Literature DB >> 20424221

Cardiovascular disease mortality in Europeans in relation to fasting and 2-h plasma glucose levels within a normoglycemic range.

Feng Ning1, Jaakko Tuomilehto, Kalevi Pyörälä, Altan Onat, Stefan Söderberg, Qing Qiao.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study mortality in relation to fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and 2-h plasma glucose levels within the normoglycemic range. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Data from 19 European cohorts comprising 12,566 men and 10,874 women who had FPG <6.1 mmol/l and 2-h plasma glucose <7.8 mmol/l at baseline examination were analyzed. Multivariate-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs for deaths from cardiovascular disease (CVD), non-CVD, and all causes were estimated for individuals whose 2-h plasma glucose > FPG (group II) compared with those whose 2-h plasma glucose ≤ FPG (group I).
RESULTS: A total of 827 (246) CVD and 611 (351) non-CVD and 1,438 (597) all-cause deaths occurred in men (women). Group II was older and had higher BMI, blood pressure, and fasting insulin than group I. The multivariate-adjusted HRs (95% CIs) for CVD, non-CVD, and all-cause mortality were 1.22 (1.05-1.41), 1.09 (0.92-1.29), and 1.16 (1.04-1.30) in men and 1.40 (1.03-1.89), 0.99 (0.79-1.25), and 1.13 (0.94-1.35) in women, respectively, for group II as compared with group I. HRs were 1.25 (1.05-1.50), 1.09 (0.89-1.34), and 1.18 (1.03-1.35) in men and 1.60 (1.03-2.48), 1.05 (0.78-1.42), and 1.18 (0.93-1.51) in women, respectively, after additional adjustment for fasting insulin in a subgroup of individuals.
CONCLUSIONS: In individuals with both FPG and 2-h plasma glucose within the normoglycemic range, high 2-h plasma glucose was associated with insulin resistance and increased CVD mortality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20424221      PMCID: PMC2945162          DOI: 10.2337/dc09-2328

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Care        ISSN: 0149-5992            Impact factor:   19.112


It is well known that type 2 diabetes (1,2) and nondiabetic hyperglycemia such as impaired glucose tolerance are risk factors for cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality (3–5). The relations of fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and 2-h plasma glucose with CVD mortality and morbidity have been extensively investigated during the last few decades (6–9). Evidence has shown that 2-h plasma glucose is a stronger risk predictor than FPG for incident coronary heart disease (6) and CVD mortality (7), but little is known about the impact of FPG versus 2-h plasma glucose in the normoglycemic range. It has been suggested that individuals with normoglycemia, whose 2-h plasma glucose did not return to the FPG levels during an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) had a significantly higher risk of developing type 2 diabetes (10) and a worse cardiovascular risk factor profile (11) than individuals whose 2-h plasma glucose returned to the FPG levels. In the current study, based on the data of the Diabetes Epidemiology: Collaborative Analysis of Diagnostic Criteria in Europe (DECODE) study, we compared CVD mortality in individuals whose 2-h plasma glucose was higher than FPG with those whose 2-h plasma glucose was equal to or lower than FPG.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

The methods to recruit participants for the DECODE cohorts have been described previously (6,12–14). In brief, the database was collected from researchers who had performed epidemiological studies using a standard OGTT in Europe. Data of individuals from participating study centers were sent to the Diabetes Prevention Unit, Department of Chronic Disease Prevention of the National Institute for Health and Welfare in Helsinki, Finland, for analyses. Each study had been approved by the local ethics committees, and the ethics committee of the National Institute for Health and Welfare approved the data analysis. In this article, only the cohorts with prospective data on cause-specific mortality and with all required covariates of BMI, blood pressure, total cholesterol, and smoking status were included. Subjects with known diabetes and those classified as having newly diagnosed diabetes and pre-diabetes according to the World Health Organization/International Diabetes Federation 2006 criteria (15) were excluded from the current study. Thus, the current data analysis is restricted to normoglycemic individuals whose FPG <6.1 mmol/l and 2-h plasma glucose <7.8 mmol/l (15), comprising 12,566 (53.6% of all participants) men and 10,874 (46.4%) women aged 25–90 years from 19 European cohorts. The maximum duration of follow-up ranged from 4.8 to 36.8 years among different cohorts with a median follow-up of 9.0 years. According to FPG and 2-h plasma glucose levels, these individuals were further divided into two groups. In group I, an individual's 2-h plasma glucose concentration was equal to or less than his or her FPG, whereas in group II, 2-h plasma glucose was greater than FPG. BMI was defined as the individual's body weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters. An individual with a history of hypertension diagnosed by a physician or having systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≥140 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) ≥90 mmHg was classified as having hypertension (16). Smoking status was classified as current smoker, former smoker, or nonsmoker.

