Jan Kool1, Eling D de Bruin2, Olavi Airaksinen3,4, Hannu Luomajoki5,3,1. 1. Institute of Physiotherapy, Department of Health, Zürich University of Applied Sciences, Winterthur, Switzerland. 2. Institute of Human Movement Sciences and Sport, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. 3. University of Kuopio, Medical Faculty, Sport Medicin, Kuopio, Finland. 4. Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, University Hospital of Kuopio, Finland. 5. Physiotherapie Reinach, Private Practice, 5734 Reinach, Switzerland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The study was conducted to assess whether patient-specific functional impairment and experienced daily disability improved after treatment to address active movement control of the low back. METHOD: A prospective study was carried out in two outpatient physiotherapy practices in the German-speaking part of Switzerland. 38 patients (17 males and 21 females) suffering from non-specific low back pain (NSLBP) and movement control impairment were treated. The study participants had an average age of 45 +/- 13 years, an average height of 170 +/- 8 cm and an average weight of 73 +/- 15 kg. Patients were assessed prior and post treatment. Treatment was aimed at improving movement control of the lumbar spine, pain and disability. Six physiotherapists treated each patient on average nine times (SD 4.6). Treatment effects were evaluated using a set of six movement control tests (MCT), patient-specific functional pain scores (PSFS) and a Roland and Morris disability questionnaire (RMQ). Means, standard deviations, confidence intervals and paired t-tests were calculated. The effect size (d) was based on the change between t1 (time prior intervention) and t2 (time post intervention) using a significance level of p < 0.05, with d > 0.8 being considered a large effect. Power calculations were performed for type I & II error estimation. RESULTS:Movement control (MCT) showed a 59% improvement from 3.2 (max 6) to 1.3 positive tests (d = 1.3, p < 0.001), complaints (PSFS) decreased 41% from 5.9 points (max 10) to 3.5 (d = 1.3, p < 0.001), and disability (RMQ) decreased 43% from 8.9 to 5.1 points (d = 1.0, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this controlled case series study, based on prior and post intervention, showed that movement control, patient specific functional complaints and disability improved significantly following specific individual exercise programs, performed with physiotherapeutic intervention. The results obtained warrant performance of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to substantiate our findings.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: The study was conducted to assess whether patient-specific functional impairment and experienced daily disability improved after treatment to address active movement control of the low back. METHOD: A prospective study was carried out in two outpatient physiotherapy practices in the German-speaking part of Switzerland. 38 patients (17 males and 21 females) suffering from non-specific low back pain (NSLBP) and movement control impairment were treated. The study participants had an average age of 45 +/- 13 years, an average height of 170 +/- 8 cm and an average weight of 73 +/- 15 kg. Patients were assessed prior and post treatment. Treatment was aimed at improving movement control of the lumbar spine, pain and disability. Six physiotherapists treated each patient on average nine times (SD 4.6). Treatment effects were evaluated using a set of six movement control tests (MCT), patient-specific functional pain scores (PSFS) and a Roland and Morris disability questionnaire (RMQ). Means, standard deviations, confidence intervals and paired t-tests were calculated. The effect size (d) was based on the change between t1 (time prior intervention) and t2 (time post intervention) using a significance level of p < 0.05, with d > 0.8 being considered a large effect. Power calculations were performed for type I & II error estimation. RESULTS: Movement control (MCT) showed a 59% improvement from 3.2 (max 6) to 1.3 positive tests (d = 1.3, p < 0.001), complaints (PSFS) decreased 41% from 5.9 points (max 10) to 3.5 (d = 1.3, p < 0.001), and disability (RMQ) decreased 43% from 8.9 to 5.1 points (d = 1.0, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this controlled case series study, based on prior and post intervention, showed that movement control, patient specific functional complaints and disability improved significantly following specific individual exercise programs, performed with physiotherapeutic intervention. The results obtained warrant performance of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to substantiate our findings.
Authors: M W van Tulder; R Ostelo; J W Vlaeyen; S J Linton; S J Morley; W J Assendelft Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2000-10-15 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Jan Kool; Rob de Bie; Peter Oesch; Otto Knüsel; Piet van den Brandt; Stefan Bachmann Journal: J Rehabil Med Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 2.912
Authors: Jan Kool; Stefan Bachmann; Peter Oesch; Otto Knuesel; Ton Ambergen; Rob de Bie; Piet van den Brandt Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2007-09 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Carolina R Mischiati; Mark Comerford; Emma Gosford; Jacqueline Swart; Sean Ewings; Nadine Botha; Maria Stokes; Sarah L Mottram Journal: J Sports Sci Med Date: 2015-05-08 Impact factor: 2.988
Authors: Jeannette Saner; Jan Kool; Rob A de Bie; Judith M Sieben; Hannu Luomajoki Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2011-09-23 Impact factor: 2.362
Authors: Neena K Sharma; William M Brooks; Anda E Popescu; Linda Vandillen; Steven Z George; Kenneth E McCarson; Byron J Gajewski; Patrick Gorman; Carmen M Cirstea Journal: Brain Sci Date: 2012-09-01
Authors: Alfonso Gil-Martínez; Alba Paris-Alemany; Ibai López-de-Uralde-Villanueva; Roy La Touche Journal: J Pain Res Date: 2018-03-16 Impact factor: 3.133