| Literature DB >> 20423480 |
Karin E Isaksson Ro1, Reidar Tyssen, Asle Hoffart, Harold Sexton, Olaf G Aasland, Tore Gude.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Knowledge about important factors in reduction of burnout is needed, but there is a dearth of burnout intervention program studies and their effects among physicians. The present three-year follow-up study aimed to investigate the roles of coping strategies, job stress and personality traits in burnout reduction after a counselling intervention for distressed physicians.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20423480 PMCID: PMC2880293 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-213
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Public Health ISSN: 1471-2458 Impact factor: 3.295
Figure 1Flow chart over participation in the study.
Figure 2Cross-lagged and synchronous/co-temporal panel models.
Description of physicians at baseline and at three-year follow-up after a counselling intervention.
| Baseline | Three-year | Level of significance | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean (SD) or | Mean (SD) or | McNemar's test | |
| 46.8 (8.9) | |||
| 83 (45%)/101 (55%) | |||
| 152 | 135 | p = 0.007** | |
| 90/184 | 74/171 | p = 0.02* | |
| Internal medicine | 27 | 34 | p = 0.02* |
| Surgery | 30 | 34 | p = 0.22 |
| Psychiatry | 16 | 17 | p = 1.00 |
| General practice | 45 | 50 | p = 0.18 |
| Social and laboratory med. | 16 | 19 | p = 0.25 |
| Non-specialist | 50 | 18 | p < 0.001*** |
| Missing | 12 | ||
| 60 | 10 | p < 0.001*** | |
| 3.0 (0.9) | 2.4 (0.8) | t = 7.6 p < 0.001*** | |
| 2.4 (0.7) | 1.9 (0.6) | t = 8.2 | |
| 2.9 (0.8) | 2.5 (0.8) | t = 7.0 | |
| 2.6 (1.8) | 2.0 (1.8) | t = 5.0 | |
| 4.4 (7.9) | 3.2 (9.8) | z = -3.1 p = 0.002** | |
| 43.2 (8.5) | 39.6 (11.2) | z = -3.7 p < 0.001*** | |
*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001
Figure 3Levels of emotional exhaustion, job stress, coping and neuroticism. Repeated measures ANOVA for time (baseline, 1 yr, 3 yr) with contrasts for baseline-1 yr and 1 yr-3 yr. a. Overall ANOVA F(1.8, 267.0†) = 33.1*** n = 147. Baseline-1 yr F(1,146) = 39.3 ***. 1 yr-3 yr F(1,146) = 3.0. b. Overall ANOVA F(2,314) = 43.4*** n = 158. Baseline-1 yr F(1,157) = 66.6***. 1 yr-3 yr F(1,157) = 0.4. c. Overall ANOVA F(2,322) = 2.5 n = 162. d. Overall ANOVA F(2,320) = 24.5*** n = 161. Baseline-1 yr F(1,160) = 27.4***. 1 yr-3 yr F(1,160) = 1.9. e. Overall ANOVA F(2,322) = 10.1*** n = 162. Baseline-1 yr F(1,161) = 3.6. 1 yr-3 yr F(1,161) = 6.7**. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. † - degrees of freedom corrected with Greenhouse-Geisser estimates, since Mauchly's test showed a violation of the assumption of sphericity.
Synchronous/co-temporal panel models of emotional exhaustion in relation to job stress (total and sub-scales), coping and neuroticism at one- and three-years follow-up
| Synchronous Paths† | Baseline/1 year | Baseline/3 year | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JS → EE | 2.33 | 0.44/0.19 | 2.29** | 6.63 | 0.72/0.23 | 3.16** |
| EE → JS | 0.24/0.12 | 1.68 | 0.12/0.15 | 0.78 | ||
| JS-Em → EE | 0.68 | 0.36/0.16 | 2.32** | 0.85 | 0.35/0.23 | 1.51 |
| EE → JS-Em | 0.10/0.11 | 0.91 | 0.13/0.12 | 1.05 | ||
| JS-So → EE | 3.67 | 0.43/0.14 | 3.12** | 20.08 | 0.57/0.15 | 3.74*** |
| EE → JS-So | 0.15/0.19 | 0.76 | 0.16/0.20 | 0.78 | ||
| JS-Fl → EE | 0.25 | 0.10/0.16 | 0.65 | 0.14 | 0.49/0.19 | 2.62** |
| EE → JS-Fl | 0.20/0.09 | 2.14** | 0.05/0.12 | 0.43 | ||
| AC → EE | 2.43 | -0.24/0.15 | -1.63 | 0.50 | -0.57/0.17 | -3.32** |
| EE → AC | 0.01/0.10 | 0.08 | 0.24/0.13 | 1.84 | ||
| EC → EE | 0.12 | 0.41/0.10 | 4.15*** | 1.19 | 0.48/0.12 | 4.05 *** |
| EE → EC | 0.12/0.12 | 1.03 | 0.14/0.12 | 1.18 | ||
| N → EE | 4.19 | 0.09/0.06 | 1.50 | 0.98 | 0.09/0.07 | 1.38 |
| EE → N | 0.74/0.26 | 2.83** | 0.70/0.23 | 3.11** | ||
JS - Job Stress, EE - Emotional Exhaustion, JS-Em - Job Stress-Emotional dimension,
JS-So - Job Stress-Social dimension, JS-Fl - Job Stress-dimension of Fear of litigation.
AC - Active Coping, EC - Emotion-focused Coping, N - Neuroticism
†Confirmatory fit index range 0.93-1.00, Standardized root mean square residual 0.01-0.07
‡Critical ratio = parameter/standard error (distributed as z)
*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001