Definition of fatal events

Vital status was recorded for each of the subjects attending the baseline examination in all of the studies. Subjects who had emigrated and for whom vital status could not be confirmed were treated as censored at the time of emigration. Causes of death were coded according to ICD-9 (ICD-10). Total CVD death was defined as ICD codes 401–448 (I10–I79); all other deaths were classified as non-CVD.

Statistical methods

A general linear model of univariate ANOVA was used to estimate means adjusted for age and cohort. The χ2 test was used to test the difference in proportions between groups. Considering the difference in laboratory assays of fasting insulin between cohorts, we determined a z score (z = [χ − μ]/σ) transformation for fasting insulin for each cohort before the data were pooled together. The assumption of the proportionality was examined using log minus log survival plots for each categorical variable. None of these indicated departure from the assumption of the proportionality of hazards. Cox proportional hazards analysis was used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) and their 95% CIs for CVD, non-CVD, and all-cause mortality. The models were adjusted for age, cohort, FPG, BMI, total cholesterol, smoking status, hypertension status, and fasting insulin. The difference between the 2-h plasma glucose and the FPG (2-h plasma glucose − FPG) as a continuous variable was also fitted in a separate multivariable model to examine whether the relationship was linear. In addition, to check whether the “return of the 2-h plasma glucose to the FPG level” was determined by the FPG levels, the comparison of group II versus group I was further made in two FPG subgroups: FPG ≤5.6 mmol/l and 5.6 mmol/l < FPG <6.1 mmol/l. Cumulative survival curves were derived from the same multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS for Windows (version 15.0; SPSS Inc. Chicago, IL). P < 0.05 (two-tailed) was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

A total of 1,438 deaths in men and 597 in women occurred during the follow-up. Among these, 827 men and 246 women died of CVD (Table 1). Mortality from CVD and all causes was higher in group II than in group I in both men and women (P < 0.001 for all comparisons) (Table 2). People in group II were older and had significantly higher levels of BMI, blood pressure, and fasting insulin than individuals in group I for both men and women (P < 0.001 for all comparisons) (Table 2).
Table 1

Baseline characteristics of study cohorts and number of deaths from CVD, non-CVD, and all causes in individuals with FPG <6.1 mmol/l and 2-h plasma glucose <7.8 mmol/l

