Literature DB >> 20415159

Predicting pilots' risk-taking behavior through an implicit association test.

Brett R C Molesworth1, Betty Chang.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The Implicit Association Test (IAT), in combination with a battery of additional psychometric tests, was employed to examine the accuracy with which it predicts pilots' risk-taking behavior.
BACKGROUND: Risk management is an integral part of piloting. Many factors affect pilots' risk management, including individual differences. Therefore, employing a unique methodology from social cognition, the present study examined the influence of attitude, as measured implicitly through the IAT, personality, and flight experience variables on pilots' risk-taking behavior.
METHOD: In addition to a simulated flight on a computer-based flight simulator, 35 pilots completed a battery of psychometric tests.
RESULTS: Among the 6 risk perception variables, 10 risk attitude variables, and 2 experience variables, only 2 variables were found to be significantly related with in-flight risk-taking behavior: everyday risk (risk perception) and the IAT effect (attitude). Of these, the IAT effect was the strongest predictor of flight behavior.
CONCLUSION: The results indicate that implicit attitudinal measures, such as the IAT, provide a more accurate forecast of pilot behavior than do the more traditional explicit attitudinal or personality measures. APPLICATION: An implicit attitudinal measure can be proactively employed to identify pilots who are potentially more likely to engage in high-risk activities, hence permitting a more strategic approach to pilot training.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20415159     DOI: 10.1177/0018720809357756

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Factors        ISSN: 0018-7208            Impact factor:   2.888


  2 in total

1.  Safety culture transformation-The impact of training on explicit and implicit safety attitudes.

Authors:  Nicki Marquardt; Merle Hoebel; Daniela Lud
Journal:  Hum Factors Ergon Manuf       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 1.699

2.  Controlled versus automatic processes: which is dominant to safety? The moderating effect of inhibitory control.

Authors:  Yaoshan Xu; Yongjuan Li; Weidong Ding; Fan Lu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.