Literature DB >> 20424498

Is longer-term psychodynamic psychotherapy more effective than shorter-term therapies? Review and critique of the evidence.

Sunil S Bhar1, Brett D Thombs, Monica Pignotti, Marielle Bassel, Lisa Jewett, James C Coyne, Aaron T Beck.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In 2008, Leichsenring and Rabung performed a meta-analysis of 8 studies of longer-term psychodynamic psychotherapy (LTPP). The work was published in the Journal of the American Medical Association (vol. 300, pp 1551-1565), and they concluded that LTPP was more effective than shorter-term therapies.
METHOD: Given that such claims have the potential to influence treatment decisions and policies, we re-examined the meta-analysis and the 8 studies.
RESULTS: We found a miscalculation of the effect sizes used to make key comparisons. Claims for the effectiveness of LTPP depended on a set of small, underpowered studies that were highly heterogeneous in terms of patients treated, interventions, comparison-control groups, and outcomes. LTPP was compared to 12 types of comparison-controls, including control groups that did not involve any psychotherapy, short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy, and unvalidated treatments. Additionally, the studies failed to protect against threats to bias, and had poor internal validity.
CONCLUSION: Overall, we found no evidence to support claims of superiority of LTPP over shorter-term methods of psychotherapy. Copyright 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20424498      PMCID: PMC2889262          DOI: 10.1159/000313689

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychother Psychosom        ISSN: 0033-3190            Impact factor:   17.659


  34 in total

Review 1.  The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials.

Authors:  D Moher; K F Schulz; D G Altman
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2001-04-17       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 2.  Treatment integrity in psychotherapy research: analysis of the studies and examination of the associated factors.

Authors:  Francheska Perepletchikova; Teresa A Treat; Alan E Kazdin
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2007-12

3.  Analyzing effectiveness of long-term psychodynamic psychotherapy.

Authors:  Brett D Thombs; Marielle Bassel; Lisa R Jewett
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Analyzing effectiveness of long-term psychodynamic psychotherapy.

Authors:  Levente Kriston; Lars Hölzel; Martin Härter
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Analyzing effectiveness of long-term psychodynamic psychotherapy.

Authors:  Stefan Roepke; Babette Renneberg
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Analyzing effectiveness of long-term psychodynamic psychotherapy.

Authors:  Aaron T Beck; Sunil S Bhar
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias.

Authors:  C B Begg; M Mazumdar
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Empirical comparison of two psychological therapies. Self psychology and cognitive orientation in the treatment of anorexia and bulimia.

Authors:  E Bachar; Y Latzer; S Kreitler; E M Berry
Journal:  J Psychother Pract Res       Date:  1999

9.  Evaluating three treatments for borderline personality disorder: a multiwave study.

Authors:  John F Clarkin; Kenneth N Levy; Mark F Lenzenweger; Otto F Kernberg
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 18.112

Review 10.  A systematic evaluation of the quality of meta-analyses in the critical care literature.

Authors:  Anthony Delaney; Sean M Bagshaw; Andre Ferland; Braden Manns; Kevin B Laupland; Christopher J Doig
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2005-09-09       Impact factor: 9.097

View more
  5 in total

1.  The effectiveness of psychodynamic psychotherapies: An update.

Authors:  Peter Fonagy
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 49.548

2.  [Psychodynamic therapy of depression].

Authors:  F Leichsenring; S Rabung
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 1.214

3.  Dealing with clinical heterogeneity in meta-analysis. Assumptions, methods, interpretation.

Authors:  Levente Kriston
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 4.035

4.  Tracking functional brain changes in patients with depression under psychodynamic psychotherapy using individualized stimuli.

Authors:  Daniel Wiswede; Svenja Taubner; Anna Buchheim; Thomas F Münte; Michael Stasch; Manfred Cierpka; Horst Kächele; Gerhard Roth; Peter Erhard; Henrik Kessler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-02       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Psychoanalytic and cognitive-behavior therapy of chronic depression: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Manfred E Beutel; Marianne Leuzinger-Bohleber; Bernhard Rüger; Ulrich Bahrke; Alexa Negele; Antje Haselbacher; Georg Fiedler; Wolfram Keller; Martin Hautzinger
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2012-07-26       Impact factor: 2.279

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.