Countries and studiesn (men/women)Age (years)FPG (mmol/l)*2-h PG (mmol/l)*No. of deaths (men/women)
Follow-up years
CVDNon-CVDAll cause
Demark
    Glostrup461/54454 (39–70)5.4 (5.4–5.5)5.9 (5.8–5.9)98/6168/47166/10817.1 (15.6, 19.1)
Finland
    East-West187/—76 (70–90)5.2 (5.1–5.3)5.6 (5.5–5.8)69/—34/—103/—8.8 (4.6, 14.8)
    FINRISK 1987985/1,10053 (44–64)5.1 (5.1–5.1)5.6 (5.5–5.6)125/5884/60209/11819.8 (19.8, 19.9)
    FINRISK 1992566/81454 (44–64)5.3 (5.2–5.3)5.5 (5.4–5.5)28/1116/3644/4714.9 (14.8, 14.9)
    FINRISK 2002842/1,32357 (45–74)5.5 (5.5–5.5)5.5 (5.5–5.6)5/39/714/104.8 (4.8, 4.9)
    Helsinki policemen687/—45 (31–69)5.6 (5.5–5.6)5.4 (5.3–5.5)199/—108/—307/—32.9 (21.8, 36.2)
    Oulu93/17255 (55–55)5.4 (5.4–5.5)6.1 (5.9–6.2)1/29/610/810.0 (10.0, 10.1)
    Vantaa147/18865 (64–66)5.3 (5.2–5.3)6.2 (6.1–6.3)16/63/319/913.3 (13.1, 13.6)
Italy
    Cremona Study618/79457 (40–88)5.0 (5.0–5.0)4.9 (4.9–5.0)54/4766/42120/8915.1 (14.6, 15.6)
Poland
    MONICA98/11657 (44–73)5.3 (5.2–5.3)5.7 (5.5–5.8)9/13/212/36.5 (6.4, 6.5)
Sweden
    Malmö—/83454 (48–57)5.6 (5.6–5.7)6.6 (6.5–6.7)—/11—/31—/4214.6 (13.7, 17.8)
    MONICA1,315/1,36546 (25–74)5.1 (5.1–5.1)5.2 (5.2–5.3)31/1122/2153/3212.6 (2.6, 16.6)
    ULSAM651/—71 (70–74)5.1 (5.1–5.1)5.8 (5.7–5.9)62/—65/—127/—10.2 (9.1, 11.1)
The Netherlands
    Hoorn Study798/97561 (49–77)5.3 (5.2–5.3)5.0 (4.9–5.0)41/1941/3182/508.9 (8.3, 9.3)
    Zutphen Study289/—76 (70–90)5.3 (5.2–5.3)5.1 (5.0–5.7)29/—13/—42/—4.7 (4.6, 4.8)
U.K.
    ELY262/41153 (40–67)5.5 (5.5–5.5)5.6 (5.5–5.7)11/313/1724/2014.6 (13.9, 15.4)
    Goodinge Study214/34652 (39–76)5.7 (5.6–5.7)5.5 (5.4–5.6)10/77/1417/218.7 (8.4, 9.0)
    Newcastle Heart Project224/25453 (30–76)5.5 (5.5–5.5)5.5 (5.4–5.6)13/211/1224/148.9 (8.5, 9.3)
    Whitehall II study4,129/1,63849 (39–62)5.1 (5.1–5.2)5.2 (5.2–5.3)26/439/2265/265.9 (5.6, 6.1)
Total12,566/10,87454 (25–90)5.3 (5.2–5.3)5.4 (5.4–5.4)827/246611/3511,438/5979.0 (5.8, 14.9)

Data are n, mean (range), or median (25th, 75th percentiles) unless otherwise indicated.

*Age-adjusted means (95% CIs). MONICA, Monitoring of Trends and Determinants in Cardiovascular Disease; PG, plasma glucose; ULSAM, Uppsala Longitudinal Study of Adult Men.

Table 2

Baseline characteristics of participants and mortality from CVD, non-CVD, and all causes according to FPG and 2-h plasma glucose categories

Men
Women
Group I: 2-h PG ≤ FPGGroup II: 2-h PG > FPGGroup I: 2-h PG ≤ FPGGroup II: 2-h PG > FPG
n (%)6,663 (53.0)5,903 (47.0)4,096 (37.7)6,778 (62.3)
Age (years)52 (52–53)55 (55–55)52 (52–53)54 (54–54)
BMI (kg/m2)25.5 (25.4–25.6)25.9 (25.8–26.0)25.4 (25.3–25.6)26.0 (25.9–26.1)
FPG (mmol/l)5.3 (5.3–5.3)5.2 (5.2–5.2)5.2 (5.2–5.3)5.2 (5.2–5.2)
2-h PG (mmol/l)4.3 (4.3–4.4)6.2 (6.2–6.3)4.5 (4.5–4.5)6.3 (6.3–6.3)
Fasting insulin (pmol/l)*−0.03 (−0.06 to 0)0.08 (0.05–0.11)−0.11 (−0.14 to −0.08)0.04 (0.01–0.07)
Total cholesterol (mmol/l)6.2 (6.2–6.3)6.2 (6.2–6.2)6.2 (6.2–6.3)6.3 (6.2–6.3)
Blood pressure (mmHg)
    Systolic131 (130–131)133 (133–134)128 (128–129)132 (132–133)
    Diastolic81 (81–82)83 (83–83)78 (77–78)80 (80–80)
Current smoking (%)23.420.223.917.9
Hypertension (%)35.647.134.345.2
Mortality per 1,000 person years (n)
    CVD5.4 (378)7.4 (449)1.4 (59)2.3 (187)
    Non-CVD4.3 (299)5.1 (312)2.8 (122)2.9 (229)
    All-cause9.7 (677)12.5 (761)4.2 (181)5.2 (416)

Data are n (%) or age- and study-adjusted means (95% CIs).

