Literature DB >> 20417721

Contrast harmonic echo-endoscopic ultrasound improves accuracy in diagnosis of solid pancreatic masses.

Pietro Fusaroli1, Alessia Spada, Maria Grazia Mancino, Giancarlo Caletti.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Contrast harmonic echo (CHE) has been developed for endoscopic ultrasound (EUS). This new technique detects echo signals from microbubbles in vessels with very slow flow, without artifacts. We assessed whether CHE-EUS increases the accuracy of diagnosis of pancreatic solid lesions.
METHODS: At a tertiary-care EUS center, we examined 90 patients who were suspected of having pancreatic solid neoplasm. Radial and linear echoendoscopes were used with dedicated software for CHE. Sonovue (Bracco International BV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) uptake, pattern, and washout were studied; data were compared for pancreatic lesions and adjacent parenchyma. The final diagnosis was obtained based on results of surgical pathology and/or EUS-fine needle aspiration (FNA) analyses.
RESULTS: The finding of a hypoenhancing mass with an inhomogeneous pattern was a sensitive and accurate identifier of patients with adenocarcinoma (96% and 82%, respectively) (49 of 51 patients with primary pancreatic adenocarcinoma had a hypoenhancing mass that was inhomogeneous and had fast washout). This finding was more accurate in diagnosis than the finding of a hypoechoic lesion using standard EUS (P < .000). Hyperenhancement specifically excluded adenocarcinoma (98%), although sensitivity was low (39%). Of neuroendocrine tumors, 11 of 13 were non-hypo-enhancing (9 hyperenhancing, 2 isoenhancing). Interestingly, CHE-EUS allowed detection of small lesions in 7 patients who had uncertain standard EUS findings because of biliary stents (n = 5) or chronic pancreatitis (n = 2). Targeted EUS-FNA was performed on these lesions.
CONCLUSIONS: Detection of a hypoenhancing and inhomogeneous mass accurately identified patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. CHE-EUS increased the detection of malignant lesions in difficult cases (patients with chronic pancreatitis or biliary stents) and helped guide EUS-FNA. A hyperenhancing pattern could be used to rule out adenocarcinoma. Copyright (c) 2010 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20417721     DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2010.04.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 1542-3565            Impact factor:   11.382


  58 in total

Review 1.  Diagnostic evaluation of solid pancreatic masses.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Tokar; Rohit Walia
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2013-10

2.  Quantitative assessment of tumor angiogenesis using real-time motion-compensated contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging.

Authors:  Marybeth A Pysz; Ismayil Guracar; Kira Foygel; Lu Tian; Jürgen K Willmann
Journal:  Angiogenesis       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 9.596

Review 3.  Contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasound imaging: basic principles, present situation and future perspectives.

Authors:  María-Victoria Alvarez-Sánchez; Bertrand Napoléon
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  Maximizing the endosonography: The role of contrast harmonics, elastography and confocal endomicroscopy.

Authors:  Andrada Seicean; Ofelia Mosteanu; Radu Seicean
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-01-07       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  A case of successful transluminal drainage of walled-off necrosis under contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography guidance.

Authors:  Kosuke Minaga; Mamoru Takenaka; Shunsuke Omoto; Takeshi Miyata; Ken Kamata; Kentaro Yamao; Hajime Imai; Tomohiro Watanabe; Masayuki Kitano; Masatoshi Kudo
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 1.314

6.  Differential diagnosis of solid pancreatic masses: contrast-enhanced harmonic (CEH-EUS), quantitative-elastography (QE-EUS), or both?

Authors:  Julio Iglesias-Garcia; Björn Lindkvist; Jose Lariño-Noia; Ihab Abdulkader-Nallib; J Enrique Dominguez-Muñoz
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 4.623

7.  Role of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration in the diagnosis of mass lesions.

Authors:  Chaoqun Han; Rong Lin; Qin Zhang; Jun Liu; Zhen Ding; Xiaohua Hou
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 2.447

8.  Effectiveness of contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasound for the evaluation of solid pancreatic masses.

Authors:  Jin-Seok Park; Hyung Kil Kim; Byoung Wook Bang; Sang Gu Kim; Seok Jeong; Don Haeng Lee
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 9.  Pancreatico-biliary endoscopic ultrasound: a systematic review of the levels of evidence, performance and outcomes.

Authors:  Pietro Fusaroli; Dimitrios Kypraios; Giancarlo Caletti; Mohamad A Eloubeidi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 10.  Endoscopic ultrasonography for surveillance of individuals at high risk for pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Gabriele Lami; Maria Rosa Biagini; Andrea Galli
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2014-07-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.