Literature DB >> 20421783

Silver in situ hybridization (SISH) for determination of HER2 gene status in breast carcinoma: comparison with FISH and assessment of interobserver reproducibility.

Bettina G Papouchado1, Jonathan Myles, Ricardo V Lloyd, Mark Stoler, Andre M Oliveira, Erinn Downs-Kelly, Adrienne Morey, Michael Bilous, Ray Nagle, Nichole Prescott, Lin Wang, Lidija Dragovich, Abigail McElhinny, Carole Ferrell Garcia, Jim Ranger-Moore, Heather Free, William Powell, Margaret Loftus, James Pettay, Fabien Gaire, Christopher Roberts, Manfred Dietel, Patrick Roche, Thomas Grogan, Raymond Tubbs.   

Abstract

The importance of HER2 status in breast cancer management has focused attention on the ability of clinical assays to correctly assign HER2 amplification status. There is no consensus as to the best method for assessing HER2 status. Disadvantages of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) testing include longer time required for staining and scoring slides, requirements for specialized training and fluorescence microscopy, and loss of the signal due to quenching of the fluorescent dye. Silver-enhanced in situ hybridization (SISH) is a rapid fully automated assay providing permanently stained slides that are interpreted by conventional bright field microscopy which enables pathologists to evaluate slides within the context of tissue morphology. This study evaluates the concordance between SISH and FISH assays in determining the status of HER2 gene amplification in a cohort of 298 primary invasive breast carcinomas. Furthermore, we assessed in detail the variables contributing to interobserver interpretive reproducibility of HER2 SISH among 10 pathologists. HER2 was quantified using the ratio of HER2 to CHR17 signals using the conventional historical interpretation scale and also by the American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists reporting scheme. For SISH status determined by consensus among 10 pathologists, overall concordance between SISH and FISH was identified in 288 of 298 cases (96.6%) using the conventional Food and Drug Administration approved criteria. Overall agreement was observed in 282 of 285 cases (98.9%) using the American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists result reporting scheme (with equivocal cases removed). In conclusion, SISH represents a novel approach for the determination of HER2 status in breast cancer. The overall concordance between SISH and FISH is excellent, and the interpretation of SISH results by pathologists is most reproducible using the HER2/CHR17 ratio.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20421783     DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e3181d96231

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol        ISSN: 0147-5185            Impact factor:   6.394


  16 in total

1.  Application of the 2013 ASCO/CAP guideline and the SISH technique for HER2 testing of breast cancer selects more patients for anti-HER2 treatment.

Authors:  António Polónia; Dina Leitão; Fernando Schmitt
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 4.064

2.  Distinct expression profile of key molecules in crawling-type early gastric carcinoma.

Authors:  Ha Young Woo; Yoon Sung Bae; Jie-Hyun Kim; Sang Kil Lee; Yong Chan Lee; Jae-Ho Cheong; Sung Hoon Noh; Hyunki Kim
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 7.370

3.  Thymidylate synthase protein expression by IHC and gene copy number by SISH correlate and show great variability in non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Murry W Wynes; Krzysztof Konopa; Shalini Singh; Bernadette Reyna-Asuncion; James Ranger-Moore; Adam Sternau; Daniel C Christoph; Rafal Dziadziuszko; Jacek Jassem; Fred R Hirsch
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 15.609

Review 4.  HER2 expression beyond breast cancer: therapeutic implications for gynecologic malignancies.

Authors:  Diana P English; Dana M Roque; Alessandro D Santin
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 4.074

5.  Determining sensitivity and specificity of HER2 testing in breast cancer using a tissue micro-array approach.

Authors:  Tim J A Dekker; Susan Ter Borg; Gerrit K J Hooijer; Sybren L Meijer; Jelle Wesseling; James E Boers; Ed Schuuring; Jos Bart; Joost van Gorp; Wilma E Mesker; Judith R Kroep; Vincent T H B M Smit; Marc J van de Vijver
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 6.466

6.  MET in gastric carcinomas: comparison between protein expression and gene copy number and impact on clinical outcome.

Authors:  H E Lee; M A Kim; H S Lee; E-J Jung; H-K Yang; B L Lee; Y-J Bang; W H Kim
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  Testing for HER2 in Breast Cancer: A Continuing Evolution.

Authors:  Sejal Shah; Beiyun Chen
Journal:  Patholog Res Int       Date:  2010-12-06

8.  Immunohistochemical and molecular analyses of HER2 status in breast cancers are highly concordant and complementary approaches.

Authors:  J Lehmann-Che; F Amira-Bouhidel; E Turpin; M Antoine; H Soliman; L Legres; C Bocquet; R Bernoud; E Flandre; M Varna; A de Roquancourt; L-F Plassa; S Giacchetti; M Espié; C de Bazelaire; L Cahen-Doidy; E Bourstyn; A Janin; H de Thé; P Bertheau
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2011-05-03       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Hybridization for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in gastric carcinoma: a comparison of fluorescence in-situ hybridization with a novel fully automated dual-colour silver in-situ hybridization method.

Authors:  Elena García-García; Carlos Gómez-Martín; Bárbara Angulo; Esther Conde; Ana Suárez-Gauthier; Magdalena Adrados; Cristian Perna; José Luis Rodríguez-Peralto; Manuel Hidalgo; Fernando López-Ríos
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 5.087

10.  Recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists clinical practice guideline update.

Authors:  Antonio C Wolff; M Elizabeth H Hammond; David G Hicks; Mitch Dowsett; Lisa M McShane; Kimberly H Allison; Donald C Allred; John M S Bartlett; Michael Bilous; Patrick Fitzgibbons; Wedad Hanna; Robert B Jenkins; Pamela B Mangu; Soonmyung Paik; Edith A Perez; Michael F Press; Patricia A Spears; Gail H Vance; Giuseppe Viale; Daniel F Hayes
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 5.534

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.