Literature DB >> 20418035

Fetal cleft lip with and without cleft palate: comparison between MR imaging and US for prenatal diagnosis.

Guangbin Wang1, Ruiqin Shan, Lianxin Zhao, Xiangyu Zhu, Xinjuan Zhang.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe the magnetic resonance (MR) imaging findings of fetal CL/CP and evaluate its diagnostic value. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twelve fetuses with CL/CP diagnosed by transabdominal US underwent MR imaging within 2 days of US. Half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin echo (HASTE) sequence on T2-weighted images was performed on sagittal, coronal, and axial planes anatomic to the fetuses during maternal breath holding. US and MR imaging findings were compared with final diagnoses obtained from post-natal physical examination or fetal autopsy.
RESULTS: Final diagnoses confirmed incomplete midline cleft lip (n=1), unilateral cleft lip and palate (n=7), bilateral cleft lip and palate (n=1), midline cleft lip and palate (n=3). US and MR imaging diagnosed all 12 fetuses with cleft lip and the laterality. 5 (45.5%) of 11 cleft palates were identified with US, 2 of 7 fetuses with unilateral cleft palate, 2 of 3 fetuses with midline cleft palate, and one fetus with bilateral cleft palate. On MR imaging, 10 (91%) of 11 cleft palates were correctly detected. One fetus with unilateral cleft palate was not detected. No false-positives occurred.
CONCLUSION: MR imaging is valuable for diagnosis of fetal CL/CP. It can demonstrate additional findings and provide more information compared with US.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20418035     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.03.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  6 in total

Review 1.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the fetal musculoskeletal system.

Authors:  Nancy A Chauvin; Teresa Victoria; Asef Khwaja; Hisham Dahmoush; Diego Jaramillo
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2020-11-30

2.  The prenatal diagnosis and classification of cleft palate: the role and value of magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Weizeng Zheng; Baohua Li; Yu Zou; Fenlan Lou
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Fetal MRI as a complement to US in the evaluation of cleft lip and palate.

Authors:  L Manganaro; A Tomei; F Fierro; M Di Maurizio; P Sollazzo; M E Sergi; V Vinci; S Bernardo; D Irimia; P Cascone; M Marini
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 3.469

4.  Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of fetal anomalies: a blinded case-control study.

Authors:  L F Gonçalves; W Lee; S Mody; A Shetty; H Sangi-Haghpeykar; R Romero
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-07-10       Impact factor: 7.299

5.  Prenatal ultrasonographic diagnosis of cleft lip with or without cleft palate; pitfalls and considerations.

Authors:  Dong Wook Kim; Seung-Won Chung; Hwi-Dong Jung; Young-Soo Jung
Journal:  Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2015-08-14

Review 6.  Diagnostic accuracy of fetal MRI to detect cleft palate: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hanneke E M van der Hoek-Snieders; Antonius J M L van den Heuvel; Harmieke van Os-Medendorp; Digna M A Kamalski
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2019-12-03       Impact factor: 3.183

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.