Literature DB >> 20421310

An evaluation of measured and calculated serum free cortisol in a group of patients with known adrenal suppression.

Nicola L Barlow1, Jayne Holme, Robert A Stockley, Penelope M Clark.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Since more than 90% of cortisol is bound to protein, serum free cortisol (SFC) may be a more appropriate marker of adrenal status than total cortisol. However, measurement of SFC is technically difficult and calculated SFC may offer a more practical alternative.
METHODS: SFC, measured by equilibrium dialysis coupled with immunoassay, and calculated using Coolens' equation from total cortisol and corticosteroid binding globulin (CBG) concentrations, was compared in short Synacthen test (SST) serum from 42 patients, of whom 20 demonstrated a suppressed adrenal response.
RESULTS: Considering the patient group as a whole, calculated SFC was found to be significantly lower than measured SFC, pre- and post-Synacthen (P < 0.05 and <0.001, respectively). Upon classifying the patients as pass or fail based on total cortisol response to Synacthen, the difference in calculated and measured SFC only reached statistical significance for post-Synacthen concentrations in the pass group (P < 0.01), suggesting a greater discrepancy at higher cortisol concentrations. There was no difference in CBG levels between the pass and fail groups and both measured and calculated SFC gave a diminished 30 min response in subjects deemed to have failed the SST.
CONCLUSION: Coolens' equation was found to underestimate measured SFC in this cohort of outpatients, as has been previously demonstrated, particularly in patients with a pronounced acute phase response. Although calculated SFC gave a diminished response in individuals deemed to have failed the SST, the concentration-dependent nature of the discrepancy may limit the usefulness of this method for assessing adrenal status.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20421310     DOI: 10.1258/acb.2010.009246

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Clin Biochem        ISSN: 0004-5632            Impact factor:   2.057


  3 in total

1.  Comparison of salivary and calculated free cortisol levels during low and standard dose of ACTH stimulation tests in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Gulsah Elbuken; Fatih Tanriverdi; Zuleyha Karaca; Mustafa Kula; Selma Gokahmetoglu; Kursad Unluhizarci; Fahrettin Kelestimur
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 3.633

2.  Plasma, salivary and urinary cortisol levels following physiological and stress doses of hydrocortisone in normal volunteers.

Authors:  Caroline Jung; Santo Greco; Hanh H T Nguyen; Jui T Ho; John G Lewis; David J Torpy; Warrick J Inder
Journal:  BMC Endocr Disord       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 2.763

3.  PK/PD modeling of 5-hydroxytryptophan (5-HTP) challenge test with cortisol measurement in serum and saliva.

Authors:  Zheng Guan; Gabriel Jacobs; Hans van Pelt; Joop M A Van Gerven; Jacobus Burggraaf; Wei Zhao
Journal:  Pharmacol Res Perspect       Date:  2020-04
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.