Tae-Hee Kim1, Hae-Hyeog Lee. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, Soonchunhyang University, Bucheon, Republic of Korea.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To describe the outcome of patients with uterine arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) after uterine artery embolization (UAE). DESIGN: Retrospective case series. SETTING: Tertiary center of a university hospital. PATIENT(S): Thirteen patients were referred to a tertiary medical center from primary care facilities with profuse uterine bleeding. INTERVENTION(S): Uterine artery embolization. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Thirteen patients underwent UAE. Eleven patients had no additional vaginal bleeding, whereas two patients underwent hysterectomy after embolization. RESULT(S): Twelve patients developed AVMs after induced abortions. One patient had a congenital uterine AVM. Based on the transfer notes, eight cases had incomplete abortions, three cases had dysfunctional uterine bleeding, one case had a molar pregnancy, and one case had a uterine AVM. Two cases underwent hysterectomy after UAE. One patient delivered a healthy baby after bilateral UAE. CONCLUSION(S): Uterine AVMs should be suspected in patients with abrupt, profuse vaginal bleeding and a medical history of an induced abortion. Primary physicians should consider uterine AVMs with such a medical history. A prompt diagnosis and therapy are essential for favorable outcomes in patients with uterine AVMs. Crown
OBJECTIVE: To describe the outcome of patients with uterine arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) after uterine artery embolization (UAE). DESIGN: Retrospective case series. SETTING: Tertiary center of a university hospital. PATIENT(S): Thirteen patients were referred to a tertiary medical center from primary care facilities with profuse uterine bleeding. INTERVENTION(S): Uterine artery embolization. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Thirteen patients underwent UAE. Eleven patients had no additional vaginal bleeding, whereas two patients underwent hysterectomy after embolization. RESULT(S): Twelve patients developed AVMs after induced abortions. One patient had a congenital uterine AVM. Based on the transfer notes, eight cases had incomplete abortions, three cases had dysfunctional uterine bleeding, one case had a molar pregnancy, and one case had a uterine AVM. Two cases underwent hysterectomy after UAE. One patient delivered a healthy baby after bilateral UAE. CONCLUSION(S): Uterine AVMs should be suspected in patients with abrupt, profuse vaginal bleeding and a medical history of an induced abortion. Primary physicians should consider uterine AVMs with such a medical history. A prompt diagnosis and therapy are essential for favorable outcomes in patients with uterine AVMs. Crown