*9,978 men and 7,350 women with z score transformation.

†P < 0.001 for different between groups in men and women.

Baseline characteristics of study cohorts and number of deaths from CVD, non-CVD, and all causes in individuals with FPG <6.1 mmol/l and 2-h plasma glucose <7.8 mmol/l Data are n, mean (range), or median (25th, 75th percentiles) unless otherwise indicated. *Age-adjusted means (95% CIs). MONICA, Monitoring of Trends and Determinants in Cardiovascular Disease; PG, plasma glucose; ULSAM, Uppsala Longitudinal Study of Adult Men. Baseline characteristics of participants and mortality from CVD, non-CVD, and all causes according to FPG and 2-h plasma glucose categories Data are n (%) or age- and study-adjusted means (95% CIs). *9,978 men and 7,350 women with z score transformation. †P < 0.001 for different between groups in men and women. The multivariate adjusted HR for CVD death was significantly higher for group II than for group I for both sexes but did not differ between the two groups for non-CVD deaths (Table 3). The results were not altered after adjustment for fasting insulin in a subgroup of the study population (9,978 men and 7,350 women) (Table 3). Further analysis in the two FPG subgroups did not change the results either (supplementary Table, available in an online appendix at http://care.diabetesjournals.org/cgi/content/full/dc09-2328/DC1). HRs (95% CI) for the CVD mortality were 1.27 (1.08–1.48) in individuals with FPG ≤5.6 mmol/l and 1.26 (1.00–1.59) in those with FPG 5.6–6.1 mmol/l, for group II compared with group I. The cumulative survival profile was better in group I than in group II for CVD mortality, but the difference for non-CVD mortality was not statistically significant (Fig. 1).
Table 3

HRs (95% CIs) for death from CVD, non-CVD, and all causes for group II compared with group I

Model 1Model 2Model 3
Men
    n12,56612,5669,978
    CVD1.16 (1.01–1.34)1.22 (1.05–1.41)1.25 (1.05–1.50)
    Non-CVD1.01 (0.86–1.19)1.09 (0.92–1.29)1.09 (0.89–1.34)
    All causes1.10 (0.99–1.22)1.16 (1.04–1.30)1.18 (1.03–1.35)
Women
    n10,87410,8747,350
    CVD1.23 (0.91–1.65)1.40 (1.03–1.89)1.60 (1.03–2.48)
    Non-CVD0.92 (0.73–1.15)0.99 (0.79–1.25)1.05 (0.78–1.42)
    All causes1.03 (0.86–1.23)1.13 (0.94–1.35)1.18 (0.93–1.51)

Model 1: adjusted for age and cohort; model 2: model 1 plus fasting plasma glucose, BMI, total cholesterol, smoking and hypertension status; model 3: model 2 plus fasting insulin. Group I, 2-h plasma glucose ≤ FPG; group II, 2-h plasma glucose > FPG.

Figure 1

Cumulative survival probability from CVD, non-CVD, and all-cause deaths derived from Cox regression analysis for group I (——) and group II (– – –) in men (A) and in women (B). The analyses are adjusted for age, cohort, FPG, BMI, total cholesterol, smoking, and hypertension status.

