Literature DB >> 20423403

Trust in Nurses Scale: construct validity and internal reliability evaluation.

Laurel E Radwin1, Howard J Cabral.   

Abstract

AIM: This paper is a report of the continued psychometric evaluation of the Trust in Nurses Scale.
BACKGROUND: Qualitative analyses indicate that trust in nurses is critically important to adult patients. Instruments that distinctively measure this concept are lacking. A middle-range theory of patient-centred nursing care provided the theoretical basis for the Trust in Nurses Scale. Content validity was assessed by an expert panel and patient interviews. Construct validity and reliability were found acceptable using multi-trait/multi-item analysis techniques. These findings were previously reported.
METHODS: Construct validity and reliability of the Trust in Nurses Scale was assessed in 2007 using data collected during 2004-2005 from 187 hospitalized patients in a haematology-oncology setting. Trust in nurses (the latent factor) was operationalized by five items (manifest variables) using confirmatory factor analyses. Fit statistics included comparative fit index, Tucker-Lewis Index, root mean square error of approximation and the standardized root mean square residual. Internal consistency reliability was assessed using coefficient alpha.
FINDINGS: Both a five-item and a four-item version demonstrate acceptable psychometric properties. The five-item version met three fit statistics criteria. Fifty-nine per cent of the variance was explained. A four-item version met all fit statistics criteria. Sixty-six per cent of the variance was explained. Acceptable internal consistency reliability was found for both versions.
CONCLUSION: Previous psychometric testing of the Trust in Nurses Scale provided evidence of the instrument's reliability, content validity and construct validity. The presented analyses further support construct validity. Thus, cumulative findings indicate that the instrument measures with a few items the underlying concept of trust.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20423403     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2009.05168.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Adv Nurs        ISSN: 0309-2402            Impact factor:   3.187


  5 in total

1.  Development and validation of the functional assessment of chronic illness therapy treatment satisfaction (FACIT TS) measures.

Authors:  John D Peipert; Jennifer L Beaumont; Rita Bode; Dave Cella; Sofia F Garcia; Elizabeth A Hahn
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  POPPIE: protocol for a randomised controlled pilot trial of continuity of midwifery care for women at increased risk of preterm birth.

Authors:  C Fernandez Turienzo; D Bick; M Bollard; L Brigante; A Briley; K Coxon; P Cross; A Healey; M Mehta; A Melaugh; J Moulla; P T Seed; A H Shennan; C Singh; R M Tribe; J Sandall
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 2.279

3.  Hospital service quality based on HEALTHQUAL model and trusting nurses at Iranian university and non-university hospitals: a comparative study.

Authors:  Reza Nemati; Masoud Bahreini; Shahnaz Pouladi; Kamran Mirzaei; Farkhondeh Mehboodi
Journal:  BMC Nurs       Date:  2020-12-10

4.  The relationship between the level of trust in nurses and nursing care quality perceptions of patients treated for Covid-19.

Authors:  Simge Çoşkun Palaz; Semra Kayacan
Journal:  Scand J Caring Sci       Date:  2022-08-09

5.  Validation of Chinese version of the 4-item Trust in Nurses Scale in patients with cancer.

Authors:  Ling Zhao; Rong Wang; Shan Liu; Jin Yan
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 2.711

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.