OBJECTIVE: To report the results of repeat fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) in thyroid nodules with an initial benign cytological diagnosis that grow during follow-up and/or present suspicious ultrasonographic characteristics. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The sample consisted of 456 patients with 895 nodules. FNAC was repeated after 12 to 18 months in the case of nodules with suspicious ultrasonographic characteristics, irrespective of growth, and when the nodules showed significant growth. RESULTS: Among the 895 nodules examined, 102 (11.4%) presented suspicious ultrasonographic characteristics. The second FNAC revealed malignancy in 18 (17.6%) nodules, including 20% (2/10) of those showing growth and 17.4% (16/92) that did not. Seventy-six (9.6%) of 793 nodules without suspicious characteristics presented growth. Only one case (1.3%) of malignancy was diagnosed by repeat FNAC. CONCLUSIONS: The study suggests ultrasonographic characteristics rather than growth as a criterion for repeat FNAC in the case of nodules with an initial benign cytological diagnosis.
OBJECTIVE: To report the results of repeat fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) in thyroid nodules with an initial benign cytological diagnosis that grow during follow-up and/or present suspicious ultrasonographic characteristics. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The sample consisted of 456 patients with 895 nodules. FNAC was repeated after 12 to 18 months in the case of nodules with suspicious ultrasonographic characteristics, irrespective of growth, and when the nodules showed significant growth. RESULTS: Among the 895 nodules examined, 102 (11.4%) presented suspicious ultrasonographic characteristics. The second FNAC revealed malignancy in 18 (17.6%) nodules, including 20% (2/10) of those showing growth and 17.4% (16/92) that did not. Seventy-six (9.6%) of 793 nodules without suspicious characteristics presented growth. Only one case (1.3%) of malignancy was diagnosed by repeat FNAC. CONCLUSIONS: The study suggests ultrasonographic characteristics rather than growth as a criterion for repeat FNAC in the case of nodules with an initial benign cytological diagnosis.
Authors: Frederico F R Maia; Patrícia S Matos; Elizabeth J Pavin; José Vassallo; Denise E Zantut-Wittmann Journal: Endocrine Date: 2011-04-16 Impact factor: 3.633
Authors: Bryan R Haugen; Erik K Alexander; Keith C Bible; Gerard M Doherty; Susan J Mandel; Yuri E Nikiforov; Furio Pacini; Gregory W Randolph; Anna M Sawka; Martin Schlumberger; Kathryn G Schuff; Steven I Sherman; Julie Ann Sosa; David L Steward; R Michael Tuttle; Leonard Wartofsky Journal: Thyroid Date: 2016-01 Impact factor: 6.568
Authors: Trevor E Angell; Mary C Frates; Marco Medici; Xiaoyun Liu; Norra Kwong; Edmund S Cibas; Matthew I Kim; Ellen Marqusee Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2015-09-09 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Christine E Cherella; Henry A Feldman; Monica Hollowell; Danielle M Richman; Edmund S Cibas; Jessica R Smith; Trevor E Angell; Zhihong Wang; Erik K Alexander; Ari J Wassner Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2018-09-01 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Marco Medici; Xiaoyun Liu; Norra Kwong; Trevor E Angell; Ellen Marqusee; Matthew I Kim; Erik K Alexander Journal: BMC Med Date: 2016-01-27 Impact factor: 8.775
Authors: Agnaldo José Graciano; Carlos Takahiro Chone; Carlos Augusto Fischer; Giuliano Stefanello Bublitz; Ana Jacinta de Aquino Peixoto Journal: Braz J Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2014-07-22