HRs (95% CIs) for death from CVD, non-CVD, and all causes for group II compared with group I Model 1: adjusted for age and cohort; model 2: model 1 plus fasting plasma glucose, BMI, total cholesterol, smoking and hypertension status; model 3: model 2 plus fasting insulin. Group I, 2-h plasma glucose ≤ FPG; group II, 2-h plasma glucose > FPG. Cumulative survival probability from CVD, non-CVD, and all-cause deaths derived from Cox regression analysis for group I (——) and group II (– – –) in men (A) and in women (B). The analyses are adjusted for age, cohort, FPG, BMI, total cholesterol, smoking, and hypertension status. HRs (95% CIs) corresponding to a 1-unit increase in the difference between the 2-h plasma glucose and the FPG concentrations (2-h plasma glucose-FPG) were 1.09 (1.03–1.16) for the CVD deaths, 1.04 (0.98–1.12) for non-CVD deaths, and 1.07 (1.02–1.12) for all-cause deaths in men and 1.09 (0.97–1.23), 1.00 (0.90–1.10), and 1.04 (0.96–1.12) in women, respectively. The analysis was adjusted for age, cohort, FPG, BMI, total cholesterol, smoking, and hypertension status.

CONCLUSIONS

In individuals with both FPG and 2-h plasma glucose within the normoglycemic range, elevated 2-h plasma glucose conveyed increased mortality risk from CVD but not from non-CVD. Previous studies have shown that elevated 2-h plasma glucose was a stronger CVD risk predictor than elevated FPG when both were compared with individuals with normoglycemia (6,7). Thus far, none of the studies have restricted the comparison to individuals with normoglycemia, a category being considered as having a relatively low risk for either diabetes (10,17) or CVD (11). Compared with the individuals whose 2-h plasma glucose returned to their FPG levels or lower (group I), those whose 2-h plasma glucose remained higher than their FPG (group II) were older, more obese, and hypertensive, whereas the former had lower fasting insulin concentrations and comprised more smokers. These confounding factors did not, however, explain the difference in CVD mortality between the two groups. Continuous systolic blood pressure instead of hypertension (yes versus no) did not change the results at all. The higher CVD risk associated with group II compared with group I was consistently observed in the stratified analysis in the two FPG subgroups, suggesting that the effect was independent of the FPG levels. Moreover, the excess risk was also observed for the difference between the FPG and the 2-h plasma glucose expressed as a continuous variable. Our study lends support to previous reports that the increase in CVD risk is graded with increasing 2-h plasma glucose concentration and may extend to the 2-h plasma glucose levels below the current definition for impaired glucose tolerance (4,18,19). At the low end of the FPG distribution, the CVD risk did not increase when the FPG concentration increased (4,19,20). The time that is required for the 2-h plasma glucose concentration to return to, or drop below, the FPG level depends on the insulin response during the OGTT and peripheral/hepatic insulin sensitivity (10). Fasting hyperglycemia is predominantly associated with hepatic insulin resistance and decreased first-phase insulin secretion (21), whereas an elevated postprandial glucose level is associated with peripheral insulin resistance and impairment of both early- and late-phase insulin responses (22). In the current study the 2-h plasma glucose concentration was higher in group II than in group I regardless of the elevated fasting insulin levels in group II, suggesting that insulin resistance already occurred among people with normoglycemia by the current definition. Insulin resistance and the clustering of the insulin resistance with other metabolic disorders such as obesity and hypertension might be associated with increased CVD mortality observed in group II (23,24). Because insulin levels during the OGTT were not available in the current study, further exploration of the issue is warranted. The collaborative data analysis contains some strengths. First, it provides a large sample size and statistical power, which could not be achieved by a single study alone. Second, a standard OGTT was performed in all studies to enable a further classification of people based on both FPG and 2-h plasma glucose. To reduce the discrepancies caused by differences in study design and methods among these studies, we have considered study cohort as a covariate in the Cox model and calculated a cohort-specific z score for fasting insulin, which was used in the data analysis. Another potential limitation of this analysis was the relatively low number of CVD events in women. A1C was only available in two studies: the East-West Men Study (men = 161) in Finland and the Hoorn Study (men = 798, women = 974) in the Netherlands, accounting for only 8% of the study population. The number of CVD events was also low (98 in men and 19 in women), which did not enable reasonable data analysis to check the effect of the A1C. In addition, some lifestyle-related factors such as dietary and physical activity and baseline CVD history that may have a potential contribution to the CVD were not available for all cohorts. Further studies with first-ever CVD events are required to confirm the findings. In summary, in individuals with both FPG and 2-h plasma glucose within the normoglycemic range, individuals whose 2-h plasma glucose concentration did not return to their FPG level after a 75-g oral glucose load were more insulin resistant and had worse CVD outcomes than those whose 2-h plasma glucose returned to the FPG level.
  23 in total

