Literature DB >> 20424061

Good lamps are the best police: darkness increases dishonesty and self-interested behavior.

Chen-Bo Zhong1, Vanessa K Bohns, Francesca Gino.   

Abstract

Darkness can conceal identity and encourage moral transgressions; it may also induce a psychological feeling of illusory anonymity that disinhibits dishonest and self-interested behavior regardless of actual anonymity. Three experiments provided empirical evidence supporting this prediction. In Experiment 1, participants in a room with slightly dimmed lighting cheated more and thus earned more undeserved money than those in a well-lit room. In Experiment 2, participants wearing sunglasses behaved more selfishly than those wearing clear glasses. Finally, in Experiment 3, an illusory sense of anonymity mediated the relationship between darkness and self-interested behaviors. Across all three experiments, darkness had no bearing on actual anonymity, yet it still increased morally questionable behaviors. We suggest that the experience of darkness, even when subtle, may induce a sense of anonymity that is not proportionate to actual anonymity in a given situation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20424061     DOI: 10.1177/0956797609360754

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  23 in total

1.  Disembodiment: abstract construal attenuates the influence of contextual bodily state in judgment.

Authors:  Sam J Maglio; Yaacov Trope
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2011-07-18

2.  Masks as a moral symbol: Masks reduce wearers' deviant behavior in China during COVID-19.

Authors:  Jackson G Lu; Lesley Luyang Song; Yuhuang Zheng; Laura Changlan Wang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-10-04       Impact factor: 12.779

3.  The effect of the brightness metaphor on memory.

Authors:  Shijia Zhang; Jianhong Zheng; Lei Mo
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2021-10-24

4.  Reduced self-referential neural response during intergroup competition predicts competitor harm.

Authors:  M Cikara; A C Jenkins; N Dufour; R Saxe
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-04-12       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Eavesdropping on Character: Assessing Everyday Moral Behaviors.

Authors:  Kathryn L Bollich; John M Doris; Simine Vazire; Charles L Raison; Joshua J Jackson; Matthias R Mehl
Journal:  J Res Pers       Date:  2016-04

Review 6.  Religion and morality.

Authors:  Ryan McKay; Harvey Whitehouse
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2014-12-22       Impact factor: 17.737

7.  Scientific Challenges to Free Will and Moral Responsibility.

Authors:  Joshua Shepherd
Journal:  Philos Compass       Date:  2015-03-06

8.  Virtual colleagues, virtually colleagues--physicians' use of Twitter: a population-based observational study.

Authors:  Anne Brynolf; Stefan Johansson; Ester Appelgren; Niels Lynoe; Anna-Karin Edstedt Bonamy
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Environmental Aesthetic Value Influences the Intention for Moral Behavior: Changes in Behavioral Moral Judgment.

Authors:  Chenjing Wu; Xianyou He
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 10.  There or not there? A multidisciplinary review and research agenda on the impact of transparent barriers on human perception, action, and social behavior.

Authors:  Gesine Marquardt; Emily S Cross; Alexandra A de Sousa; Eve Edelstein; Alessandro Farnè; Marcin Leszczynski; Miles Patterson; Susanne Quadflieg
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-09-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.