BACKGROUND: Mechanical discoordination as studied by magnetic resonance imaging has been shown to be a better predictor of left ventricular (LV) reverse remodeling after cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) compared with mechanical dyssynchrony. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study assessed the value of acute recoordination derived from speckle-tracking echocardiography for predicting response to CRT compared with acute resynchronization. Thirty patients with heart failure scheduled for CRT were studied at baseline, immediately after CRT, and after 6 months of CRT. Acute recoordination after CRT was indexed by an acute reduction in radial discoordination index (RDI), defined as the ratio of average myocardial thinning to thickening during the ejection phase. RESULTS: CRT responders were defined as those patients whose LV end-systolic volume decreased by >or= 15% at the 6-month follow-up. Immediately after CRT, the responders (n = 18) demonstrated a significant reduction in RDI (P < .001), which was sustained at the 6-month follow-up (P < .001). The nonresponders, however, did not show a significant change in RDI after CRT. LV reverse remodeling at the 6-month follow-up was significantly correlated with acute recoordination (r = 0.75, P < .001) but weakly correlated with acute resynchronization (r = 0.43; P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: Receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed that acute recoordination provided the best separation for prediction of CRT responders compared with acute resynchronization, baseline dyssynchrony, or baseline discoordination. LV recoordination after CRT is an acute phenomenon and predicts response to CRT at 6-month follow-up better than resynchronization. Copyright 2010 American Society of Echocardiography. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
BACKGROUND: Mechanical discoordination as studied by magnetic resonance imaging has been shown to be a better predictor of left ventricular (LV) reverse remodeling after cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) compared with mechanical dyssynchrony. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study assessed the value of acute recoordination derived from speckle-tracking echocardiography for predicting response to CRT compared with acute resynchronization. Thirty patients with heart failure scheduled for CRT were studied at baseline, immediately after CRT, and after 6 months of CRT. Acute recoordination after CRT was indexed by an acute reduction in radial discoordination index (RDI), defined as the ratio of average myocardial thinning to thickening during the ejection phase. RESULTS: CRT responders were defined as those patients whose LV end-systolic volume decreased by >or= 15% at the 6-month follow-up. Immediately after CRT, the responders (n = 18) demonstrated a significant reduction in RDI (P < .001), which was sustained at the 6-month follow-up (P < .001). The nonresponders, however, did not show a significant change in RDI after CRT. LV reverse remodeling at the 6-month follow-up was significantly correlated with acute recoordination (r = 0.75, P < .001) but weakly correlated with acute resynchronization (r = 0.43; P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: Receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed that acute recoordination provided the best separation for prediction of CRT responders compared with acute resynchronization, baseline dyssynchrony, or baseline discoordination. LV recoordination after CRT is an acute phenomenon and predicts response to CRT at 6-month follow-up better than resynchronization. Copyright 2010 American Society of Echocardiography. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
Authors: Benjamin S Frank; Michal Schäfer; Johannes M Douwes; D Dunbar Ivy; Steven H Abman; Jesse A Davidson; Sandra Burzlaff; Max B Mitchell; Gareth J Morgan; Lorna P Browne; Alex J Barker; Uyen Truong; Johannes C von Alvensleben Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2019-12-20 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Naomi D Herz; Joseph Engeda; Robbert Zusterzeel; William E Sanders; Kathryn M O'Callaghan; David G Strauss; Samantha B Jacobs; Kimberly A Selzman; Ileana L Piña; Daniel A Caños Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2015-03-20 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: Michal Schäfer; Petter Bjornstad; Benjamin S Frank; Amy Baumgartner; Uyen Truong; Daniel Enge; Johannes C von Alvensleben; Max B Mitchell; D Dunbar Ivy; Alex J Barker; Jane E B Reusch; Kristen J Nadeau Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2020-05-13 Impact factor: 2.778