Literature DB >> 20421033

Management of acute appendicitis: the impact of CT scanning on the bottom line.

Cedric V Pritchett1, Nick C Levinsky, Yoonhee P Ha, Allard E Dembe, Steven M Steinberg.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Acute appendicitis continues to be a common general surgical problem. Little is known about whether the contribution to margin has been affected by changes in technology. STUDY
DESIGN: Patients undergoing appendectomy for acute appendicitis from June 2005 to May 2007 were evaluated for demographics, diagnostic and treatment alternatives, and outcomes. Financial outcomes were assessed. Efficiency, including admission to emergency department bed to incision (bed to knife time [BTK]), operative length, and hospital length of stay (LOS) were assessed.
RESULTS: During the 2 years of the study, there were no differences in demographics, insurance status, case length, diagnostic accuracy, pathology, LOS, or outcomes. Both laparoscopy and CT use increased between the 2 study years (odds ratio [OR]: 1.68, p = 0.06; 95% CI, 0.98-2.89 and OR: 1.83, p = 0.06, CI, 0.98-3.45, respectively). Mean BTK time increased by about 1 hour: 465 minutes versus 521 minutes (p = 0.032; 95% CI, 0.08-1.78) in univariate analysis. However, multivariate analysis demonstrated no difference in BTK time between years (p = 0.136). After controlling for gender, year of operation, and insurance status, obtaining a CT study added 3.5 hours to BTK time (p < 0.001; 95% CI, 2.41-4.45). Women had BTK times 55 minutes longer than men when controlling for similar covariates (p = 0.027; 95% CI, 0.11-1.74). Laparoscopy contributed to shorter mean LOS (-0.78 days, p = 0.04), and gangrenous appendicitis (1.80 days, p < 0.001) and complications (4.23 days, p < 0.001) increased LOS. Mean contribution to margin decreased from $6,347 to $4,295 (p = 0.068).
CONCLUSIONS: Increasing use of CT scanning in acute appendicitis increases cost of care, decreases contribution to margin, prolongs patient's stay in the emergency department, and delays time to operation. Copyright 2010 American College of Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20421033     DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.12.043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  11 in total

1.  Effect of surgeon's judgement on the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.

Authors:  Mustafa Hasbahçeci; Cengiz Erol; Mustafa Törü; Mehmet Şeker
Journal:  Ulus Cerrahi Derg       Date:  2014-03-01

2.  Increasing the Value of Healthcare: Improving Mortality While Reducing Cost in Bariatric Surgery.

Authors:  Ryan C Broderick; Hans F Fuchs; Cristina R Harnsberger; David C Chang; Bryan J Sandler; Garth R Jacobsen; Santiago Horgan
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 4.129

3.  Acute appendicitis: prospective evaluation of a diagnostic algorithm integrating ultrasound and low-dose CT to reduce the need of standard CT.

Authors:  Pierre-Alexandre Poletti; Alexandra Platon; Thomas De Perrot; Francois Sarasin; Elisabeth Andereggen; Olivier Rutschmann; Elise Dupuis-Lozeron; Thomas Perneger; Pascal Gervaz; Christoph D Becker
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-07-30       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  The value of hyperbilirubinaemia in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.

Authors:  Andrew Emmanuel; Peter Murchan; Ian Wilson; Paul Balfe
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 1.891

5.  Impact of routine contrast-enhanced CT on costs and use of hospital resources in patients with acute abdomen. Results of a randomised clinical trial.

Authors:  Tiina Lehtimäki; Petri Juvonen; Hannu Valtonen; Pekka Miettinen; Hannu Paajanen; Ritva Vanninen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Comparison of Imaging Strategies with Conditional versus Immediate Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography in Patients with Clinical Suspicion of Acute Appendicitis.

Authors:  J J Atema; S L Gans; A Van Randen; W Laméris; H W van Es; J P M van Heesewijk; B van Ramshorst; W H Bouma; W Ten Hove; E M van Keulen; M G W Dijkgraaf; P M M Bossuyt; J Stoker; M A Boermeester
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 7.  Laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis: How to discourage surgeons using inadequate therapy.

Authors:  Tomohide Hori; Takafumi Machimoto; Yoshio Kadokawa; Toshiyuki Hata; Tatsuo Ito; Shigeru Kato; Daiki Yasukawa; Yuki Aisu; Yusuke Kimura; Maho Sasaki; Yuichi Takamatsu; Taku Kitano; Shigeo Hisamori; Tsunehiro Yoshimura
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-08-28       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Performance of imaging studies in patients with suspected appendicitis after stratification with adult appendicitis score.

Authors:  Henna E Sammalkorpi; Ari Leppäniemi; Eila Lantto; Panu Mentula
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  A Prospective Study on the Diagnostic Value of Hyperbilirubinemia as a Predictive Factor for Appendicular Perforation in Acute Appendicitis.

Authors:  Thangadurai Ramasamy Ramu; Sakthivel Chinnakkulam Kandhasamy; Anandi Andappan; Bavani Sankar T
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2018-08-27

10.  Hyperbilirubinemia is a significant indicator for the severity of acute appendicitis.

Authors:  Young Ran Hong; Chul-Woon Chung; Jong Woo Kim; Chang Il Kwon; Dae Ho Ahn; Sung Won Kwon; Seong Ki Kim
Journal:  J Korean Soc Coloproctol       Date:  2012-10-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.