Literature DB >> 20421158

Is adjuvant chemoradiotherapy overtreatment in cervical cancer patients with intermediate risk factors?

Sang-Young Ryu1, Sang-Il Park, Byung-Ho Nam, Chul-Koo Cho, Kidong Kim, Beob-Jong Kim, Moon-Hong Kim, Seok-Cheol Choi, Eui-Don Lee, Kyoung-Hee Lee.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine whether adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) improves the outcome of cervical cancer patients with intermediate risk factors. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between January 2000 and June 2006, the medical records of 735 patients who had undergone radical surgery for Stage IB-IIA cervical cancer were reviewed retrospectively. Of the 735 patients, 172 with two or more intermediate risk factors (i.e., lymphovascular space involvement, deep stromal invasion, and tumor size≥2 cm) were grouped as follows according to the adjuvant treatment received: 34 patients, no further treatment; 49 patients, RT; and 89 patients, CRT. The significance of the clinical parameters and recurrence-free survival of each group were analyzed.
RESULTS: Of the 172 patients with any of the intermediate risk factors, 137 (79.6%) had two or more intermediate risk factors. Of the 172 patients, 12 developed recurrences (6.4%)->(7.0%), with 6 in the pelvis and 6 in distant sites. All 12 recurrences occurred in those who had two or more intermediate risk factors (sensitivity, 100%); however, only six recurrences were detected in patients who met the Gynecologic Oncology Group criteria for the intermediate-risk group (sensitivity, 50%; Z test, p<.05). A statistically significant difference was found in the 3-year recurrence-free survival rate among the no further treatment, RT, and CRT groups (67.5%, 90.5%, and 97.5%, respectively; p<.05). The incidence of Grade 3-4 hematologic and gastrointestinal toxicities was not significantly different statistically between the RT and CRT groups (6.1% and 13.4%, respectively; p > .05).
CONCLUSION: Postoperative adjuvant CRT can improve the outcome of cervical cancer patients with intermediate risk factors, with low increase in toxicity.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20421158     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.11.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  17 in total

1.  Patterns of care in patients with cervical cancer 2012: results of a survey among German radiotherapy departments and out-patient health care centers.

Authors:  S Marnitz; C Köhler; A Rauer; A Schneider; V Budach; A Tsunoda; M Mangler
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2013-07-27       Impact factor: 3.621

2.  Long-term outcomes of postoperative taxane/platinum chemotherapy for early stage cervical cancer: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Mika Okazawa-Sakai; Takanori Yokoyama; Etsuko Fujimoto; Shinichi Okame; Yuko Shiroyama; Takashi Yokoyama; Kazuhiro Takehara
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Aspects of Therapy for Cervical Cancer in Germany 2012 - Results from a Survey of German Gynaecological Hospitals.

Authors:  M Mangler; N Zech; A Schneider; C Köhler; S Marnitz
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 2.915

Review 4.  Surgical treatment of "intermediate risk" lymph node negative cervical cancer patients without adjuvant radiotherapy-A retrospective cohort study and review of the literature.

Authors:  David Cibula; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum; Daniela Fischerova; Selvan Pather; Katie Lavigne; Jiri Slama; Kaled Alektiar; Lin Ming-Yin; Roman Kocian; Anna Germanova; Filip Frühauf; Lukas Dostalek; Ladislav Dusek; Kailash Narayan
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2018-10-20       Impact factor: 5.482

5.  Prognostic evaluation of postoperative adjuvant therapy for operable cervical cancer: 10 years' experience of National Cancer Center in China.

Authors:  Tong Shu; Dan Zhao; Bin Li; Yating Wang; Shuanghuan Liu; Pingping Li; Jing Zuo; Ping Bai; Rong Zhang; Lingying Wu
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 5.087

6.  Randomized phase III trial of radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy with topotecan and cisplatin in intermediate-risk cervical cancer patients after radical hysterectomy.

Authors:  Wenze Sun; Tao Wang; Fan Shi; Jiquan Wang; Juan Wang; Beina Hui; Yingbing Zhang; Jinli Lu; Hongwei Chen; Zi Liu
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 4.430

7.  Intermediate-risk grouping of cervical cancer patients treated with radical hysterectomy: a Korean Gynecologic Oncology Group study.

Authors:  S Y Ryu; M H Kim; B H Nam; T S Lee; E S Song; C Y Park; J W Kim; Y B Kim; H S Ryu; S Y Park; K T Kim; C H Cho; C Lee; S M Kim; B G Kim; D S Bae; Y T Kim; J-H Nam
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  High-Grade Tumor Budding Stratifies Early-Stage Cervical Cancer with Recurrence Risk.

Authors:  Bangxing Huang; Jing Cai; Xia Xu; Shuang Guo; Zehua Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Comparison of chemoradiotherapy with and without brachytherapy as adjuvant therapy after radical surgery in early-stage cervical cancer with poor prognostic factors: An observational study.

Authors:  Mei-Ling Lan; Xian Yu; He Xiao; Peng Zhou; Nan Hu; Yun Liu; Ge Wang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 1.889

10.  Intensity-modulated radiation therapy versus three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy with concurrent nedaplatin-based chemotherapy after radical hysterectomy for uterine cervical cancer: comparison of outcomes, complications, and dose-volume histogram parameters.

Authors:  Fumiaki Isohashi; Seiji Mabuchi; Yasuo Yoshioka; Yuji Seo; Osamu Suzuki; Keisuke Tamari; Michiko Yamashita; Hikari Unno; Yasuto Kinose; Katsumi Kozasa; Iori Sumida; Yuki Otani; Tadashi Kimura; Kazuhiko Ogawa
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 3.481

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.