Literature DB >> 20419054

Using Instrumental Variable (IV) Tests to Evaluate Model Specification in Latent Variable Structural Equation Models.

James B Kirby1, Kenneth A Bollen.   

Abstract

Structural Equation Modeling with latent variables (SEM) is a powerful tool for social and behavioral scientists, combining many of the strengths of psychometrics and econometrics into a single framework. The most common estimator for SEM is the full-information maximum likelihood estimator (ML), but there is continuing interest in limited information estimators because of their distributional robustness and their greater resistance to structural specification errors. However, the literature discussing model fit for limited information estimators for latent variable models is sparse compared to that for full information estimators. We address this shortcoming by providing several specification tests based on the 2SLS estimator for latent variable structural equation models developed by Bollen (1996). We explain how these tests can be used to not only identify a misspecified model, but to help diagnose the source of misspecification within a model. We present and discuss results from a Monte Carlo experiment designed to evaluate the finite sample properties of these tests. Our findings suggest that the 2SLS tests successfully identify most misspecified models, even those with modest misspecification, and that they provide researchers with information that can help diagnose the source of misspecification.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 20419054      PMCID: PMC2858448          DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9531.2009.01217.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sociol Methodol        ISSN: 0081-1750


  2 in total

1.  An Empirical Evaluation of the Use of Fixed Cutoff Points in RMSEA Test Statistic in Structural Equation Models.

Authors:  Feinian Chen; Patrick J Curran; Kenneth A Bollen; James Kirby; Pamela Paxton
Journal:  Sociol Methods Res       Date:  2008-01-01

2.  Asymptotically distribution-free methods for the analysis of covariance structures.

Authors:  M W Browne
Journal:  Br J Math Stat Psychol       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 3.380

  2 in total
  8 in total

1.  Improving the evaluation of model fit in confirmatory factor analysis: A commentary on Gundy, C.M., Fayers, P.M., Groenvold, M., Petersen, M. Aa., Scott, N.W., Sprangers, M.A.J., Velikov, G., Aaronson, N.K. (2011). Comparing higher-order models for the EORTC QLQ-C30. Quality of life research, doi:10.1007/s11136-011-0082-6.

Authors:  Cameron N McIntosh
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 2.  Structural equation models and the quantification of behavior.

Authors:  Kenneth A Bollen; Mark D Noble
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-07-05       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Estimators for longitudinal latent exposure models: examining measurement model assumptions.

Authors:  Brisa N Sánchez; Sehee Kim; Mary D Sammel
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Model-implied instrumental variable-generalized method of moments (MIIV-GMM) estimators for latent variable models.

Authors:  Kenneth A Bollen; Stanislav Kolenikov; Shawn Bauldry
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 2.500

5.  An introduction to model implied instrumental variables using two stage least squares (MIIV-2SLS) in structural equation models (SEMs).

Authors:  Kenneth A Bollen; Zachary F Fisher; Michael L Giordano; Adam G Lilly; Lan Luo; Ai Ye
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2021-07-29

6.  An Instrumental Variable Estimator for Mixed Indicators: Analytic Derivatives and Alternative Parameterizations.

Authors:  Zachary F Fisher; Kenneth A Bollen
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 2.500

7.  A cautionary note on testing latent variable models.

Authors:  Ivan Ropovik
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-11-06

8.  A unified model-implied instrumental variable approach for structural equation modeling with mixed variables.

Authors:  Shaobo Jin; Fan Yang-Wallentin; Kenneth A Bollen
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 2.500

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.