1.  Hyperglycaemia and mortality from all causes and from cardiovascular disease in five populations of Asian origin.

Authors:  T Nakagami
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2004-02-18       Impact factor: 10.122

2.  Low fasting plasma glucose level as a predictor of cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality.

Authors:  M Wei; L W Gibbons; T L Mitchell; J B Kampert; M P Stern; S N Blair
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2000-05-02       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Is the current definition for diabetes relevant to mortality risk from all causes and cardiovascular and noncardiovascular diseases?

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 19.112

4.  Relationships between insulin secretion, insulin action, and fasting plasma glucose concentration in nondiabetic and noninsulin-dependent diabetic subjects.

Authors:  C Bogardus; S Lillioja; B V Howard; G Reaven; D Mott
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 14.808

5.  Two-hour glucose is a better risk predictor for incident coronary heart disease and cardiovascular mortality than fasting glucose.

Authors:  Q Qiao; K Pyörälä; M Pyörälä; A Nissinen; J Lindström; R Tilvis; J Tuomilehto
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 29.983

6.  Diabetes and cardiovascular disease. The Framingham study.

Authors:  W B Kannel; D L McGee
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1979-05-11       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Differences in cardiovascular risk profile based on relationship between post-load plasma glucose and fasting plasma levels.

Authors:  Elena Succurro; Maria Adelaide Marini; Alessandro Grembiale; Marina Lugarà; Francesco Andreozzi; Angela Sciacqua; Marta Letizia Hribal; Renato Lauro; Francesco Perticone; Giorgio Sesti
Journal:  Diabetes Metab Res Rev       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 4.876

8.  Impaired fasting glucose, blood pressure and cardiovascular disease mortality.

Authors:  Patrick Henry; Frédérique Thomas; Athanase Benetos; Louis Guize
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 10.190

9.  Age- and sex-specific prevalences of diabetes and impaired glucose regulation in 13 European cohorts.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 19.112

10.  Fasting hyperglycemia in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: contributions of excessive hepatic glucose production and impaired tissue glucose uptake.

Authors:  R A DeFronzo; E Ferrannini; D C Simonson
Journal:  Metabolism       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 8.694

View more
  37 in total

Review 1.  Impact of postprandial glycaemia on health and prevention of disease.

Authors:  E E Blaak; J-M Antoine; D Benton; I Björck; L Bozzetto; F Brouns; M Diamant; L Dye; T Hulshof; J J Holst; D J Lamport; M Laville; C L Lawton; A Meheust; A Nilson; S Normand; A A Rivellese; S Theis; S S Torekov; S Vinoy
Journal:  Obes Rev       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 9.213

2.  Increased prevalence of cardiac autonomic dysfunction at different degrees of glucose intolerance in the general population: the KORA S4 survey.

Authors:  Dan Ziegler; Andreas Voss; Wolfgang Rathmann; Alexander Strom; Siegfried Perz; Michael Roden; Annette Peters; Christa Meisinger
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2015-02-28       Impact factor: 10.122

Review 3.  Neuropathy in prediabetes: does the clock start ticking early?

Authors:  Nikolaos Papanas; Aaron I Vinik; Dan Ziegler
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 43.330

4.  Should the metabolic syndrome patient with prediabetes be offered pharmacotherapy?

Authors:  Shannon D Sullivan; Robert E Ratner
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.810

