Literature DB >> 2041551

Sudden death in infants sleeping on polystyrene-filled cushions.

J S Kemp1, B T Thach.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Infants are at risk for both the sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) and accidental suffocation. On postmortem examination, however, it is difficult to distinguish one from the other without information from the scene of death. Healthy infants are assumed to be able to turn their heads and, if not otherwise restrained, to obtain fresh air. We assessed this assumption in an investigation of infant deaths that occurred during sleep on cushions filled with polystyrene beads.
METHODS: We obtained data on 25 deaths from the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission. We also used mechanical and animal models to study physiologic aspects of ventilation relevant to these results, by simulating the effects on an infant of breathing into a cushion. We measured the effects of softness, malleability (molding of the cushion about an infant's head), airflow resistance, and rebreathing of expired gases.
RESULTS: All 25 study infants were prone when found dead, and at least 88 percent were face down with nose and mouth obstructed by the cushion. SIDS was the diagnosis in 19 of the 23 infants who underwent autopsy. Our findings show, however, that the cushion would have limited movement of the infant's head to obtain fresh air, and the amount of rebreathing we estimated to have occurred in the infants was lethal in a rabbit model.
CONCLUSIONS: Accidental suffocation by rebreathing was the most likely cause of death in most of the 25 infants studied. Consequently, there is a need to reassess the cause of death in the 28 to 52 percent of the victims of SIDS who are found with their faces straight down. Safety regulations setting standards for softness, malleability, and the potential for rebreathing are needed for infant bedding.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2041551     DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199106273242605

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  19 in total

1.  Which sleep position is best for infants?

Authors:  P Kumar; S Singhi
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  1995 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.967

Review 2.  Sudden infant death syndrome--insights from epidemiological research.

Authors:  T Dwyer; A L Ponsonby
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 3.  The sudden infant death syndrome.

Authors:  Hannah C Kinney; Bradley T Thach
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-08-20       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  The dangers of soft bedding for infants.

Authors:  J L Emery
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 3.791

5.  Sleeping position and sudden infant death syndrome.

Authors:  W A Norcross
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1993-05

6.  Sleep position, autonomic function, and arousal.

Authors:  B C Galland; G Reeves; B J Taylor; D P Bolton
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 5.747

7.  Mechanical model testing of rebreathing potential in infant bedding materials.

Authors:  J N Carleton; A M Donoghue; W K Porter
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 3.791

8.  Prevalence of prone sleeping position and selected infant care practices of North Dakota infants: a comparison of whites and Native Americans.

Authors:  L Burd
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1994 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.792

9.  Prevalence of and risk factors for sudden infant death syndrome in Canada.

Authors:  W J Millar; G B Hill
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1993-09-01       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 10.  The integrative role of the sigh in psychology, physiology, pathology, and neurobiology.

Authors:  Jan-Marino Ramirez
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.453

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.