Literature DB >> 20420724

Comparison between automatic tube compensation and continuous positive airway pressure during spontaneous breathing trials.

Juan B Figueroa-Casas1, Ricardo Montoya, Alejandro Arzabala, Sean M Connery.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Various methods to perform spontaneous breathing trials (SBTs) exist, but no one method has been shown to be superior. Automatic tube compensation (ATC) is a new and potentially advantageous ventilation mode to use during SBT. We compared ATC to continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) during SBTs, to determine their efficacy in identifying patients ready to be liberated from mechanical ventilation.
METHODS: We randomized 118 adults in a general intensive care unit on mechanical ventilation for > or = 24 h who were about to undergo an SBT as part of an established respiratory-therapist-driven weaning protocol to undergo 30 min SBT with ATC or CPAP with no pressure support. We predefined the SBT-failure criteria. The primary outcome was duration of weaning (days from first SBT to extubation). Other outcomes included unsuccessful extubation within 48 h, first-SBT-pass rate, and total duration of mechanical ventilation.
RESULTS: We found a trend toward less failure of first SBT with ATC, compared to CPAP (3% vs 13% respectively, P = .09), but no difference in duration of weaning, rate of unsuccessful extubation, or duration of mechanical ventilation.
CONCLUSIONS: When applied as part of a respiratory-therapist-driven weaning protocol in a general intensive-care population, SBTs with ATC were safe but did not hasten liberation from mechanical ventilation, when compared to CPAP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20420724

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Respir Care        ISSN: 0020-1324            Impact factor:   2.258


  3 in total

Review 1.  Our paper 20 years later: how has withdrawal from mechanical ventilation changed?

Authors:  Fernando Frutos-Vivar; Andrés Esteban
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 2.  Trials directly comparing alternative spontaneous breathing trial techniques: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Karen E A Burns; Ibrahim Soliman; Neill K J Adhikari; Amer Zwein; Jessica T Y Wong; Carolina Gomez-Builes; Jose Augusto Pellegrini; Lu Chen; Nuttapol Rittayamai; Michael Sklar; Laurent J Brochard; Jan O Friedrich
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 9.097

3.  Comparison of Energy Expenditure and Oxygen Consumption of Spontaneous Breathing Trial Conducted With and Without Automatic Tube Compensation.

Authors:  Alessandra Fabiane Lago; Elaine Cristina Goncalves; Elaine Caetano Silva; Mayra Goncalves Menegueti; Edson Antonio Nicolini; Maria Auxiliadora-Martins; Edson Zangiacomi Martinez; Ada Clarice Gastaldi; Anibal Basile-Filho
Journal:  J Clin Med Res       Date:  2015-07-24
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.