Literature DB >> 20416952

A prospective randomized trial of intravitreal bevacizumab or laser therapy in the management of diabetic macular edema (BOLT study) 12-month data: report 2.

Michel Michaelides1, Andrew Kaines, Robin D Hamilton, Samantha Fraser-Bell, Ranjan Rajendram, Fahd Quhill, Christopher J Boos, Wen Xing, Catherine Egan, Tunde Peto, Catey Bunce, R David Leslie, Philip G Hykin.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To report the findings at 1 year of a study comparing repeated intravitreal bevacizumab (ivB) and modified Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) macular laser therapy (MLT) in patients with persistent clinically significant diabetic macular edema (CSME).
DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, masked, single-center, 2-year, 2-arm clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 80 eyes of 80 patients with center-involving CSME and at least 1 prior MLT.
METHODS: Subjects were randomized to either ivB (6 weekly; minimum of 3 injections and maximum of 9 injections in the first 12 months) or MLT (4 monthly; minimum of 1 treatment and maximum of 4 treatments in the first 12 months). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary end point was the difference in ETDRS best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at 12 months between the bevacizumab and laser arms.
RESULTS: The baseline mean ETDRS BCVA was 55.7+/-9.7 (range 34-69) in the bevacizumab group and 54.6+/-8.6 (range 36-68) in the laser arm. The mean ETDRS BCVA at 12 months was 61.3+/-10.4 (range 34-79) in the bevacizumab group and 50.0+/-16.6 (range 8-76) in the laser arm (P = 0.0006). Furthermore, the bevacizumab group gained a median of 8 ETDRS letters, whereas the laser group lost a median of 0.5 ETDRS letters (P = 0.0002). The odds of gaining > or =10 ETDRS letters over 12 months were 5.1 times greater in the bevacizumab group than in the laser group (adjusted odds ratio, 5.1; 95% confidence interval, 1.3-19.7; P = 0.019). At 12 months, central macular thickness decreased from 507+/-145 microm (range 281-900 microm) at baseline to 378+/-134 microm (range 167-699 microm) (P<0.001) in the ivB group, whereas it decreased to a lesser extent in the laser group, from 481+/-121 microm (range 279-844 microm) to 413+/-135 microm (range 170-708 microm) (P = 0.02). The median number of injections was 9 (interquartile range [IQR] 8-9) in the ivB group, and the median number of laser treatments was 3 (IQR 2-4) in the MLT group.
CONCLUSIONS: The study provides evidence to support the use of bevacizumab in patients with center-involving CSME without advanced macular ischemia. Copyright 2010 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20416952     DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.03.045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  161 in total

Review 1.  Screening for diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular edema in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Tunde Peto; Christine Tadros
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 4.810

Review 2.  The pathogenesis of early retinal changes of diabetic retinopathy.

Authors:  G B Arden; S Sivaprasad
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  Inhibition of proliferation of retinal vascular endothelial cells more effectively than choroidal vascular endothelial cell proliferation by bevacizumab.

Authors:  Bharani Krishna Mynampati; Kumar Sambhav; Sandeep Grover; Kakarla V Chalam
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 1.779

4.  Intravitreal triamcinolone versus intravitreal bevacizumab for diabetic macular edema: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiao-Ling Zhang; Jian Chen; Ri-Jia Zhang; Wen-Jie Wang; Qing Zhou; Xiao-Yan Qin
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-08-18       Impact factor: 1.779

5.  Aflibercept in diabetic macular edema refractory to previous bevacizumab: outcomes and predictors of success.

Authors:  Rita Laiginhas; Marta Inês Silva; Vitor Rosas; Susana Penas; Vitor Adriano Fernandes; Amândio Rocha-Sousa; Ângela Carneiro; Fernando Falcão-Reis; Manuel Sousa Falcão
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-10-29       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 6.  Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy for diabetic macular edema.

Authors:  David S Boyer; J Jill Hopkins; Jonathan Sorof; Jason S Ehrlich
Journal:  Ther Adv Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.565

7.  Diabetic Retinopathy: Focus on Minority Populations.

Authors:  Arpine Barsegian; Boleslav Kotlyar; Justin Lee; Moro O Salifu; Samy I McFarlane
Journal:  Int J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2017-11-11

8.  Comparison of time- and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography in management of diabetic macular edema.

Authors:  Melissa M Liu; Yulia Wolfson; Susan B Bressler; Diana V Do; Howard S Ying; Neil M Bressler
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 9.  The role of O-GlcNAc signaling in the pathogenesis of diabetic retinopathy.

Authors:  Richard D Semba; Hu Huang; Gerard A Lutty; Jennifer E Van Eyk; Gerald W Hart
Journal:  Proteomics Clin Appl       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 3.494

10.  Current treatments in diabetic macular oedema: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  John Alexander Ford; Noemi Lois; Pamela Royle; Christine Clar; Deepson Shyangdan; Norman Waugh
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.