5.  Updated Cardiovascular Prevention Guideline of the Brazilian Society of Cardiology - 2019.

Authors:  Dalton Bertolim Précoma; Gláucia Maria Moraes de Oliveira; Antonio Felipe Simão; Oscar Pereira Dutra; Otávio Rizzi Coelho; Maria Cristina de Oliveira Izar; Rui Manuel Dos Santos Póvoa; Isabela de Carlos Back Giuliano; Aristóteles Comte de Alencar Filho; Carlos Alberto Machado; Carlos Scherr; Francisco Antonio Helfenstein Fonseca; Raul Dias Dos Santos Filho; Tales de Carvalho; Álvaro Avezum; Roberto Esporcatte; Bruno Ramos Nascimento; David de Pádua Brasil; Gabriel Porto Soares; Paolo Blanco Villela; Roberto Muniz Ferreira; Wolney de Andrade Martins; Andrei C Sposito; Bruno Halpern; José Francisco Kerr Saraiva; Luiz Sergio Fernandes Carvalho; Marcos Antônio Tambascia; Otávio Rizzi Coelho-Filho; Adriana Bertolami; Harry Correa Filho; Hermes Toros Xavier; José Rocha Faria-Neto; Marcelo Chiara Bertolami; Viviane Zorzanelli Rocha Giraldez; Andrea Araújo Brandão; Audes Diógenes de Magalhães Feitosa; Celso Amodeo; Dilma do Socorro Moraes de Souza; Eduardo Costa Duarte Barbosa; Marcus Vinícius Bolívar Malachias; Weimar Kunz Sebba Barroso de Souza; Fernando Augusto Alves da Costa; Ivan Romero Rivera; Lucia Campos Pellanda; Maria Alayde Mendonça da Silva; Aloyzio Cechella Achutti; André Ribeiro Langowiski; Carla Janice Baister Lantieri; Jaqueline Ribeiro Scholz; Silvia Maria Cury Ismael; José Carlos Aidar Ayoub; Luiz César Nazário Scala; Mario Fritsch Neves; Paulo Cesar Brandão Veiga Jardim; Sandra Cristina Pereira Costa Fuchs; Thiago de Souza Veiga Jardim; Emilio Hideyuki Moriguchi; Jamil Cherem Schneider; Marcelo Heitor Vieira Assad; Sergio Emanuel Kaiser; Ana Maria Lottenberg; Carlos Daniel Magnoni; Marcio Hiroshi Miname; Roberta Soares Lara; Artur Haddad Herdy; Cláudio Gil Soares de Araújo; Mauricio Milani; Miguel Morita Fernandes da Silva; Ricardo Stein; Fernando Antonio Lucchese; Fernando Nobre; Hermilo Borba Griz; Lucélia Batista Neves Cunha Magalhães; Mario Henrique Elesbão de Borba; Mauro Ricardo Nunes Pontes; Ricardo Mourilhe-Rocha
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 2.000

6.  Risk stratification using the CHA2DS2-VASc score in patients with coronary heart disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention; sub-analysis of SHINANO registry.

Authors:  Hirofumi Hioki; Takashi Miura; Yusuke Miyashita; Hirohiko Motoki; Kentaro Shimada; Masanori Kobayashi; Hiroyuki Nakajima; Hikaru Kimura; Eiichiro Mawatari; Hiroshi Akanuma; Toshio Sato; Souichirou Ebisawa; Uichi Ikeda
Journal:  Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc       Date:  2015-02-28

7.  Reducing Glycemic Indicators with Moderate Intensity Stepping of Varied, Short Durations in People with Pre-Diabetes.

Authors:  Eric Bartholomae; Zachary Johnson; Jeffery Moore; Kathryn Ward; Jochen Kressler
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 2.988

Review 8.  Prediabetes and associated disorders.

Authors:  Martin Buysschaert; José Luís Medina; Michael Bergman; Avni Shah; Jaqueline Lonier
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 3.633

9.  Different combinations of glucose tolerance and blood pressure status and incident cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality events.

Authors:  M A Hajebrahimi; S Akbarpour; A Eslami; F Azizi; F Hadaegh
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 3.012

10.  Oral glucose tolerance test and HbA₁c for diagnosis of diabetes in patients undergoing coronary angiography: [corrected] the Silent Diabetes Study.

Authors:  R Doerr; U Hoffmann; W Otter; L Heinemann; W Hunger-Battefeld; B Kulzer; A Klinge; V Lodwig; I Amann-Zalan; D Sturm; D Tschoepe; S G Spitzer; J Stumpf; T Lohmann; O Schnell
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 10.122

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.