kim; Nam Kyong Choi; Jung Ho Lee; Sang Gue Kang; Bommie Florence Seo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Sequelae of fat grafting postmastectomy: an algorithm for management of fat necrosis.

Authors:  Erin L Doren; Rajiv P Parikh; Christine Laronga; Matthew E Hiro; Weihong Sun; Marie Catherine Lee; Paul D Smith; William J Fulp
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2012-12-04

6.  The deep inferior epigastric perforator and pedicled transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap in breast reconstruction: a comparative study.

Authors:  Shane Tan; Jane Lim; Jacklyn Yek; Wei Chen Ong; Chor Hoong Hing; Thiam Chye Lim
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2013-05-16

7.  Refined Method of Lipofilling following DIEP Breast Reconstruction: 3D Analysis of Graft Survival.

Authors:  Xavier Nelissen; Florence Lhoest; Laurence Preud'Homme
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2015-09-25

8.  Teaching Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction-A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Sebastian Fischer; Yannick F Diehm; Dimitra Kotsougiani-Fischer; Emre Gazyakan; Christian A Radu; Thomas Kremer; Christoph Hirche; Ulrich Kneser
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 4.241

9.  The transverse musculocutaneous gracilis flap for autologous breast reconstruction: focus on donor site morbidity.

Authors:  Laura C Siegwart; Sebastian Fischer; Yannick F Diehm; Jörg M Heil; Christoph Hirche; Ulrich Kneser; Dimitra Kotsougiani-Fischer
Journal:  Breast Cancer       Date:  2021-06-06       Impact factor: 4.239

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.