PURPOSE: Aurora kinase A (Aurora-A) is known to regulate genomic instability and tumorigenesis in multiple human cancers. The underlying mechanism, however, is not fully understood. We examined the molecular mechanism of Aurora-A regulation in human ovarian cancer. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Retrovirus-mediated small hairpin RNA (shRNA) was used to silence the expression of Aurora-A in the ovarian cancer cell lines SKOV3, OVCA432, and OVCA433. Immunofluorescence, Western blotting, flow cytometry, cytogenetic analysis, and animal assay were used to test centrosome amplification, cell cycle alteration, apoptosis, DNA damage response, tumor growth, and genomic instability. Immunostaining of BRCA2 and Aurora-A was done in ovarian, pancreatic, breast, and colon cancer samples. RESULTS: Knockdown of Aurora-A reduced centrosome amplification, malformation of mitotic spindles, and chromosome aberration, leading to decreased tumor growth. Silencing Aurora-A attenuated cell cycle progression and enhanced apoptosis and DNA damage response by restoring p21, pRb, and BRCA2 expression. Aurora-A was inversely correlated with BRCA2 in high-grade ovarian serous carcinoma, breast cancer, and pancreatic cancer. In high-grade ovarian serous carcinoma, positive expression of BRCA2 predicted increased overall and disease-free survival, whereas positive expression of Aurora-A predicted poor overall and disease-free survival (P < 0.05). Moreover, an increased Aurora-A to BRCA2 expression ratio predicted poor overall survival (P = 0.047) compared with a decreased Aurora-A to BRCA2 expression ratio. CONCLUSION: Aurora-A regulates genomic instability and tumorigenesis through cell cycle dysregulation and BRCA2 suppression. The negative correlation between Aurora-A and BRCA2 exists in multiple cancers, whereas the expression ratio of Aurora-A to BRCA2 predicts ovarian cancer patient outcome. (c) 2010 AACR.
PURPOSE:Aurora kinase A (Aurora-A) is known to regulate genomic instability and tumorigenesis in multiple humancancers. The underlying mechanism, however, is not fully understood. We examined the molecular mechanism of Aurora-A regulation in humanovarian cancer. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Retrovirus-mediated small hairpin RNA (shRNA) was used to silence the expression of Aurora-A in the ovarian cancer cell lines SKOV3, OVCA432, and OVCA433. Immunofluorescence, Western blotting, flow cytometry, cytogenetic analysis, and animal assay were used to test centrosome amplification, cell cycle alteration, apoptosis, DNA damage response, tumor growth, and genomic instability. Immunostaining of BRCA2 and Aurora-A was done in ovarian, pancreatic, breast, and colon cancer samples. RESULTS: Knockdown of Aurora-A reduced centrosome amplification, malformation of mitotic spindles, and chromosome aberration, leading to decreased tumor growth. Silencing Aurora-A attenuated cell cycle progression and enhanced apoptosis and DNA damage response by restoring p21, pRb, and BRCA2 expression. Aurora-A was inversely correlated with BRCA2 in high-grade ovarian serous carcinoma, breast cancer, and pancreatic cancer. In high-grade ovarian serous carcinoma, positive expression of BRCA2 predicted increased overall and disease-free survival, whereas positive expression of Aurora-A predicted poor overall and disease-free survival (P < 0.05). Moreover, an increased Aurora-A to BRCA2 expression ratio predicted poor overall survival (P = 0.047) compared with a decreased Aurora-A to BRCA2 expression ratio. CONCLUSION:Aurora-A regulates genomic instability and tumorigenesis through cell cycle dysregulation and BRCA2 suppression. The negative correlation between Aurora-A and BRCA2 exists in multiple cancers, whereas the expression ratio of Aurora-A to BRCA2 predicts ovarian cancerpatient outcome. (c) 2010 AACR.
Authors: Gong Yang; Daniel G Rosen; Zhihong Zhang; Robert C Bast; Gordon B Mills; Justin A Colacino; Imelda Mercado-Uribe; Jinsong Liu Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2006-10-23 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Gong Yang; Daniel G Rosen; Imelda Mercado-Uribe; Justin A Colacino; Gordon B Mills; Robert C Bast; Chenyi Zhou; Jinsong Liu Journal: Carcinogenesis Date: 2006-07-08 Impact factor: 4.944
Authors: Jian-Hua Mao; Di Wu; Jesus Perez-Losada; Tao Jiang; Qian Li; Richard M Neve; Joe W Gray; Wei-Wen Cai; Allan Balmain Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2007-02 Impact factor: 31.743
Authors: Stephan Ryser; Eva Dizin; Charles Edward Jefford; Bénédicte Delaval; Sarantis Gagos; Agni Christodoulidou; Karl-Heinz Krause; Daniel Birnbaum; Irmgard Irminger-Finger Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2009-01-27 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Gong Yang; Imelda Mercado-Uribe; Asha S Multani; Subrata Sen; Ie-Ming Shih; Kwong-Kwok Wong; David M Gershenson; Jinsong Liu Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2013-02-12 Impact factor: 7.396