Literature DB >> 20421559

Barriers to routine risk-score use for healthy primary care patients: survey and qualitative study.

Falk Müller-Riemenschneider1, Christine Holmberg, Nina Rieckmann, Harald Kliems, Veronika Rufer, Jacqueline Müller-Nordhorn, Stefan N Willich.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Risk scores for the primary prevention of chronic diseases in healthy adults are frequently recommended but often underused by general practitioners (GPs). The objectives of this study were to assess the use of and attitudes regarding the use of risk scores among GPs and to identify possible barriers to use.
METHODS: Between November 7, 2007, and April 4, 2008, 68 GPs in Berlin, Germany, participated in the survey, and 24 were additionally invited to participate in focus groups. Quantitative data were analyzed descriptively and qualitative data were analyzed according to grounded theory.
RESULTS: Survey data of 42 GPs indicated that physicians regularly perform risk assessments for healthy patients, although most did not use risk scores. The usefulness of risk scores was rated largely positive. Focus groups revealed some confusion about the definition of risk scores and that participants resisted general use. Barriers to risk-score use were lack of lifestyle recommendations, regulatory constraints, the patient's role, and lack of accuracy. Suggestions for improvement included computerized risk prediction for multiple diseases simultaneously, better computer-generated visual presentation, and the integration of lifestyle recommendations.
CONCLUSIONS: The GPs perceive the routine use of risk scores as infeasible because of regulatory constraints and the nature of the physician-patient relationship. These factors need to be considered to increase risk-score use. Training of physicians could also help somewhat to overcome underuse. Use of computerized approaches that enable the prediction of risks for several chronic diseases simultaneously and improved computer-generated visual presentation may increase acceptance. Risk profiles should further be related to recommendations for health-behavior modification.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20421559     DOI: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.66

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-9926


  28 in total

1.  Risk prediction of major complications in individuals with diabetes: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study.

Authors:  C M Parrinello; K Matsushita; M Woodward; L E Wagenknecht; J Coresh; E Selvin
Journal:  Diabetes Obes Metab       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 6.577

2.  SI RLTD: Risk Scores and Decision Making: The Anatomy of a Decision to Reduce Breast Cancer Risk.

Authors:  Christine Holmberg; Mary Daly; Worta McCaskill-Stevens
Journal:  J Nurs Healthc Chronic Illn       Date:  2010-12

3.  Cardiovascular risk scores: qualitative study of how primary care practitioners understand and use them.

Authors:  Su May Liew; Claire Blacklock; Jenny Hislop; Paul Glasziou; David Mant
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  A survey of French general practitioners and a qualitative study on their use and assessment of predictive clinical scores.

Authors:  Marianne Sarazin; Solange Gonzalez Chiappe; Marie Kasprzyk; Patrick Mismetti; Andréa Lasserre
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2013-06-25

Review 5.  Developing risk prediction models for type 2 diabetes: a systematic review of methodology and reporting.

Authors:  Gary S Collins; Susan Mallett; Omar Omar; Ly-Mee Yu
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2011-09-08       Impact factor: 8.775

6.  Cardiovascular disease risk factor patterns and their implications for intervention strategies in Vietnam.

Authors:  Quang Ngoc Nguyen; Son Thai Pham; Loi Doan Do; Viet Lan Nguyen; Stig Wall; Lars Weinehall; Ruth Bonita; Peter Byass
Journal:  Int J Hypertens       Date:  2012-03-04       Impact factor: 2.420

7.  Hip fracture in the elderly: a re-analysis of the EPIDOS study with causal Bayesian networks.

Authors:  Pascal Caillet; Sarah Klemm; Michel Ducher; Alexandre Aussem; Anne-Marie Schott
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-30       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  A clinical diabetes risk prediction model for prediabetic women with prior gestational diabetes.

Authors:  Bernice Man; Alan Schwartz; Oksana Pugach; Yinglin Xia; Ben Gerber
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Predicting macro- and microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes: the Japan Diabetes Complications Study/the Japanese Elderly Diabetes Intervention Trial risk engine.

Authors:  Shiro Tanaka; Sachiko Tanaka; Satoshi Iimuro; Hidetoshi Yamashita; Shigehiro Katayama; Yasuo Akanuma; Nobuhiro Yamada; Atsushi Araki; Hideki Ito; Hirohito Sone; Yasuo Ohashi
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 19.112

10.  Repeated measurement of the intermountain risk score enhances prognostication for mortality.

Authors:  Benjamin D Horne; Donald L Lappé; Joseph B Muhlestein; Heidi T May; Brianna S Ronnow; Kimberly D Brunisholz; Abdallah G Kfoury; T Jared Bunch; Rami Alharethi; Deborah Budge; Brian K Whisenant; Tami L Bair; Kurt R Jensen; Jeffrey L Anderson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.