Literature DB >> 20417782

Endobronchial ultrasound for lung cancer staging: how many stations should be sampled?

Mark I Block1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: No guidelines exist regarding the number of mediastinal lymph node stations that should be sampled to ensure adequate preoperative staging of lung cancer patients. In recent reports of esophageal endoscopic ultrasound and endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS), fewer than two stations/patient were sampled. An experience with systematic sampling using EBUS to determine how many stations should be sampled to adequately detect mediastinal disease was evaluated.
METHODS: Records were reviewed for all patients with lung cancer who had EBUS between March 9, 2006, and January 6, 2009. For each station sampled the sequence and result (positive, negative, and nondiagnostic) were recorded. For those with a positive biopsy, the sequence number of the first positive station was determined. The affect of systematic sampling on detection of N3 disease was also evaluated.
RESULTS: Ninety-three patients with non-small cell lung cancer had EBUS; 271 mediastinal stations were sampled (range, 0 to 6; mean, 2.9 per patient), with N3 and N2 stations sampled in 51 and 90 patients, respectively. Mediastinal disease was found in 25 patients; 15 patients had multistation N2 disease and 6 patients had N3 disease. In 15 patients (60%), mediastinal disease was detected in the first station sampled; three samples were required to detect 90% of disease, and the remaining 3 patients had their disease detected with the fourth sample.
CONCLUSIONS: Introduction of EBUS as a tool for non-small cell lung cancer staging has led to a shift from systematic nodal sampling to targeted nodal sampling. These results indicate that systematic nodal sampling is feasible with EBUS, and that routinely sampling more than two mediastinal stations may improve staging. Copyright (c) 2010 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20417782     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.01.043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  5 in total

Review 1.  Preoperative mediastinal lymph node staging for non-small cell lung cancer: 2014 update of the 2007 ESTS guidelines.

Authors:  Paul De Leyn; Christophe Dooms; Jaroslaw Kuzdzal; Didier Lardinois; Bernward Passlick; Ramon Rami-Porta; Akif Turna; Paul Van Schil; Frederico Venuta; David Waller; Walter Weder; Marcin Zielinski
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2014-08

2.  Complications, consequences, and practice patterns of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration: Results of the AQuIRE registry.

Authors:  George A Eapen; Archan M Shah; Xiudong Lei; Carlos A Jimenez; Rodolfo C Morice; Lonny Yarmus; Joshua Filner; Cynthia Ray; Gaetane Michaud; Sara R Greenhill; Mona Sarkiss; Roberto Casal; David Rice; David E Ost
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 9.410

3.  The role of VATS in the staging of non small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Reza Bagheri; Alireza Tavassoli; Seyed Ziaollah Haghi; Mehdi Abasi Sahebi; Noora Bigdeli
Journal:  Lung India       Date:  2013-01

4.  "One-stop shop" spectral imaging for rapid on-site diagnosis of lung cancer: a future concept in nano-oncology.

Authors:  Kaid Darwiche; Paul Zarogoulidis; Leslie Krauss; Filiz Oezkan; Robert Fred Henry Walter; Robert Werner; Dirk Theegarten; Leonidas Sakkas; Antonios Sakkas; Wolfgang Hohenforst-Scmidt; Konstantinos Zarogoulidis; Lutz Freitag
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2013-11-22

Review 5.  Video-assisted mediastinoscopic lymphadenectomy (VAMLA) for staging & treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Authors:  Marc Hartert; Jan Tripsky; Martin Huertgen
Journal:  Mediastinum       Date:  2020-03-25
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.