Literature DB >> 20417446

Assessment of left ventricular non-compaction in adults: side-by-side comparison of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging with echocardiography.

Franck Thuny1, Alexis Jacquier, Bertrand Jop, Roch Giorgi, Jean-Yves Gaubert, Jean-Michel Bartoli, Guy Moulin, Gilbert Habib.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Two-dimensional echocardiography images obtained at end-diastole and end-systole and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) images obtained at end-diastole represent the three imaging methodologies validated for diagnosis of left ventricular non-compaction (LVNC). No study has compared these methodologies in assessing the magnitude of non-compaction. AIMS: To compare two-dimensional echocardiography with CMR in the evaluation of patients with suspected LVNC.
METHODS: Sixteen patients (48+/-17 years) with LVNC underwent echocardiography and CMR within the same week. Echocardiography images obtained at end-diastole and end-systole were compared in a blinded fashion with those obtained by CMR at end-diastole to assess non-compaction in 17 anatomical segments.
RESULTS: All segments could be analysed by CMR, whereas only 238 (87.5%) and 237 (87.1%) could be analysed by echocardiography at end-diastole and end-systole, respectively (p=0.002). Among the analysable segments, a two-layered structure was observed in 54.0% by CMR, 42.9% by echocardiography at end-diastole and 41.4% by echocardiography at end-systole (p=0.006). Similar distribution patterns were observed with the two echocardiographic methodologies. However, compared with echocardiography, CMR identified a higher rate of two-layered structures in the anterior, anterolateral, inferolateral and inferior segments. Echocardiography at end-systole underestimated the NC/C maximum ratio compared with CMR (p=0.04) and echocardiography at end-diastole (p=0.003). No significant difference was observed between CMR and echocardiography at end-diastole (p=0.83). Interobserver reproducibility of the NC/C maximum ratio was similar for the three methodologies.
CONCLUSION: CMR appears superior to standard echocardiography in assessing the extent of non-compaction and provides supplemental morphological information beyond that obtained with conventional echocardiography.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20417446     DOI: 10.1016/j.acvd.2010.01.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Cardiovasc Dis        ISSN: 1875-2128            Impact factor:   2.340


  34 in total

1.  Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging characteristics of isolated left ventricular noncompaction in a Chinese adult Han population.

Authors:  Huaibing Cheng; Shihua Zhao; Shiliang Jiang; Jinchao Yu; Minjie Lu; Jian Ling; Yan Zhang; Chaowu Yan; Qiong Liu; Shiguo Li; Lixin Jin; Renate Jerecic; Zuoxiang He
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 2.  The role of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of non-ischemic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Mouaz H Al-Mallah; Mohammad Naseem Shareef
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 4.214

Review 3.  Evaluation and management of left ventricular noncompaction cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  R Brandon Stacey; Augustus J Caine; W Gregory Hundley
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2015-02

4.  The prognostic role of CMR using global planimetric criteria in patients with excessive left ventricular trabeculation.

Authors:  Francesca Macaione; Antonella Meloni; Vincenzo Positano; Andrea Barison; Giancarlo Todiere; Laura Pistoia; Daniela Di Lisi; Giuseppina Novo; Salvatore Novo; Alessia Pepe
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-04-05       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Incremental value of contrast echocardiography in the diagnosis of left ventricular noncompaction.

Authors:  Xiaoxiao Zhang; Li Yuan; Linli Qiu; Yali Yang; Qing Lv; Lin Li; Jing Wang; Lin He; Li Zhang; Xinfang Wang; Mingxing Xie; Xu Yu Jin
Journal:  Front Med       Date:  2016-12-23       Impact factor: 4.592

6.  Correlation of trabeculae and papillary muscles with clinical and cardiac characteristics and impact on CMR measures of LV anatomy and function.

Authors:  Michael L Chuang; Philimon Gona; Gilion L T F Hautvast; Carol J Salton; Susan J Blease; Susan B Yeon; Marcel Breeuwer; Christopher J O'Donnell; Warren J Manning
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-11

Review 7.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance: applications in daily practice.

Authors:  Ronny S Jiji; Christopher M Kramer
Journal:  Cardiol Rev       Date:  2011 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.644

Review 8.  Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for the investigation of cardiovascular disorders. Part 1: current applications.

Authors:  Ajit H Goenka; Scott D Flamm
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2014-02

9.  Isolated ventricular noncompaction syndrome in a nigerian male: case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Indrani S Bhattacharya; Marc Dweck; Andrew Gardner; Mark Jones; Mark Francis
Journal:  Cardiol Res Pract       Date:  2010-07-15       Impact factor: 1.866

10.  Diagnosis of left ventricular noncompaction by computed tomography.

Authors:  Mina M Benjamin; Rainer A Khetan; Robert C Kowal; Jeffrey M Schussler
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2012-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.