BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The spatial QRS-T angle (SA), a predictor of sudden cardiac death, is a vectorcardiographic variable. Gold standard vertorcardiograms (VCGs) are recorded by using the Frank electrode positions. However, with the commonly available 12-lead ECG, VCGs must be synthesized by matrix multiplication (inverse Dower matrix/Kors matrix). Alternatively, Rautaharju proposed a method to calculate SA directly from the 12-lead ECG. Neither spatial angles computed by using the inverse Dower matrix (SA-D) nor by using the Kors matrix (SA-K) or by using Rautaharju's method (SA-R) have been validated with regard to the spatial angles as directly measured in the Frank VCG (SA-F). Our present study aimed to perform this essential validation. METHODS: We analyzed SAs in 1220 simultaneously recorded 12-lead ECGs and VCGs, in all data, in SA-F-based tertiles, and after stratification according to pathology or sex. RESULTS: Linear regression of SA-K, SA-D, and SA-R on SA-F yielded offsets of 0.01 degree, 20.3 degrees, and 28.3 degrees and slopes of 0.96, 0.86, and 0.79, respectively. The bias of SA-K with respect to SA-F (mean +/- SD, -3.2 degrees +/- 13.9 degrees) was significantly (P < .001) smaller than the bias of both SA-D and SA-R with respect to SA-F (8.0 degrees +/- 18.6 degrees and 9.8 degrees +/- 24.6 degrees, respectively); tertile analysis showed a much more homogeneous behavior of the bias in SA-K than of both the bias in SA-D and in SA-R. In pathologic ECGs, there was no significant bias in SA-K; bias in men and women did not differ. CONCLUSION: SA-K resembled SA-F best. In general, when there is no specific reason either to synthesize VCGs with the inverse Dower matrix or to calculate the spatial QRS-T angle with Rautaharju's method, it seems prudent to use the Kors matrix. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The spatial QRS-T angle (SA), a predictor of sudden cardiac death, is a vectorcardiographic variable. Gold standard vertorcardiograms (VCGs) are recorded by using the Frank electrode positions. However, with the commonly available 12-lead ECG, VCGs must be synthesized by matrix multiplication (inverse Dower matrix/Kors matrix). Alternatively, Rautaharju proposed a method to calculate SA directly from the 12-lead ECG. Neither spatial angles computed by using the inverse Dower matrix (SA-D) nor by using the Kors matrix (SA-K) or by using Rautaharju's method (SA-R) have been validated with regard to the spatial angles as directly measured in the Frank VCG (SA-F). Our present study aimed to perform this essential validation. METHODS: We analyzed SAs in 1220 simultaneously recorded 12-lead ECGs and VCGs, in all data, in SA-F-based tertiles, and after stratification according to pathology or sex. RESULTS: Linear regression of SA-K, SA-D, and SA-R on SA-F yielded offsets of 0.01 degree, 20.3 degrees, and 28.3 degrees and slopes of 0.96, 0.86, and 0.79, respectively. The bias of SA-K with respect to SA-F (mean +/- SD, -3.2 degrees +/- 13.9 degrees) was significantly (P < .001) smaller than the bias of both SA-D and SA-R with respect to SA-F (8.0 degrees +/- 18.6 degrees and 9.8 degrees +/- 24.6 degrees, respectively); tertile analysis showed a much more homogeneous behavior of the bias in SA-K than of both the bias in SA-D and in SA-R. In pathologic ECGs, there was no significant bias in SA-K; bias in men and women did not differ. CONCLUSION:SA-K resembled SA-F best. In general, when there is no specific reason either to synthesize VCGs with the inverse Dower matrix or to calculate the spatial QRS-T angle with Rautaharju's method, it seems prudent to use the Kors matrix. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Authors: Leanna Delhey; Jing Jin; Susan Thapa; Robert Delongchamp; Mohammed F Faramawi Journal: Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol Date: 2019-07-30 Impact factor: 1.468
Authors: Sofia Skampardoni; Dimitrios Poulikakos; Marek Malik; Darren Green; Philip A Kalra Journal: Nephrol Dial Transplant Date: 2019-07-01 Impact factor: 5.992
Authors: Saara Sillanmäki; Jukka A Lipponen; Mika P Tarvainen; Tiina Laitinen; Marja Hedman; Antti Hedman; Antti Kivelä; Hanna Hämäläinen; Tomi Laitinen Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2018-02-08 Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: William Whang; Daichi Shimbo; Emily B Levitan; Jonathan D Newman; Pentti M Rautaharju; Karina W Davidson; Paul Muntner Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2012-01-03 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Younghoon Kwon; Jeffrey R Misialek; Daniel Duprez; David R Jacobs; Alvaro Alonso; Susan R Heckbert; Ying Y Zhao; Susan Redline; Elsayed Z Soliman Journal: Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol Date: 2018-07-02 Impact factor: 1.468
Authors: Farah Z Dawood; Mollie P Roediger; Greg Grandits; Dery Miller; Martin Fisher; Zhu-Ming Zhang; Sally Hodder; Jennifer F Hoy; Jens D Lundgren; James D Neaton; Elsayed Z Soliman Journal: J Electrocardiol Date: 2013-12-04 Impact factor: 1.438
Authors: Farah Z Dawood; Faraaz Khan; Mollie P Roediger; Zhu-Ming Zhang; Shobha Swaminathan; Hartwig Klinker; Jennifer Hoy; Jens D Lundgren; James D Neaton; Elsayed Z Soliman Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2012-10-09 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Katerina Hnatkova; Joachim Seegers; Petra Barthel; Tomas Novotny; Peter Smetana; Markus Zabel; Georg Schmidt; Marek Malik Journal: Europace Date: 2018-08-01 Impact factor: 5.214