BACKGROUND: Diaphragmatic dysfunction is a major factor in the etiology of postoperative pulmonary complications after upper abdominal surgery. M-mode ultrasonography is now an accepted qualitative method of assessing diaphragmatic motion in normal and pathological conditions. In this study, we evaluated whether diaphragmatic inspiratory amplitude (DIA) as measured by M-mode sonography can be a predictor of pulmonary dysfunction. METHODS: A prospective, single-center, single-unit, observational study was performed in 35 ASA physical status I and II nonsmoking patients undergoing open liver lobectomy. Diaphragmatic movements were assessed by M-mode sonography after a pulmonary function test preoperatively and on postoperative days (PODs) 1, 2, and 7. We measured the DIA (cm) during quiet, deep, and sniff breathing. RESULTS: After liver lobectomy, DIA during deep breathing and vital capacity (VC) showed significant reductions of 60% from their preoperative values on PODs 1 and 2 (P < 0.001). By POD 7, the variables recovered significantly, by 30% from the values on PODs 1 and 2 (P < 0.001). During deep breathing, DIA showed a significant correlation with VC (r = 0.839, P < 0.0001). The best cutoff values of DIA for detecting 30% and 50% decreases of VC from preoperative values, calculated by receiver operating characteristic analysis, were 3.61 and 2.41 cm, with sensitivity of 94% and 81% and specificity of 76% and 91%, respectively (P = 0.0001). Two patients showed postoperative diaphragmatic paralysis but did not complain of respiratory distress symptoms or need supplemental oxygen after being transferred to the general ward. CONCLUSIONS: DIA using M-mode sonography showed a linear correlation with VC measured by spirometry throughout the postoperative period. We conclude that using the M-mode sonographic technique at the bedside can be a practical way to investigate postoperative diaphragmatic dysfunction, and may also be an effective bedside screening method for diaphragmatic paralysis.
BACKGROUND:Diaphragmatic dysfunction is a major factor in the etiology of postoperative pulmonary complications after upper abdominal surgery. M-mode ultrasonography is now an accepted qualitative method of assessing diaphragmatic motion in normal and pathological conditions. In this study, we evaluated whether diaphragmatic inspiratory amplitude (DIA) as measured by M-mode sonography can be a predictor of pulmonary dysfunction. METHODS: A prospective, single-center, single-unit, observational study was performed in 35 ASA physical status I and II nonsmoking patients undergoing open liver lobectomy. Diaphragmatic movements were assessed by M-mode sonography after a pulmonary function test preoperatively and on postoperative days (PODs) 1, 2, and 7. We measured the DIA (cm) during quiet, deep, and sniff breathing. RESULTS: After liver lobectomy, DIA during deep breathing and vital capacity (VC) showed significant reductions of 60% from their preoperative values on PODs 1 and 2 (P < 0.001). By POD 7, the variables recovered significantly, by 30% from the values on PODs 1 and 2 (P < 0.001). During deep breathing, DIA showed a significant correlation with VC (r = 0.839, P < 0.0001). The best cutoff values of DIA for detecting 30% and 50% decreases of VC from preoperative values, calculated by receiver operating characteristic analysis, were 3.61 and 2.41 cm, with sensitivity of 94% and 81% and specificity of 76% and 91%, respectively (P = 0.0001). Two patients showed postoperative diaphragmatic paralysis but did not complain of respiratory distress symptoms or need supplemental oxygen after being transferred to the general ward. CONCLUSIONS: DIA using M-mode sonography showed a linear correlation with VC measured by spirometry throughout the postoperative period. We conclude that using the M-mode sonographic technique at the bedside can be a practical way to investigate postoperative diaphragmatic dysfunction, and may also be an effective bedside screening method for diaphragmatic paralysis.
Authors: Ianthe Boden; Laura Browning; Elizabeth H Skinner; Julie Reeve; Doa El-Ansary; Iain K Robertson; Linda Denehy Journal: Trials Date: 2015-12-15 Impact factor: 2.279